The influence of collective and individual sensemaking on how facilitators and teachers implement a professional development program

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teacher Development Pub Date : 2022-09-29 DOI:10.1080/13664530.2022.2123849
Jayce R. Warner, Debra L. Plowman, David J. Osman, D. Schallert
{"title":"The influence of collective and individual sensemaking on how facilitators and teachers implement a professional development program","authors":"Jayce R. Warner, Debra L. Plowman, David J. Osman, D. Schallert","doi":"10.1080/13664530.2022.2123849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study takes a sociocultural approach in examining how mathematics professional development facilitators and teachers enacted a professional development program in a statewide network of trainings. Facilitators (N = 11) and teachers (N = 62) were surveyed before and after implementation to capture how facilitators understood and then implemented the program with teachers, and how teachers interpreted and then enacted the program with students. Differences in uptake (intended use) and implementation (actual use) were investigated in two separate analyses that looked for differences (1) across levels of iteration (i.e., from original program to facilitators to teachers) and (2) between groups of teachers who participated in the trainings. Results showed substantial variation across levels and between groups such that, although less true of some groups than others, intention to use the program was higher than actual use. Insights are offered into how collective and individual sensemaking processes influence program implementation.","PeriodicalId":46208,"journal":{"name":"Teacher Development","volume":"26 1","pages":"706 - 726"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teacher Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2022.2123849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study takes a sociocultural approach in examining how mathematics professional development facilitators and teachers enacted a professional development program in a statewide network of trainings. Facilitators (N = 11) and teachers (N = 62) were surveyed before and after implementation to capture how facilitators understood and then implemented the program with teachers, and how teachers interpreted and then enacted the program with students. Differences in uptake (intended use) and implementation (actual use) were investigated in two separate analyses that looked for differences (1) across levels of iteration (i.e., from original program to facilitators to teachers) and (2) between groups of teachers who participated in the trainings. Results showed substantial variation across levels and between groups such that, although less true of some groups than others, intention to use the program was higher than actual use. Insights are offered into how collective and individual sensemaking processes influence program implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集体和个人意义建构对辅导员和教师如何实施专业发展计划的影响
本研究采用社会文化的方法来研究数学专业发展促进者和教师如何在全州范围的培训网络中制定专业发展计划。我们在实施前后分别调查了11位引导者(N = 11)和62位教师(N = 62),以了解引导者如何理解并与教师一起实施计划,以及教师如何与学生一起解释并制定计划。在吸收(预期用途)和实现(实际用途)方面的差异在两个独立的分析中进行了调查,以寻找(1)迭代层次之间的差异(即,从原始程序到促进者再到教师)和(2)参加培训的教师组之间的差异。结果显示,在不同的水平和组之间存在着巨大的差异,尽管某些组的情况比其他组要少,但使用该程序的意图高于实际使用。提供了关于集体和个人意义生成过程如何影响程序实现的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teacher Development
Teacher Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Teacher Development is a fully refereed international journal publishing articles on all aspects of teachers" professional development. It acts as a forum for critical and reflective attention to practice in teacher development and aims thereby to contribute to the quality of professional development. The journal takes a "whole-career" view of teacher development, and work from both international and inter-professional perspectives is welcome. Articles may deal with teacher development in varying political and professional contexts, and may be in a variety of styles, in keeping with the diversity of activity in professional development.
期刊最新文献
Teacher-tailored student evaluation of teaching as a formative lens for reflection on teaching: academics’ perspectives Navigating formative assessment as professional development in digital contexts: insights from teachers’ experiences Nature-based teacher education as beyond ‘getting outside:’ relational attunement, attending to the un-noticed, and ethical responsibility Exploring the varying agendas of principals, teachers, and a university related to mentorship Guided attention strategies for developing teacher sight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1