The power of Buddhist homelands: secularism, space and sovereignty

IF 0.3 0 ASIAN STUDIES South Asian History and Culture Pub Date : 2022-12-26 DOI:10.1080/19472498.2022.2159120
S. Shneiderman
{"title":"The power of Buddhist homelands: secularism, space and sovereignty","authors":"S. Shneiderman","doi":"10.1080/19472498.2022.2159120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This Afterword draws the essays in this special collection together by highlighting how the ‘Buddhist Homeland’ imaginary can be mobilized to advance the agendas of marginalized communities in non-Buddhist state and diasporic spaces. Buddhist practices and identities may be seen as acceptable forms of counter-hegemonic practice, which are not perceived to challenge sovereignty itself in the way that other forms of mobilization from below may. This is in part due to the often deterritorialized nature of Buddhist networks themselves, making it possible to separate claims of belonging to Buddhist places from political claims to sovereignty over specific territorial spaces.","PeriodicalId":43902,"journal":{"name":"South Asian History and Culture","volume":"14 1","pages":"90 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian History and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2022.2159120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This Afterword draws the essays in this special collection together by highlighting how the ‘Buddhist Homeland’ imaginary can be mobilized to advance the agendas of marginalized communities in non-Buddhist state and diasporic spaces. Buddhist practices and identities may be seen as acceptable forms of counter-hegemonic practice, which are not perceived to challenge sovereignty itself in the way that other forms of mobilization from below may. This is in part due to the often deterritorialized nature of Buddhist networks themselves, making it possible to separate claims of belonging to Buddhist places from political claims to sovereignty over specific territorial spaces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
佛教家园的力量:世俗主义、空间和主权
这篇后记通过强调如何动员“佛教家园”的想象来推进非佛教国家和流散空间中边缘化社区的议程,将这篇特殊文集中的文章汇集在一起。佛教的实践和身份可能被视为可接受的反霸权实践形式,不像其他自下而上的动员形式那样被视为挑战主权本身。这在一定程度上是由于佛教网络本身的非领土化性质,使得有可能将属于佛教场所的主张与对特定领土空间的政治主权主张分开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Rhythm, noise and action: decoding R.D. Burman’s soundtracks of Bombay cinema Miraji ke Liye: interview with Julien Columeau Agnes Smedley and the Indian anarchists in Weimar Berlin Miraji and South Asian aesthetics, poetics, and politics A dense tranquillity, a harsh solitude: the ‘un-natural’ modernism of Miraji
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1