Voices from the rising of the curtain: Democracy and deliberation bringing the disadvantaged to the fore

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Power and Education Pub Date : 2022-08-12 DOI:10.1177/17577438221117763
Daeyoung Goh
{"title":"Voices from the rising of the curtain: Democracy and deliberation bringing the disadvantaged to the fore","authors":"Daeyoung Goh","doi":"10.1177/17577438221117763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A large and growing body of literature has attempted to devise discussion frameworks for school education. However, conceptualizing deliberation able to appreciate the expression of socially disadvantaged people has received relatively little attention. Since the voices of culturally and linguistically depreciated populations would disappear in the institutionalized deliberation process, this paper aims to extend the meaning of democratic deliberation capable of putting forward marginalized accounts. The paper proposes and builds a temporal speech stage named ‘generating deliberation’ on which superiority-based claims can weaken through ‘expressive speech’ anchored in the democratic value of equality. The paper also addresses how expressive speech requires truth-telling based ‘mindful speech’ as a basis for the democratic value of freedom and a more attentive dialogue of generating deliberation. The article first explores divergent assumptions associated with democratic deliberation and their potential dilemmas in foregrounding socially marginalized people. Next, it examines the concept of critical awareness put to work through Rancière’s ideas of dissensus and equality, followed by Foucault’s parrhesia and freedom. Whilst navigating the magnitude of freedom and equality, the paper theorizes generating deliberation as an expressive/mindful conversation that illuminates the socially invisible. The process of generating deliberation would ultimately enrich deliberation participants’ formative experiences of democracy and education.","PeriodicalId":37109,"journal":{"name":"Power and Education","volume":"15 1","pages":"166 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Power and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438221117763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A large and growing body of literature has attempted to devise discussion frameworks for school education. However, conceptualizing deliberation able to appreciate the expression of socially disadvantaged people has received relatively little attention. Since the voices of culturally and linguistically depreciated populations would disappear in the institutionalized deliberation process, this paper aims to extend the meaning of democratic deliberation capable of putting forward marginalized accounts. The paper proposes and builds a temporal speech stage named ‘generating deliberation’ on which superiority-based claims can weaken through ‘expressive speech’ anchored in the democratic value of equality. The paper also addresses how expressive speech requires truth-telling based ‘mindful speech’ as a basis for the democratic value of freedom and a more attentive dialogue of generating deliberation. The article first explores divergent assumptions associated with democratic deliberation and their potential dilemmas in foregrounding socially marginalized people. Next, it examines the concept of critical awareness put to work through Rancière’s ideas of dissensus and equality, followed by Foucault’s parrhesia and freedom. Whilst navigating the magnitude of freedom and equality, the paper theorizes generating deliberation as an expressive/mindful conversation that illuminates the socially invisible. The process of generating deliberation would ultimately enrich deliberation participants’ formative experiences of democracy and education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幕布升起的声音:民主和深思熟虑使弱势群体脱颖而出
越来越多的文献试图为学校教育设计讨论框架。然而,概念化的审议能够欣赏社会弱势群体的表达,却相对较少受到关注。由于文化和语言贬值的人口的声音会在制度化的审议过程中消失,本文旨在扩展能够提出边缘化解释的民主审议的含义。本文提出并构建了一个名为“生成审议”的临时演讲阶段,在这个阶段上,基于优越性的主张可以通过基于平等民主价值观的“表达性演讲”来削弱。该论文还阐述了表达性言论如何需要以讲真话为基础的“正念言论”,作为自由的民主价值观和产生深思熟虑的更专注对话的基础。文章首先探讨了与民主审议相关的不同假设,以及它们在突出社会边缘化人群方面的潜在困境。接下来,它考察了批判意识的概念,通过兰齐埃的异议和平等思想,以及福柯的鹦鹉学舌和自由思想来发挥作用。在探索自由和平等的重要性的同时,该论文将产生思考理论化为一种表达/注意的对话,照亮社会上看不见的人。产生审议的过程最终将丰富审议参与者对民主和教育的形成经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Power and Education
Power and Education Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Navigating classroom challenges and curriculum changes: A qualitative study of an English Teacher’s journey in the Indonesian education system Exploring the mediating role of teacher expectation on whole class participation The role of music in supporting young children’s holistic learning and wellbeing in the context of Froebel’s mother songs Debates in digital pedagogy within prisons Epistemic injustice and unwellness in the classroom: Creating knowledge like we matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1