Auditory Processing in People with Chronic Aphasia

Q3 Arts and Humanities Collegium Antropologicum Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.5671/CA.44.2.5
Katarina Pavičić Dokoza, Z. Kolundžić
{"title":"Auditory Processing in People with Chronic Aphasia","authors":"Katarina Pavičić Dokoza, Z. Kolundžić","doi":"10.5671/CA.44.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The preconditions for successful voice communication are good hearing and listening, and auditory processing that includes the ability to process the audio signal. Damage or deceleration of sound signal processing at any level from the periphery to the central structures leads to disintegration and inability to process the signal effectively. Auditory processing in people with aphasia has not been examined in Croatia to date. Results of studies conducted in other languages point to the negative effects of auditory processing difficulties on the receptive and expressive component of the language. This study was conducted on a sample of subjects with chronic aphasia and a group of control subjects with no nerological or any other disorders that can affect auditory processing. The inclusion criteria for persons with aphasia were impaired langu age skills as a result of cerebrovascular accident that occurred at least six months before the examination, regardless of severity and type of aphasia and normal hearing status. The study did not include persons with aphasia who were unable to repeat the six-word sentence, whether it was impaired comprehension or speech expression, and those whose comprehension was not sufficient to cooperate well during the test. The test was conducted individually for 30 minutes per subject using the Auditory processing test (PSP) that is standardized for the Croatian language. Results from this study showed statistically significant lower achievement on all subtests on PSP-1 (filtered words, speech in noise, dichotic words test, and dichotic sentence test) in people with aphasia compared with control group. People with aphasia and control group subjects showed better results in favour of left ear on variable speech in noise. Filtered words were easily processed through the left ear in people with aphasia while dichotic sentences were easily processed through the left ear in control group. The results of this study confirm the hypothesis of the presence of auditory processing difficulties in people with aphasia and are consistent with previous studies conducted in other languages. In addition, the study points to the need to introduce specific therapeutic procedures in rehabilitation in order to improve the function of auditory processing in persons after a cerebrovascular accident.","PeriodicalId":35544,"journal":{"name":"Collegium Antropologicum","volume":"44 1","pages":"95-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegium Antropologicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5671/CA.44.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The preconditions for successful voice communication are good hearing and listening, and auditory processing that includes the ability to process the audio signal. Damage or deceleration of sound signal processing at any level from the periphery to the central structures leads to disintegration and inability to process the signal effectively. Auditory processing in people with aphasia has not been examined in Croatia to date. Results of studies conducted in other languages point to the negative effects of auditory processing difficulties on the receptive and expressive component of the language. This study was conducted on a sample of subjects with chronic aphasia and a group of control subjects with no nerological or any other disorders that can affect auditory processing. The inclusion criteria for persons with aphasia were impaired langu age skills as a result of cerebrovascular accident that occurred at least six months before the examination, regardless of severity and type of aphasia and normal hearing status. The study did not include persons with aphasia who were unable to repeat the six-word sentence, whether it was impaired comprehension or speech expression, and those whose comprehension was not sufficient to cooperate well during the test. The test was conducted individually for 30 minutes per subject using the Auditory processing test (PSP) that is standardized for the Croatian language. Results from this study showed statistically significant lower achievement on all subtests on PSP-1 (filtered words, speech in noise, dichotic words test, and dichotic sentence test) in people with aphasia compared with control group. People with aphasia and control group subjects showed better results in favour of left ear on variable speech in noise. Filtered words were easily processed through the left ear in people with aphasia while dichotic sentences were easily processed through the left ear in control group. The results of this study confirm the hypothesis of the presence of auditory processing difficulties in people with aphasia and are consistent with previous studies conducted in other languages. In addition, the study points to the need to introduce specific therapeutic procedures in rehabilitation in order to improve the function of auditory processing in persons after a cerebrovascular accident.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性失语症患者的听觉加工
成功的语音通信的先决条件是良好的听力和听力,以及包括处理音频信号的能力在内的听觉处理。从外围到中心结构的任何级别的声音信号处理的损坏或减速都会导致信号分解和无法有效处理。到目前为止,克罗地亚尚未对失语症患者的听觉处理进行检查。用其他语言进行的研究结果表明,听觉处理困难对语言的接受和表达成分产生了负面影响。这项研究是在一组患有慢性失语症的受试者和一组对照受试者身上进行的,他们没有神经生理或任何其他可能影响听觉处理的障碍。失语症患者的纳入标准是,无论失语症的严重程度和类型以及正常听力状态如何,在检查前至少六个月发生的脑血管意外导致语言技能受损。这项研究不包括失语症患者,他们无法重复六个单词的句子,无论是理解力受损还是言语表达受损,以及那些理解力不足以在测试中很好地配合的人。使用克罗地亚语标准化的听觉处理测试(PSP),每个受试者单独进行30分钟的测试。这项研究的结果显示,与对照组相比,失语症患者在PSP-1(过滤词、噪声中的言语、二分词测试和二分句测试)的所有子测试中的成绩在统计学上显著较低。失语症患者和对照组受试者在噪声中的可变语音方面表现出更好的结果,有利于左耳。失语症患者的过滤词很容易通过左耳处理,而对照组的二分句很容易通过左耳处理。这项研究的结果证实了失语症患者存在听觉处理困难的假设,并与之前在其他语言中进行的研究一致。此外,该研究指出,有必要在康复中引入具体的治疗程序,以改善脑血管事故后患者的听觉处理功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Collegium Antropologicum
Collegium Antropologicum Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: International journal Collegium Antropologicum is the official journal of the Croatian Antropological Society and is jointly published by: Croatian Anthropological Society Croatian Association of Medical Anthropology - Croatian Medical Association Department of Natural Sciences, Anthropological Centre and the Scientific Council for Anthropological Research of the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts. With the numerous international recognition of co-operative experts, the Journal represents a relevant reference source in the fields of cultural and biological anthropology, sociology, ethnology, psychology, demography, history, archaeology, genetics, biomedicine, human ecology, nutrition and other fields related to multidisciplinary character of anthropology.
期刊最新文献
Starvation May Change the Type of Paternal but Not Maternal Inheritance of the Telomere Length Throughout Generations Infodemic and Mental Health Consequences Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in Children and Adolescents in the Mediterranean and Continental Regions of Croatia The Level of Empathy and Psychological Distress in Nurses and Health Technicians Differences in the Liking of Sweet Tastes of Different Sources (Natural and Artificial) among Older Adolescents in Slovenia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1