Differences in the Liking of Sweet Tastes of Different Sources (Natural and Artificial) among Older Adolescents in Slovenia

Q3 Arts and Humanities Collegium Antropologicum Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5671/ca.46.1.7
Gordana Vulić
{"title":"Differences in the Liking of Sweet Tastes of Different Sources (Natural and Artificial) among Older Adolescents in Slovenia","authors":"Gordana Vulić","doi":"10.5671/ca.46.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research paper is to investigate the recognition and liking of sweet tastes among older adolescents (19–21 years), and in doing so determine whether any differences exist in the liking of sweet tastes with respect to their differing sources (i.e. either of natural or artificial origin). With this aim in mind, data was obtained from sensory testing performed on a total of 101 participants between 19 and 21 years of age, of whom 60 were female and 41 male. Recognition of the basic tastes (i.e. sweet, salty, sour and bitter) was found to be good among most respondents and its success unrelated to gender. Furthermore, participants were found to demonstrate no difficulties with respect to the correct ordering of solutions of different intensities of sweetness (or, rather, of different concentrations of sucrose in water), regardless of gender. The most liked concentration among both men and women was 4.3%. Also established were differences in the liking of sweet tastes of different sources (i.e. natural and artificial). Participants were offered the most generally liked solution of sucrose in water (4.3%) as well as a number of table-top sweeteners prepared, in accordance with their packaging instructions, to be of comparable gustatory sweetness to the sucrose solution. In this endeavour, the selection of solutes was informed by the availability of table-top sweeteners among the five largest commercial producers, and involved those commercially sold under the names stevia, birch sugar, liquid sweetener (Na cyclamate, Na saccharin, thaumatin), sucralose, erythrol, fructose, Streusüße (sorbitol and saccharin). It was found that the most liked sweet tastes were those of sucrose and sucralose, while the taste of fructose was in third place albeit statistically significantly less liked than the tastes of sucrose and sucralose. Although the results of average values indicate that all kinds of sweet tastes are moderately liked, the liking of stevia and erythrol was found to be statistically significantly lower than the liking of sucrose and sucralose. From this, we conclude that artificial sweeteners are gaining in likeability, but even so, of the three most generally liked sources of sweet taste, two are natural sugars.","PeriodicalId":35544,"journal":{"name":"Collegium Antropologicum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegium Antropologicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5671/ca.46.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this research paper is to investigate the recognition and liking of sweet tastes among older adolescents (19–21 years), and in doing so determine whether any differences exist in the liking of sweet tastes with respect to their differing sources (i.e. either of natural or artificial origin). With this aim in mind, data was obtained from sensory testing performed on a total of 101 participants between 19 and 21 years of age, of whom 60 were female and 41 male. Recognition of the basic tastes (i.e. sweet, salty, sour and bitter) was found to be good among most respondents and its success unrelated to gender. Furthermore, participants were found to demonstrate no difficulties with respect to the correct ordering of solutions of different intensities of sweetness (or, rather, of different concentrations of sucrose in water), regardless of gender. The most liked concentration among both men and women was 4.3%. Also established were differences in the liking of sweet tastes of different sources (i.e. natural and artificial). Participants were offered the most generally liked solution of sucrose in water (4.3%) as well as a number of table-top sweeteners prepared, in accordance with their packaging instructions, to be of comparable gustatory sweetness to the sucrose solution. In this endeavour, the selection of solutes was informed by the availability of table-top sweeteners among the five largest commercial producers, and involved those commercially sold under the names stevia, birch sugar, liquid sweetener (Na cyclamate, Na saccharin, thaumatin), sucralose, erythrol, fructose, Streusüße (sorbitol and saccharin). It was found that the most liked sweet tastes were those of sucrose and sucralose, while the taste of fructose was in third place albeit statistically significantly less liked than the tastes of sucrose and sucralose. Although the results of average values indicate that all kinds of sweet tastes are moderately liked, the liking of stevia and erythrol was found to be statistically significantly lower than the liking of sucrose and sucralose. From this, we conclude that artificial sweeteners are gaining in likeability, but even so, of the three most generally liked sources of sweet taste, two are natural sugars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯洛文尼亚大龄青少年对不同来源(天然和人工)甜味喜好的差异
本研究的目的是调查年龄较大的青少年(19-21岁)对甜味的识别和喜爱程度,并在此过程中确定不同来源(即天然或人工来源)对甜味的喜爱程度是否存在差异。考虑到这一目标,数据来自于对101名年龄在19至21岁之间的参与者进行的感官测试,其中60名女性和41名男性。大多数受访者对基本口味(即甜、咸、酸和苦)的识别能力都很好,其成功与否与性别无关。此外,研究人员发现,无论性别如何,参与者在不同甜味强度(或者更确切地说,不同浓度的水中蔗糖)的溶液的正确排序方面都没有困难。男性和女性最喜欢的浓度是4.3%。不同来源(即天然的和人造的)对甜味的喜好也有所不同。研究人员向参与者提供了最受欢迎的水中蔗糖溶液(4.3%),以及根据包装说明准备的一些桌面甜味剂,这些甜味剂的口感甜度与蔗糖溶液相当。在这一努力中,溶质的选择是根据五大商业生产商中台式甜味剂的供应情况而定的,其中包括以甜叶菊、白桦糖、液体甜味剂(环状糖酸钠、糖精钠、糖精钠)、三氯蔗糖、红糖、果糖、streus æ e(山梨醇和糖精)等名称进行商业销售的甜味剂。研究发现,最受欢迎的甜味是蔗糖和三氯蔗糖的味道,而果糖的味道排在第三位,尽管从统计上看,果糖的味道比蔗糖和三氯蔗糖的味道更不受欢迎。虽然平均值的结果表明,各种甜味都是中等喜欢,但甜叶菊和红叶的喜欢程度在统计学上明显低于蔗糖和三氯蔗糖的喜欢程度。由此,我们得出结论,人工甜味剂越来越受欢迎,但即便如此,在三种最受欢迎的甜味来源中,有两种是天然糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Collegium Antropologicum
Collegium Antropologicum Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: International journal Collegium Antropologicum is the official journal of the Croatian Antropological Society and is jointly published by: Croatian Anthropological Society Croatian Association of Medical Anthropology - Croatian Medical Association Department of Natural Sciences, Anthropological Centre and the Scientific Council for Anthropological Research of the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts. With the numerous international recognition of co-operative experts, the Journal represents a relevant reference source in the fields of cultural and biological anthropology, sociology, ethnology, psychology, demography, history, archaeology, genetics, biomedicine, human ecology, nutrition and other fields related to multidisciplinary character of anthropology.
期刊最新文献
Starvation May Change the Type of Paternal but Not Maternal Inheritance of the Telomere Length Throughout Generations Infodemic and Mental Health Consequences Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in Children and Adolescents in the Mediterranean and Continental Regions of Croatia The Level of Empathy and Psychological Distress in Nurses and Health Technicians Differences in the Liking of Sweet Tastes of Different Sources (Natural and Artificial) among Older Adolescents in Slovenia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1