A retrospective cross sectional study on clinical profile of neonatal seizures in a tertiary care government hospital, Western India

Qury Nagadia, Ghosha Pandav, Urja Nagadia, Nisha Prajapati, Nehal H. Patel, R. Thanvi
{"title":"A retrospective cross sectional study on clinical profile of neonatal seizures in a tertiary care government hospital, Western India","authors":"Qury Nagadia, Ghosha Pandav, Urja Nagadia, Nisha Prajapati, Nehal H. Patel, R. Thanvi","doi":"10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_24_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Convulsion during the first few weeks of life in a newborn is a frequent problem. Such disturbances may have many causes contributing to their etiology and have prognostic significance as well. Objective: This study aimed to determine the etiology, effect of gestational age, onset, types, and mortality of neonatal convulsions. We also aimed to evaluate the clinical parameters, computed tomography (CT) brain scan, neurosonogram, metabolic profile, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis as well as the response of antiepileptic drugs and outcome in these babies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was done at the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital. The study group comprised 358 neonates with neonatal seizures (163 inborn and 195 referred) admitted over 2 years. Data were entered in Microsoft Excel and analyzed in SPSS version 12 (Chicago, Illinois, USA). Results: Out of 10,232 live births, 163 had seizures in the neonatal period, giving an incidence of 15.9/1000 live births. The most common type of seizure was tonic accounting for 33.2%. The most common etiology was perinatal asphyxia – 50.8%, followed by central nervous system infection – 20.1%. One hundred and twenty-six out of 358 patients expired contributing to mortality of 35.1%. All the newborns with perinatal asphyxia had seizures within the first 7 days. Conclusions: Improvement in antenatal and perinatal care with early identification of high-risk mothers will reduce the incidence of birth asphyxia and thereby of neonatal convulsions. Subtle seizures are most common and should not be missed. CT brain scan and neurosonogram are useful in the early detection of cerebral edema, ischemic hypodensities, and hemorrhage which contributes to prognostic significance.","PeriodicalId":10321,"journal":{"name":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"231 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_24_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Convulsion during the first few weeks of life in a newborn is a frequent problem. Such disturbances may have many causes contributing to their etiology and have prognostic significance as well. Objective: This study aimed to determine the etiology, effect of gestational age, onset, types, and mortality of neonatal convulsions. We also aimed to evaluate the clinical parameters, computed tomography (CT) brain scan, neurosonogram, metabolic profile, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis as well as the response of antiepileptic drugs and outcome in these babies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was done at the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital. The study group comprised 358 neonates with neonatal seizures (163 inborn and 195 referred) admitted over 2 years. Data were entered in Microsoft Excel and analyzed in SPSS version 12 (Chicago, Illinois, USA). Results: Out of 10,232 live births, 163 had seizures in the neonatal period, giving an incidence of 15.9/1000 live births. The most common type of seizure was tonic accounting for 33.2%. The most common etiology was perinatal asphyxia – 50.8%, followed by central nervous system infection – 20.1%. One hundred and twenty-six out of 358 patients expired contributing to mortality of 35.1%. All the newborns with perinatal asphyxia had seizures within the first 7 days. Conclusions: Improvement in antenatal and perinatal care with early identification of high-risk mothers will reduce the incidence of birth asphyxia and thereby of neonatal convulsions. Subtle seizures are most common and should not be missed. CT brain scan and neurosonogram are useful in the early detection of cerebral edema, ischemic hypodensities, and hemorrhage which contributes to prognostic significance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度西部一家政府三级护理医院新生儿癫痫发作临床特征的回顾性横断面研究
背景:新生儿出生前几周的惊厥是一个常见的问题。这种紊乱可能有许多原因导致其病因,并具有预后意义。目的:本研究旨在确定新生儿惊厥的病因、孕龄、发病、类型和死亡率的影响。我们还旨在评估这些婴儿的临床参数、计算机断层扫描(CT)大脑扫描、神经声像图、代谢谱和脑脊液分析,以及抗癫痫药物的反应和结果。材料和方法:在一家三级护理教学医院的新生儿重症监护室进行回顾性横断面研究。研究组包括358名新生儿癫痫发作(163名先天性,195名转诊),入院时间超过2年。数据输入到Microsoft Excel中,并在SPSS版本12(美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥)中进行分析。结果:在10232例活产中,163例在新生儿期癫痫发作,发病率为15.9/1000例。最常见的癫痫发作类型是进补,占33.2%。最常见的病因是围产期窒息,占50.8%,其次是中枢神经系统感染,占20.1%。358名患者中有126名过期,死亡率为35.1%。所有围产期窒息的新生儿在前7天内都有癫痫发作。结论:通过早期识别高危母亲来改善产前和围产期护理,将降低出生窒息和新生儿抽搐的发生率。微妙的癫痫发作是最常见的,不应错过。CT脑扫描和神经信号图可用于早期发现脑水肿、缺血性低密度和出血,对预后有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Standardization of objective structured practical examination in terms of validity and reliability in biochemistry: Our first experience Occupational stress: An impediment to quality nurse–Patient relationship – A rapid review COVID-19 positivity in the COVID suspect and green zones of a large emergency department during the first wave of the pandemic in South India Healthcare-seeking behavior and awareness regarding snakebites and its first-aid management among tribal women in rural Maharashtra Hippocratic oath in dentistry: An insight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1