India's RCEP Dilemma with China: Beyond the Legal Texts*

IF 0.7 4区社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Pacific Focus Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.1111/PAFO.12180

Chao Wang, Vinay Sharma

引用次数: 15

Abstract

The ASEAN-inaugurated Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was eventually concluded on 15 November 2020 after 8 years of tough negotiations India was counted as an important member of the RCEP, but it chose to back out when other members were finalizing the RCEP legal text This article critically analyzes the relevant legal provisions leading to India's withdrawal from this significant mega trade deal, the reasons behind India's refusal of those provisions, the possibility of isolationism India might face, and geopolitical changes in Sino–India relations post stand-off on the Galwan Valley as well as the COVID-19 pandemic It argues that unbalanced economic relations, India's self-reliant ideology, as well as China's growing hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region are among the principle factors for India to back out from the RCEP However, the door to participate in the future remains open for India © 2021 Center for International Studies, Inha University

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

印度与中国的RCEP困境：超越法律文本*

经过8年的艰苦谈判，东盟发起的区域全面经济伙伴关系(RCEP)最终于2020年11月15日达成，印度被视为RCEP的重要成员，但在其他成员敲定RCEP法律文本时，印度选择退出。本文批判性地分析了导致印度退出这一重要的大型贸易协定的相关法律条款，以及印度拒绝这些条款背后的原因。文章认为，不平衡的经济关系、印度自力更生的意识形态以及中国在亚太地区日益增长的霸权是印度退出RCEP的主要因素。然而，印度参与RCEP的大门仍为印度敞开©2021国际研究中心，韩国仁荷大学

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Pacific Focus Multiple-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Pacific Focus is published on behalf of the Center for International Studies, Inha University, South Korea. The Journal is a peer-reviewed and indexed and abstracted in the Social Sciences Citation Index, Social Scisearch, Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition. Pacific Focus" scope encompasses the wide range of research interests concerning the Asia-Pacific, including: - security - regionalism - environment - migration - civil society - multi-culturalism