Comparison of healthcare utilization among managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis treated with emergent versus established disease modifying therapy

A. Parenté, Bryce Sutton, A. Petrilla, C. Teigland
{"title":"Comparison of healthcare utilization among managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis treated with emergent versus established disease modifying therapy","authors":"A. Parenté, Bryce Sutton, A. Petrilla, C. Teigland","doi":"10.1080/21556660.2019.1658324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Emerging disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have evolved as an alternative treatment for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The efficacy and safety of established DMTs (interferons, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod and mitoxantrone) have been well studied and clinical trials with small sample sizes have suggested that emerging DMTs (iteriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate/BG-12, alemtuzumab and pegylated IFN) may have distinct advantages relative to established DMTs including better outcomes and reduced healthcare resource utilization. However, there is limited real-world information regarding which DMTs (established vs. emerging) provide the best clinical response and outcomes in managed care populations of patients with MS. Aims: To compare MS related healthcare use within one year of initiating emergent and established DMTs among Managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with MS in the US. Methods: A large national sample of patient-level administrative healthcare claims data was used for this analysis. MS patients aged 18 years and over with a new prescription fill for an established or emergent DMT between 2013 and 2016 were evaluated. Patients were eligible if they were continuously enrolled in a health plan with pharmacy and medical coverage for at least 6 months before and 1 year after initiation of therapy. Four types of healthcare use were examined: MS-related hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits and relapse events (inpatient and outpatient). Multivariate negative binomial models with robust standard errors were used to estimate the association between MS related healthcare use and type of DMT. All models adjusted for age, gender, Charlson index and geographic region. Results: During the study period, 6981 Managed Medicaid individuals with a MS diagnosis initiated a DMT. Of those, 79.8% were female, 50.4% were aged 40–64 years and 21.5% were on emergent DMTs. Emergent DMT users had fewer hospitalizations compared to first generation DMT users within one year of initiating therapy (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46–0.88) and fewer outpatient relapses (ARR = 0.86%, CI: 0.79–0.95). Differences in inpatient relapses and ER visits were not observed by DMT type. Conclusions: This study suggests emergent DMTs are associated with reduced MS-related hospitalizations and outpatient relapses within one year of initiating therapy. Studies examining a longer treatment time frame and additional outcomes are warranted to confirm these findings.","PeriodicalId":15631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658324","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Emerging disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have evolved as an alternative treatment for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The efficacy and safety of established DMTs (interferons, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod and mitoxantrone) have been well studied and clinical trials with small sample sizes have suggested that emerging DMTs (iteriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate/BG-12, alemtuzumab and pegylated IFN) may have distinct advantages relative to established DMTs including better outcomes and reduced healthcare resource utilization. However, there is limited real-world information regarding which DMTs (established vs. emerging) provide the best clinical response and outcomes in managed care populations of patients with MS. Aims: To compare MS related healthcare use within one year of initiating emergent and established DMTs among Managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with MS in the US. Methods: A large national sample of patient-level administrative healthcare claims data was used for this analysis. MS patients aged 18 years and over with a new prescription fill for an established or emergent DMT between 2013 and 2016 were evaluated. Patients were eligible if they were continuously enrolled in a health plan with pharmacy and medical coverage for at least 6 months before and 1 year after initiation of therapy. Four types of healthcare use were examined: MS-related hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits and relapse events (inpatient and outpatient). Multivariate negative binomial models with robust standard errors were used to estimate the association between MS related healthcare use and type of DMT. All models adjusted for age, gender, Charlson index and geographic region. Results: During the study period, 6981 Managed Medicaid individuals with a MS diagnosis initiated a DMT. Of those, 79.8% were female, 50.4% were aged 40–64 years and 21.5% were on emergent DMTs. Emergent DMT users had fewer hospitalizations compared to first generation DMT users within one year of initiating therapy (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46–0.88) and fewer outpatient relapses (ARR = 0.86%, CI: 0.79–0.95). Differences in inpatient relapses and ER visits were not observed by DMT type. Conclusions: This study suggests emergent DMTs are associated with reduced MS-related hospitalizations and outpatient relapses within one year of initiating therapy. Studies examining a longer treatment time frame and additional outcomes are warranted to confirm these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断为多发性硬化症的医疗补助管理个体接受紧急和既定疾病改良治疗的医疗利用率比较
背景:新兴的疾病修饰疗法(dmt)已经发展成为多发性硬化症(MS)患者的替代治疗方法。已有的dmt(干扰素、醋酸格拉替默、那他珠单抗、fingolimod和米托蒽醌)的疗效和安全性已经得到了很好的研究,小样本量的临床试验表明,新兴的dmt (iteriflunomide、富马酸二甲酯/ mg -12、阿仑单抗和聚乙二醇化IFN)相对于已有的dmt可能具有明显的优势,包括更好的结果和更少的医疗资源利用率。然而,关于哪种dmt(已建立的与新兴的)在MS患者的管理式护理人群中提供最佳临床反应和结果的现实信息有限。目的:比较在美国被诊断为MS的管理式医疗补助个人中,在启动急诊和已建立的dmt后一年内MS相关的医疗保健使用情况。方法:采用全国范围内大量患者级别的行政医疗索赔数据进行分析。评估了2013年至2016年期间,18岁及以上的MS患者使用新处方填充已建立或紧急DMT。如果患者在治疗开始前至少6个月和治疗开始后至少1年连续参加有药房和医疗保险的健康计划,则符合资格。四种类型的医疗保健使用被检查:ms相关的住院,急诊室(ER)访问和复发事件(住院和门诊)。使用具有稳健标准误差的多变量负二项模型来估计MS相关医疗保健使用与DMT类型之间的关联。所有模型都根据年龄、性别、查尔森指数和地理区域进行了调整。结果:在研究期间,6981名被诊断为多发性硬化症的管理医疗补助个人开始了DMT。其中女性占79.8%,40 ~ 64岁占50.4%,急诊dmt占21.5%。与第一代DMT使用者相比,紧急DMT使用者在开始治疗的一年内住院次数较少(调整风险比[ARR] = 0.64, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.46-0.88),门诊复发较少(ARR = 0.86%, CI: 0.79-0.95)。住院复发和急诊次数在DMT类型上没有差异。结论:这项研究表明,紧急dmt与ms相关的住院治疗和开始治疗一年内门诊复发的减少有关。有必要对更长的治疗时间框架和其他结果进行研究,以证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Drug Assessment
Journal of Drug Assessment PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment and comorbidity burden among people living with HIV: a review of systematic literature reviews. Investigation of potential substandard dry powder inhalers on EU and North African markets - evaluation of the delivered and fine particle doses. Real world evidence study on treatment patterns and health resource utilization in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Korea. A review of the risks of long-term consequences associated with components of the CHOP chemotherapy regimen. Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis in an Arab population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1