The Effects of Anger Appeals on Systematic Processing and Intentions: The Moderating Role of Efficacy

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION Communication Reports Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/08934215.2019.1682175
M. Turner, A. Richards, E. Bessarabova, Y. Magid
{"title":"The Effects of Anger Appeals on Systematic Processing and Intentions: The Moderating Role of Efficacy","authors":"M. Turner, A. Richards, E. Bessarabova, Y. Magid","doi":"10.1080/08934215.2019.1682175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The anger activism model proposes that efficacy moderates the effect of anger on message processing and persuasion. This study tested the model’s predictions using a 2 (efficacy) × 2 (anger) × 2 (argument quality) experiment (N = 267) in the context of student protests. We found that when anger was high, people processed higher quality arguments more positively at levels of high efficacy but less positively at levels of low efficacy. A moderated moderated mediation model showed that these cognitions mediated the effect of the experimental interaction on intentions to protest.","PeriodicalId":45913,"journal":{"name":"Communication Reports","volume":"33 1","pages":"14 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08934215.2019.1682175","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1682175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The anger activism model proposes that efficacy moderates the effect of anger on message processing and persuasion. This study tested the model’s predictions using a 2 (efficacy) × 2 (anger) × 2 (argument quality) experiment (N = 267) in the context of student protests. We found that when anger was high, people processed higher quality arguments more positively at levels of high efficacy but less positively at levels of low efficacy. A moderated moderated mediation model showed that these cognitions mediated the effect of the experimental interaction on intentions to protest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
愤怒诉求对系统加工和意向的影响:效能的调节作用
愤怒激进主义模型提出,效能调节愤怒对信息处理和说服的影响。本研究在学生抗议的背景下,使用2(功效)×2(愤怒)×2)(论点质量)实验(N=267)测试了该模型的预测。我们发现,当愤怒情绪高涨时,人们在高功效水平上更积极地处理高质量的论点,而在低功效水平上则不那么积极。一个适度调节的中介模型表明,这些认知对实验互动对抗议意图的影响起到了中介作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Reports
Communication Reports COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Communication Reports (CR), published biannually since 1988, is one of two scholarly journals of the Western States Communication Association (WSCA). The journal publishes original manuscripts that are short, data/text-based, and related to the broadly defined field of human communication. The mission of the journal is to showcase exemplary scholarship without censorship based on topics, methods, or analytical tools. Articles that are purely speculative or theoretical, and not data analytic, are not appropriate for this journal. Authors are expected to devote a substantial portion of the manuscript to analyzing and reporting research data.
期刊最新文献
Information Work with Friends Experiencing an Intimate Health Concern We’re Going Streaking!: Associations Between the Gamification of Mediated Communication and Relational Closeness Promoting the Use of Electric Vehicles on Social Media: The Effects of Message Framing, Point of Reference, and Political Affiliation on Perceived Information Value for Others and Purchase Intentions Disclosing Bipolar Disorder in Romantic Relationships Testing the Mercator Effect: Global Map Projections Persuade Differently According to the Emphasis Frames Used to Contextualize Them
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1