Is There a Duty to Mitigate Damages in Civil Law? Should We Introduce Such a Duty? The Case of Qatar

Q2 Social Sciences Global Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2023-05-02 DOI:10.1163/2211906x-12020004
M. Al-Kaabi
{"title":"Is There a Duty to Mitigate Damages in Civil Law? Should We Introduce Such a Duty? The Case of Qatar","authors":"M. Al-Kaabi","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-12020004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn common law, the non-breaching party of a contract should mitigate damages or risk a reduction in recovery for the breach. The party must take measures to reduce the loss arising from the breach by making a cover purchase, reselling the goods, or taking other actions. The breaching party may claim a reduction in the damages that would be awarded to the injured party up to the amount in which reasonable mitigation measures would have reduced the loss or injury to the injured party. Unlike in common law countries, some civil law countries do not contain a general duty to mitigate damages upon the non-breaching party. However, the concept of damage mitigation has gradually expanded beyond its original sphere of influence. The questions to be answered in this article are as follows: Why is there no duty to mitigate damages in civil law? Should we introduce such a duty?","PeriodicalId":38000,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906x-12020004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In common law, the non-breaching party of a contract should mitigate damages or risk a reduction in recovery for the breach. The party must take measures to reduce the loss arising from the breach by making a cover purchase, reselling the goods, or taking other actions. The breaching party may claim a reduction in the damages that would be awarded to the injured party up to the amount in which reasonable mitigation measures would have reduced the loss or injury to the injured party. Unlike in common law countries, some civil law countries do not contain a general duty to mitigate damages upon the non-breaching party. However, the concept of damage mitigation has gradually expanded beyond its original sphere of influence. The questions to be answered in this article are as follows: Why is there no duty to mitigate damages in civil law? Should we introduce such a duty?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民法中是否有减轻损害的义务?我们应该引入这样的义务吗?卡塔尔案例
在普通法中,合同的守约方应减轻损害或减少违约赔偿的风险。一方必须采取措施,通过购买保险、转售货物或采取其他行动来减少违约造成的损失。违约方可要求减少将判给受害方的损害赔偿金,最高金额为合理的缓解措施将减少受害方的损失或伤害的金额。与英美法系国家不同,一些大陆法系国家没有规定减轻守约方损害的一般义务。然而,减轻损害的概念已经逐渐超出了其最初的影响范围。本文要回答的问题如下:为什么民法中没有减轻损害的义务?我们应该引入这样的义务吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Journal of Comparative Law
Global Journal of Comparative Law Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Global Journal of Comparative Law is a peer reviewed periodical that provides a dynamic platform for the dissemination of ideas on comparative law and reports on developments in the field of comparative law from all parts of the world. In our contemporary globalized world, it is almost impossible to isolate developments in the law in one jurisdiction or society from another. At the same time, what is traditionally called comparative law is increasingly subsumed under aspects of International Law. The Global Journal of Comparative Law therefore aims to maintain the discipline of comparative legal studies as vigorous and dynamic by deepening the space for comparative work in its transnational context.
期刊最新文献
Access to Public Documents and Its Restrictions: a Reflection from the Perspectives of Brazil and Sweden Comparative Study of Selected Nigerian and Indian Labour Practices and the Law The Irony in the Lineage of Modern Chinese Constitutions and Constitutionalism Regulating Surrogacy as a Reproductive Practice in India and Sri Lanka Use of Specialized Tribunals for the Settlement of Construction Projects in Times of a Financial Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1