The Demise of Moderate Islam: new media, contestation, and reclaiming religious authorities

Wahyudi Akmaliah
{"title":"The Demise of Moderate Islam: new media, contestation, and reclaiming religious authorities","authors":"Wahyudi Akmaliah","doi":"10.18326/ijims.v10i1.1-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The landscape of the Indonesian public sphere amidst the rise of new media has opened both opportunities and threats dealing with Islamic teaching. This condition shapes a danger for the two largest of moderate Muslim Organisations (Muhammadiyah and Nahdatul Ulama/NU), in which they do not engage a lot of this development of the digital platform. Consequently, dealing with religious issues, their voices become voiceless. By employing desk research through some relevant references and collecting information from social media, specifically Instagram and Youtube, this article examines the role of the Islamic organization of moderate Islam in the rapid of the digital platform as the new of the public sphere. The article finds that they have difference respond to dealing with the presence of the new religious authorities. In comparison, while Muhammadiyah is more accepting of them calmly, NU is more reactively in responding.Lanskap ruang publik Indonesia di tengah muncunya media sosial membuka kesempatan sekaligus ancaman terkait dengan dakwah Islam. Hal itu merupakan ancaman bagi dua organisasi besar Moderat Islam di Indonesia (Muhammadiyah dan NU), di mana mereka menjadi kelompok minoritas dalam aktivitas dakwah online. Akibatnya, berkaitan dengan issu-isu keagamaan, suara mereka menjadi tidak terdengar/didengarkan. Dengan melakukan riset studi literatur yang relevan dan informasi yang didapatkan dari akun media sosial, khususnya Instagram dan Youtube, artikel ini menjelaskan peranan organisasi Islam moderat di tengah cepatnya platform digital di ruang publik. Artikel ini menemukan bahwa Muhammadiyah dan NU memiliki respon yang berbeda terkait dengan kehadiran otoritas keagamaan baru. Sebagai perbandingan, penerimaan Muhammadiyah terhadap kehadiran mereka terlebih lebih biasa ketimbang dengan NU yang reactif.","PeriodicalId":42170,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v10i1.1-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

The landscape of the Indonesian public sphere amidst the rise of new media has opened both opportunities and threats dealing with Islamic teaching. This condition shapes a danger for the two largest of moderate Muslim Organisations (Muhammadiyah and Nahdatul Ulama/NU), in which they do not engage a lot of this development of the digital platform. Consequently, dealing with religious issues, their voices become voiceless. By employing desk research through some relevant references and collecting information from social media, specifically Instagram and Youtube, this article examines the role of the Islamic organization of moderate Islam in the rapid of the digital platform as the new of the public sphere. The article finds that they have difference respond to dealing with the presence of the new religious authorities. In comparison, while Muhammadiyah is more accepting of them calmly, NU is more reactively in responding.Lanskap ruang publik Indonesia di tengah muncunya media sosial membuka kesempatan sekaligus ancaman terkait dengan dakwah Islam. Hal itu merupakan ancaman bagi dua organisasi besar Moderat Islam di Indonesia (Muhammadiyah dan NU), di mana mereka menjadi kelompok minoritas dalam aktivitas dakwah online. Akibatnya, berkaitan dengan issu-isu keagamaan, suara mereka menjadi tidak terdengar/didengarkan. Dengan melakukan riset studi literatur yang relevan dan informasi yang didapatkan dari akun media sosial, khususnya Instagram dan Youtube, artikel ini menjelaskan peranan organisasi Islam moderat di tengah cepatnya platform digital di ruang publik. Artikel ini menemukan bahwa Muhammadiyah dan NU memiliki respon yang berbeda terkait dengan kehadiran otoritas keagamaan baru. Sebagai perbandingan, penerimaan Muhammadiyah terhadap kehadiran mereka terlebih lebih biasa ketimbang dengan NU yang reactif.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
温和伊斯兰教的消亡:新媒体、争论和恢复宗教权威
随着新媒体的兴起,印尼公共领域的格局为伊斯兰教教学带来了机遇和威胁。这种情况给两个最大的温和的穆斯林组织(Muhammadiyah和Nahdatul Ulama/NU)带来了危险,因为他们没有参与到数字平台的发展中来。因此,在处理宗教问题时,他们的声音变得无声无息。本文通过查阅相关资料和从社交媒体(尤其是Instagram和Youtube)上收集信息的方法,探讨了温和派伊斯兰教组织在数字平台作为公共领域新事物的快速发展中所扮演的角色。文章发现,他们在应对新宗教权威的存在时有着不同的反应。相比之下,穆罕默迪亚更冷静地接受他们,而NU则更积极地回应。兰斯卡普朗是印度尼西亚的公众人物,他是印度尼西亚的媒体社交成员,他是印度尼西亚的媒体社交成员,他是印度尼西亚的媒体社交成员。印度尼西亚现代伊斯兰教组织(Muhammadiyah dan NU)、少数民族组织(dalam aktivitas dakwah online)。Akibatnya, berkaitan dengan issuu keagamaan, suara mereka menjadi tidak terdengar/ diengarkan。登干密拉库坎访问研究文学杨相关丹信息杨dididapatkan dari akun媒体社交,khususnya Instagram丹Youtube, artikel ini menjelaskan peranan组织伊斯兰温和派迪tengah cepatnya平台数字diruang公众。Artikel ini menemukan bahwa Muhammadiyah和NU memiliki响应yang berbeda terkait dengan kehadiran otoritas keagamaan baru。Sebagai perbandingan, penerimaan Muhammadiyah terhadap kehadiran mereka terlebih lebih biasa ketimbang dengan NU yang反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies (IJIMS): This journal should coverage Islam both as a textual tradition with its own historical integrity and as a social reality which was dynamic and constantly changing. The journal also aims at bridging the gap between the textual and contextual approaches to Islamic Studies; and solving the dichotomy between ‘orthodox’ and ‘heterodox’ Islam. So, the journal invites the intersection of several disciplines and scholars. In other words, its contributors borrowed from a range of disciplines, including the humanities and social sciences.
期刊最新文献
Preventing Intolerant Understandings, Attitudes, and Behaviors Among Generation Z Muslims in Public and Islamic Schools Dynamics of Covid-19 Policy Implementation in DKI Jakarta Unlocking Success: Factors Influencing Zakat Collection and Reputation at Zakat Institution Fiqh Aqalliyah as a Legal alternative to Halal Standardization in Japan as a non-Majority Muslim Country The Shia-Sunni Adhān: A Call to Defending Sectarian Craving for Islamic Authority
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1