Clostridioides difficile Infections During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/ipc.0000000000001273
Abhimanyu Kaura, Daniel Stanton, A. Villasante-Tezanos, Debopriyo Halder, D. Reynoso
{"title":"Clostridioides difficile Infections During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Abhimanyu Kaura, Daniel Stanton, A. Villasante-Tezanos, Debopriyo Halder, D. Reynoso","doi":"10.1097/ipc.0000000000001273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To compare rates of prepandemic Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) during the COVID-19 pandemic and the rates of antibacterial use prepandemic and during the COVID-19 pandemic.\n \n \n \n This was a retrospective data review.\n \n \n \n This study was performed at an academic medical center.\n \n \n \n Patients were all adult patients admitted to the hospital between April 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, who were tested for CDI and admitted in the same time frame in 2020, and who were tested for CDI were included in the study.\n \n \n \n Retrospective data analysis was conducted across 5 hospitals from April 1 to December 31, 2019 (prepandemic), and on the same dates in 2020 during the pandemic. The standardized infection ratio (SIR) for hospital-acquired CDI (HA-CDI) was calculated for both groups. The mean and normal distributions were calculated for all values in both the groups. The 2 groups were compared using unpaired t tests for continuous variables and χ\n 2 tests for discrete variables.\n \n \n \n Thirty-six patients were diagnosed with HA-CDI before the pandemic (2019), and 45 patients during the pandemic (2020). The 2019 HA-CDI SIRs were 0.47 in 2019 and 0.56 in 2020. Days of therapy per 1000 patient-days of antibiotics increased from 337.1 to 364.6 (P = 0.0057). Analysis of 153 inpatients with diarrhea revealed no positive association between COVID and CDI.\n \n \n \n During the COVID-19 pandemic, empiric broad-spectrum antibacterial use increased in our system, as did HA-CDI SIR compared with the national standards. We did not observe a positive correlation between COVID-19 and CDI.\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ipc.0000000000001273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare rates of prepandemic Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) during the COVID-19 pandemic and the rates of antibacterial use prepandemic and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was a retrospective data review. This study was performed at an academic medical center. Patients were all adult patients admitted to the hospital between April 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, who were tested for CDI and admitted in the same time frame in 2020, and who were tested for CDI were included in the study. Retrospective data analysis was conducted across 5 hospitals from April 1 to December 31, 2019 (prepandemic), and on the same dates in 2020 during the pandemic. The standardized infection ratio (SIR) for hospital-acquired CDI (HA-CDI) was calculated for both groups. The mean and normal distributions were calculated for all values in both the groups. The 2 groups were compared using unpaired t tests for continuous variables and χ 2 tests for discrete variables. Thirty-six patients were diagnosed with HA-CDI before the pandemic (2019), and 45 patients during the pandemic (2020). The 2019 HA-CDI SIRs were 0.47 in 2019 and 0.56 in 2020. Days of therapy per 1000 patient-days of antibiotics increased from 337.1 to 364.6 (P = 0.0057). Analysis of 153 inpatients with diarrhea revealed no positive association between COVID and CDI. During the COVID-19 pandemic, empiric broad-spectrum antibacterial use increased in our system, as did HA-CDI SIR compared with the national standards. We did not observe a positive correlation between COVID-19 and CDI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
新冠肺炎大流行期间艰难梭菌感染
比较新冠肺炎大流行期间大流行前艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的发生率与大流行前和新冠肺炎大流行期间抗菌药物的使用率。这是一次回顾性数据回顾。这项研究是在一家学术医疗中心进行的。患者均为2019年4月1日至2019年12月31日期间入院的成年患者,他们接受了CDI检测,并在2020年的同一时间段内入院,他们接受CDI检测。从2019年4月1日至12月31日(疫情前),以及2020年疫情期间的同一天,对5家医院进行了回顾性数据分析。计算两组的医院获得性CDI(HA-CDI)的标准化感染率(SIR)。计算两组中所有值的平均分布和正态分布。两组采用连续变量的非配对t检验和离散变量的χ2检验进行比较。在大流行之前(2019年)有36名患者被诊断为HA-CDI,在大流行期间(2020年)有45名患者被确诊为。2019年HA-CDI SIR在2019年为0.47,在2020年为0.56。每1000名患者的抗生素治疗天数从337.1天增加到364.6天(P=0.0057)。对153名腹泻住院患者的分析显示,新冠肺炎与CDI之间没有正相关。在新冠肺炎大流行期间,与国家标准相比,我们的系统中经验性广谱抗菌药物的使用有所增加,HA-CDI SIR也有所增加。我们没有观察到新冠肺炎与CDI之间的正相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1