Cohesion in human–autonomy teams: an approach for future research

Shan G. Lakhmani, Catherine Neubauer, Andrea S. Krausman, Sean M. Fitzhugh, Samantha Berg, Julia L. Wright, E. Rovira, Jordan Blackman, Kristin E. Schaefer
{"title":"Cohesion in human–autonomy teams: an approach for future research","authors":"Shan G. Lakhmani, Catherine Neubauer, Andrea S. Krausman, Sean M. Fitzhugh, Samantha Berg, Julia L. Wright, E. Rovira, Jordan Blackman, Kristin E. Schaefer","doi":"10.1080/1463922X.2022.2033876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Cohesion is an important property of teams that can affect individual teammates and team outcomes. However, cohesion in teams that include autonomous systems as teammates is an underexplored topic. We examine the extant literature on cohesion in human teams, then build on that foundation to advance the understanding of cohesion in human–autonomy teams, both similarities and differences. We describe team cohesion, the various definitions, factors, dimensions and associated benefits and detriments. We discuss how that element may be affected when the team includes an autonomous teammate with each description. Finally, we identify specific factors of human–autonomy interaction that may be relevant to cohesion, then articulate future research questions critical to advancing science for effective human–autonomy teams. Relevance Statement: The human team literature has provided a foundation onto which human–autonomy team research can build, but the team dynamics, and subsequent states, established in multi-human teams are expected to differ in human–autonomy teams. This manuscript focuses on cohesion, one such state and synthesises elements of human team cohesion and human–autonomy interaction to detail expectations for cohesion in human–autonomy teams. These expectations can serve as a launch point for future research.","PeriodicalId":22852,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science","volume":"23 1","pages":"687 - 724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2022.2033876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Cohesion is an important property of teams that can affect individual teammates and team outcomes. However, cohesion in teams that include autonomous systems as teammates is an underexplored topic. We examine the extant literature on cohesion in human teams, then build on that foundation to advance the understanding of cohesion in human–autonomy teams, both similarities and differences. We describe team cohesion, the various definitions, factors, dimensions and associated benefits and detriments. We discuss how that element may be affected when the team includes an autonomous teammate with each description. Finally, we identify specific factors of human–autonomy interaction that may be relevant to cohesion, then articulate future research questions critical to advancing science for effective human–autonomy teams. Relevance Statement: The human team literature has provided a foundation onto which human–autonomy team research can build, but the team dynamics, and subsequent states, established in multi-human teams are expected to differ in human–autonomy teams. This manuscript focuses on cohesion, one such state and synthesises elements of human team cohesion and human–autonomy interaction to detail expectations for cohesion in human–autonomy teams. These expectations can serve as a launch point for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类自主团队中的凝聚力:一种未来研究的方法
摘要凝聚力是团队的一个重要特性,它可以影响个人队友和团队的结果。然而,将自主系统作为队友的团队中的凝聚力是一个未被充分探索的话题。我们研究了现存的关于人类团队凝聚力的文献,然后在此基础上推进对人类自主团队凝聚力的理解,包括相似性和差异性。我们描述了团队凝聚力、各种定义、因素、维度以及相关的好处和坏处。我们讨论了当团队在每个描述中都包含一个自主队友时,该元素可能会受到怎样的影响。最后,我们确定了可能与凝聚力相关的人-自主互动的具体因素,然后阐明了未来的研究问题,这些问题对于推动科学发展,建立有效的人-自治团队至关重要。相关性陈述:人类团队文献为人类自主团队研究奠定了基础,但多人团队中建立的团队动态和后续状态预计在人类自主团队中会有所不同。这篇手稿专注于凝聚力,一种这样的状态,并综合了人类团队凝聚力和人类-自主互动的元素,以详细说明人类-自主团队对凝聚力的期望。这些期望可以作为未来研究的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Conceptual framework for the design and development of sustainability-oriented products: toward EQUID 4.0 Trust building with artificial intelligence: comparing with human in investment behaviour, emotional arousal and neuro activities Establishing driving simulator validity: drawbacks of null-hypothesis significance testing when compared to equivalence tests and Bayes factors The influence of industry 4.0, internet of things, and physical-cyber systems on human factors: a case study of workers in Indonesian oil and gas refineries A theoretical model of industrial accidents investigations: a conceptualization of the mental processes that trigger and control investigative activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1