Clinicopathological correlation and prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in renal cell carcinoma

IF 1.1 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Immunopathologia Persa Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI:10.34172/ipp.2022.30329
Hoda Sayed Elkhodary, Khaled E Nasr, S. Ahmed, M. Shakweer, Mai MA Ezz-Eldin
{"title":"Clinicopathological correlation and prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in renal cell carcinoma","authors":"Hoda Sayed Elkhodary, Khaled E Nasr, S. Ahmed, M. Shakweer, Mai MA Ezz-Eldin","doi":"10.34172/ipp.2022.30329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and its correlation with the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains controversial. Objectives: This study aimed to study PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with RCC and its association with clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes. Patients and Methods: PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and TILs was analyzed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) from patients with histologically proven RCC. Results: PD-L1 was positive in tumor cells for 55.8% of patients. PDL-1 expression in TIL was reported in 31.2 % of patients. Patients with PDL1 positive tumor cells had higher median tumor size (P=0.07), higher nuclear grade (P=0.56), and higher lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P=0.23). Patients with PDL1 positive TILs were significantly associated with larger median pathological tumor size (P=0.02), higher probability of renal fat invasion (P=0.001), higher nuclear grade (P=0.05), higher probability of positive margin (P=0.02), positive LVI (P=0.03), higher pathological T stage (P=0.0004); whereas patients with PDL-1 negative TILs had earlier stage at presentation (stage I-II) (P=0.004). There was no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS) for PD-L1 expression of tumor cells and TILs. Conclusion: PDL1 positivity in TILs and not in tumor cells was significantly associated with more aggressive features, and higher stage. No association was found with DFS, PFS, or OS. These data suggest that PD-L1 expression of TILs in RCC tumors contributes to cancer aggressiveness.","PeriodicalId":13454,"journal":{"name":"Immunopathologia Persa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunopathologia Persa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ipp.2022.30329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and its correlation with the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains controversial. Objectives: This study aimed to study PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with RCC and its association with clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes. Patients and Methods: PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and TILs was analyzed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) from patients with histologically proven RCC. Results: PD-L1 was positive in tumor cells for 55.8% of patients. PDL-1 expression in TIL was reported in 31.2 % of patients. Patients with PDL1 positive tumor cells had higher median tumor size (P=0.07), higher nuclear grade (P=0.56), and higher lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P=0.23). Patients with PDL1 positive TILs were significantly associated with larger median pathological tumor size (P=0.02), higher probability of renal fat invasion (P=0.001), higher nuclear grade (P=0.05), higher probability of positive margin (P=0.02), positive LVI (P=0.03), higher pathological T stage (P=0.0004); whereas patients with PDL-1 negative TILs had earlier stage at presentation (stage I-II) (P=0.004). There was no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS) for PD-L1 expression of tumor cells and TILs. Conclusion: PDL1 positivity in TILs and not in tumor cells was significantly associated with more aggressive features, and higher stage. No association was found with DFS, PFS, or OS. These data suggest that PD-L1 expression of TILs in RCC tumors contributes to cancer aggressiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾细胞癌中PD-L1表达的临床病理相关性及预后价值
导言:程序性细胞死亡配体1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1, PD-L1)的表达及其与肾细胞癌(RCC)预后的关系仍存在争议。目的:本研究旨在研究肾细胞癌患者肿瘤细胞和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(til)中PD-L1的表达及其与临床病理因素和生存结局的关系。患者和方法:采用免疫组化(IHC)方法分析组织学证实的RCC患者肿瘤细胞和TILs中PD-L1的表达。结果:55.8%的患者肿瘤细胞中PD-L1阳性。31.2%的患者在TIL中有PDL-1表达。肿瘤细胞呈PDL1阳性的患者肿瘤中位大小较高(P=0.07),核分级较高(P=0.56),淋巴血管侵袭(LVI)较高(P=0.23)。PDL1阳性TILs患者病理肿瘤中位数较大(P=0.02)、肾脂肪浸润概率较高(P=0.001)、核分级较高(P=0.05)、切缘阳性概率较高(P=0.02)、LVI阳性(P=0.03)、病理T分期较高(P=0.0004);而PDL-1阴性til患者在就诊时分期较早(I-II期)(P=0.004)。肿瘤细胞和til的PD-L1表达在无病生存期(DFS)、无进展生存期(PFS)或总生存期(OS)方面无统计学差异。结论:肿瘤细胞中PDL1阳性与肿瘤侵袭性更强、分期更高相关。未发现与DFS、PFS或OS相关。这些数据表明,RCC肿瘤中TILs的PD-L1表达有助于癌症的侵袭性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of the level of agreement between bone mineral density and trabecular bone score regarding gender, age and body mass index The effectiveness of gabapentin in treating overactive bladder: a quasi-experimental study Association of viral load and autophagy-related genes polymorphisms with hepatitis B virus pre-core/core mutations in chronic hepatitis B virus Iraqi patients Impact of COVID-19 on renal transplant recipients Impact of analgesics on the risk of ovarian cancer; a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1