Righting Injustices Towards the Sámi

A. Sønneland, Carola Lingaas
{"title":"Righting Injustices Towards the Sámi","authors":"A. Sønneland, Carola Lingaas","doi":"10.1163/15718115-bja10105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nOne of the mandates of the Norwegian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (trc) is to contribute to reconciliation between the majority population and the Sámi and Kven population. The Commission is tasked to create greater equality between the majority and minority populations as well as increasing the knowledge about the Sámi and Kven population in the majority. In this paper, we will focus on the Sámi indigenous people.\nWe will examine three aspects: first, the assumption that the reconciliation should be between the majority population and the Sámi population rather than between the State and the population targeted by the Norwegianisation policies. Second, how such a reconciliation between the State and the Sámi is possible when there are ongoing conflicts over the use of land and water, exemplified by the Fosen windmill case. Finally, the trc believes that a common understanding of the Norwegianisation policies and its consequences will lay the foundation for a continued reconciliation between the Sámi and the majority population. The paper discusses the involvement of the majority population in the process as well as the issues of public hearings and reparations.\nBy means of an interdisciplinary examination of the Norwegian trc, this paper presents sociological and legal perspectives. It draws on research from Latin American trc s, particularly the Peruvian trc, and thereby offers comparative perspectives.","PeriodicalId":44103,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the mandates of the Norwegian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (trc) is to contribute to reconciliation between the majority population and the Sámi and Kven population. The Commission is tasked to create greater equality between the majority and minority populations as well as increasing the knowledge about the Sámi and Kven population in the majority. In this paper, we will focus on the Sámi indigenous people. We will examine three aspects: first, the assumption that the reconciliation should be between the majority population and the Sámi population rather than between the State and the population targeted by the Norwegianisation policies. Second, how such a reconciliation between the State and the Sámi is possible when there are ongoing conflicts over the use of land and water, exemplified by the Fosen windmill case. Finally, the trc believes that a common understanding of the Norwegianisation policies and its consequences will lay the foundation for a continued reconciliation between the Sámi and the majority population. The paper discusses the involvement of the majority population in the process as well as the issues of public hearings and reparations. By means of an interdisciplinary examination of the Norwegian trc, this paper presents sociological and legal perspectives. It draws on research from Latin American trc s, particularly the Peruvian trc, and thereby offers comparative perspectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正义的不公正对待萨米人
挪威真相与和解委员会(真相与和解委员会)的任务之一是促进多数人口与Sámi和克文人口之间的和解。委员会的任务是在多数人口和少数人口之间建立更大的平等,并增加对占多数的Sámi和Kven人口的了解。在本文中,我们将重点关注Sámi土著人民。我们将审查三个方面:第一,和解应该是大多数人口与Sámi人口之间的和解,而不是国家与挪威化政策所针对的人口之间的和解。第二,当在土地和水的使用方面存在持续的冲突时,国家与Sámi之间如何可能实现这种和解,福森风车案就是一个例子。最后,trc认为,对挪威化政策及其后果的共同理解将为Sámi与大多数人口之间的持续和解奠定基础。本文讨论了大多数人在这一过程中的参与,以及公开听证和赔偿问题。通过对挪威trc的跨学科研究,本文提出了社会学和法律的观点。它借鉴了拉丁美洲、特别是秘鲁的trc的研究,从而提供了比较的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
The Middle Belt Factor in the Nigeria-Biafra War, 1967–1975 The Othering of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community The Universal Periodic Review and West Papua: Beyond Invisibility? Representation of Indian Christians and their ‘othering’ in Mainstream Indian Cinema, a Critical Evaluation National Minorities in the Odesa Oblast – Applying the European Model to Ensure Peaceful Coexistence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1