Revisiting the Propensity Score’s Central Role: Towards Bridging Balance and Efficiency in the Era of Causal Machine Learning

N. Hejazi, M. J. van der Laan
{"title":"Revisiting the Propensity Score’s Central Role: Towards Bridging Balance and Efficiency in the Era of Causal Machine Learning","authors":"N. Hejazi, M. J. van der Laan","doi":"10.1353/obs.2023.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:About forty years ago, in a now–seminal contribution, Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) introduced a critical characterization of the propensity score as a central quantity for drawing causal inferences in observational study settings. In the decades since, much progress has been made across several research frontiers in causal inference, notably including the re-weighting and matching paradigms. Focusing on the former and specifically on its intersection with machine learning and semiparametric efficiency theory, we re-examine the role of the propensity score in modern methodological developments. As Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983)’s contribution spurred a focus on the balancing property of the propensity score, we re-examine the degree to which and how this property plays a role in the development of asymptotically efficient estimators of causal effects; moreover, we discuss a connection between the balancing property and efficient estimation in the form of score equations and propose a score test for evaluating whether an estimator achieves empirical balance.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observational studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2023.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:About forty years ago, in a now–seminal contribution, Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) introduced a critical characterization of the propensity score as a central quantity for drawing causal inferences in observational study settings. In the decades since, much progress has been made across several research frontiers in causal inference, notably including the re-weighting and matching paradigms. Focusing on the former and specifically on its intersection with machine learning and semiparametric efficiency theory, we re-examine the role of the propensity score in modern methodological developments. As Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983)’s contribution spurred a focus on the balancing property of the propensity score, we re-examine the degree to which and how this property plays a role in the development of asymptotically efficient estimators of causal effects; moreover, we discuss a connection between the balancing property and efficient estimation in the form of score equations and propose a score test for evaluating whether an estimator achieves empirical balance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视倾向得分的核心作用:在因果机器学习时代实现平衡与效率的桥梁
摘要:大约四十年前,Rosenbaum和Rubin(1983)在一项现在具有开创性意义的贡献中,引入了倾向得分的批判性描述,将其作为在观察性研究环境中进行因果推断的中心量。在此后的几十年里,因果推理的几个研究领域取得了很大进展,特别是包括重新加权和匹配范式。关注前者,特别是它与机器学习和半参数效率理论的交叉,我们重新审视倾向得分在现代方法论发展中的作用。由于Rosenbaum和Rubin(1983)的贡献促使人们关注倾向得分的平衡性质,我们重新审视了这种性质在因果效应渐近有效估计量的发展中发挥作用的程度和方式;此外,我们以分数方程的形式讨论了平衡性质与有效估计之间的联系,并提出了一个分数检验来评估估计器是否实现了经验平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does matching introduce confounding or selection bias into the matched case-control design? Size-biased sensitivity analysis for matched pairs design to assess the impact of healthcare-associated infections A Software Tutorial for Matching in Clustered Observational Studies Using a difference-in-difference control trial to test an intervention aimed at increasing the take-up of a welfare payment in New Zealand Estimating Treatment Effect with Propensity Score Weighted Regression and Double Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1