Lights up! Assessing standards-based performance skills in drama education

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101259
Kylie Peppler , Sophia Bender , Anthony Phonethibsavads , Nickolina Yankova , Molly Stewart
{"title":"Lights up! Assessing standards-based performance skills in drama education","authors":"Kylie Peppler ,&nbsp;Sophia Bender ,&nbsp;Anthony Phonethibsavads ,&nbsp;Nickolina Yankova ,&nbsp;Molly Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the recent release of the National Core Arts Standards (NCAS), educators need new consistent, fair assessments of drama learning. As an initial starting point, this paper reports on the creation of the LATA Drama Performance Rubric, a standards-based assessment to measure learning occurring under real drama classroom conditions that we hope evaluators will find to be useful. A widespread group of drama instructors coordinated with researchers to create a rubric containing four categories: (1) Diction and Volume; (2) Movement and Gesture; (3) Group Coordination; and (4) Stage Presence. Field testing of the instrument with 97 students in the treatment group and 80 students in the control group demonstrated its ability to distinguish between fourth-grade classrooms that had and had not received long-term drama instruction. Reliability, validity, and NCAS alignment are discussed, along with limitations and future recommendations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X23000251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the recent release of the National Core Arts Standards (NCAS), educators need new consistent, fair assessments of drama learning. As an initial starting point, this paper reports on the creation of the LATA Drama Performance Rubric, a standards-based assessment to measure learning occurring under real drama classroom conditions that we hope evaluators will find to be useful. A widespread group of drama instructors coordinated with researchers to create a rubric containing four categories: (1) Diction and Volume; (2) Movement and Gesture; (3) Group Coordination; and (4) Stage Presence. Field testing of the instrument with 97 students in the treatment group and 80 students in the control group demonstrated its ability to distinguish between fourth-grade classrooms that had and had not received long-term drama instruction. Reliability, validity, and NCAS alignment are discussed, along with limitations and future recommendations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
点亮!戏剧教育中基于标准的表演技巧评估
随着最近国家核心艺术标准(NCAS)的发布,教育工作者需要对戏剧学习进行新的一致、公平的评估。作为最初的起点,本文报告了LATA戏剧表演评估准则的创建,这是一种基于标准的评估,旨在衡量真实戏剧课堂条件下的学习情况,我们希望评估人员会发现这一准则很有用。一个广泛的戏剧导师小组与研究人员协调,创建了一个包含四个类别的量规:(1)听写和卷;(2) 动作和手势;(3) 集团协调;以及(4)舞台存在。该仪器在治疗组的97名学生和对照组的80名学生中进行了现场测试,结果表明该仪器能够区分接受过和未接受过长期戏剧教学的四年级教室。讨论了可靠性、有效性和NCAS比对,以及限制和未来建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
期刊最新文献
Hitting the mark? A user perspective on the relevance and irrelevance of school performance indicators Predicting the Mathematics Literacy of Resilient Students from High‐performing Economies: A Machine Learning Approach Exploring factors influencing teacher self-efficacy in implementing inclusive education in Cambodia: A two-level hierarchical linear model What value do standardized observation systems add to summative teacher evaluation systems? Investigating anonymity in formative and summative peer assessment: Effects on university students’ social-affective factors, perceptions and preference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1