It's Not Just What You Say, It's How You Say It: Mitigating the Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Effective Content

IF 1.5 4区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Technical Communication Pub Date : 2023-02-22 DOI:10.55177/tc344445
A. Bonsignore
{"title":"It's Not Just What You Say, It's How You Say It: Mitigating the Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions with Effective Content","authors":"A. Bonsignore","doi":"10.55177/tc344445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The goal of this article is to provide a tutorial for measuring the sustainability impacts of our content. Sustainability considerations should be just as important as the accessibility and usability of content. Fortunately, following our known best practices for effective\n content creation and governance also results in a smaller carbon footprint. This not only benefits the planet but also positions content creators as valuable business assets. Method: An extensive literature review led to the development of processes and guidelines that connect our existing\n best practices for content with a new paradigm for sustainable content. Results: This tutorial will examine five content scenarios and the relative impacts of each: modifications to individual web pages, content governance (removal of redundant, outdated, and trivial content), email\n blasts, videos, and podcasts. Metrics will be provided for justifying content decisions to management, and recommendations will be given for both optimizing usability and sustainability. Conclusion: Merging established best practices for content creation and curation with measurable\n energy-to-emissions data gives us powerful tools for justifying content choices and demonstrating measurable value to both the organization and the planet.","PeriodicalId":46338,"journal":{"name":"Technical Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55177/tc344445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this article is to provide a tutorial for measuring the sustainability impacts of our content. Sustainability considerations should be just as important as the accessibility and usability of content. Fortunately, following our known best practices for effective content creation and governance also results in a smaller carbon footprint. This not only benefits the planet but also positions content creators as valuable business assets. Method: An extensive literature review led to the development of processes and guidelines that connect our existing best practices for content with a new paradigm for sustainable content. Results: This tutorial will examine five content scenarios and the relative impacts of each: modifications to individual web pages, content governance (removal of redundant, outdated, and trivial content), email blasts, videos, and podcasts. Metrics will be provided for justifying content decisions to management, and recommendations will be given for both optimizing usability and sustainability. Conclusion: Merging established best practices for content creation and curation with measurable energy-to-emissions data gives us powerful tools for justifying content choices and demonstrating measurable value to both the organization and the planet.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这不仅仅是你说什么,而是你怎么说:用有效的内容减轻温室气体排放的影响
目的:本文的目的是提供一个教程来衡量我们的内容对可持续性的影响。可持续性考虑应该与内容的可访问性和可用性同等重要。幸运的是,遵循我们已知的有效内容创建和治理的最佳实践也会减少碳足迹。这不仅有利于地球,而且将内容创作者定位为宝贵的商业资产。方法:通过广泛的文献综述,制定了流程和指南,将我们现有的内容最佳实践与可持续内容的新范式联系起来。结果:本教程将研究五种内容场景及其相对影响:对单个网页的修改、内容治理(删除多余、过时和琐碎的内容)、电子邮件爆炸、视频和播客。将提供向管理层证明内容决策合理性的指标,并为优化可用性和可持续性提供建议。结论:将内容创建和策划的既定最佳实践与可测量的能源与排放数据相结合,为我们提供了强有力的工具来证明内容选择的合理性,并展示对组织和地球的可测量价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technical Communication
Technical Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
From the Poor to the Rich: Predatory Inclusion and the Robinhood App Review of Research: Critical Interface Analysis as a Heuristic for Justice-Focused, Community-Engaged Design Research Making Solutions Visible: Facilitating Housing Equality through Interface Design Driving Innovation: Analyzing Mobile Ridesharing App Interfaces and Moving Toward Community-Based User Experience (CBX) Reporting Online Aggression: A Transnational Comparative Interface Analysis of Sina Weibo and Twitter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1