Early Literacy, Equity, and Test Score Comparability during the Pandemic

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Assessment Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10627197.2022.2087622
J. Soland, A. McGinty, A. Gray, E. Solari, Walter A. Herring, Rujun Xu
{"title":"Early Literacy, Equity, and Test Score Comparability during the Pandemic","authors":"J. Soland, A. McGinty, A. Gray, E. Solari, Walter A. Herring, Rujun Xu","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2022.2087622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Kindergarten entry assessments (KEAs) are frequently used to understand students’ early literacy skills. Amidst COVID-19, such assessments will be vital in understanding how the pandemic has affected early literacy, including how it has contributed to inequities in the educational system. However, the pandemic has also created challenges for comparing scores from KEAs across years and modes of administration. In this study, we examine these issues using a KEA administered to most Kindergarten students in Virginia. This screener was rapidly converted to an online platform to ensure students could continue taking it during the pandemic. Results indicate that the sample of students taking the test shifted substantially pre- and post-pandemic, complicating comparisons of performance. While we do not find evidence of noninvariance by mode at the test level, we do see signs that more subtle forms of item-level bias may be at play. Implications for equity, fairness, and inclusion are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2022.2087622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Kindergarten entry assessments (KEAs) are frequently used to understand students’ early literacy skills. Amidst COVID-19, such assessments will be vital in understanding how the pandemic has affected early literacy, including how it has contributed to inequities in the educational system. However, the pandemic has also created challenges for comparing scores from KEAs across years and modes of administration. In this study, we examine these issues using a KEA administered to most Kindergarten students in Virginia. This screener was rapidly converted to an online platform to ensure students could continue taking it during the pandemic. Results indicate that the sample of students taking the test shifted substantially pre- and post-pandemic, complicating comparisons of performance. While we do not find evidence of noninvariance by mode at the test level, we do see signs that more subtle forms of item-level bias may be at play. Implications for equity, fairness, and inclusion are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行期间的早期识字率、公平性和考试成绩可比性
摘要幼儿园入学评估(KEA)经常被用来了解学生的早期识字能力。在新冠肺炎期间,此类评估对于了解疫情如何影响早期扫盲,包括如何导致教育系统的不平等至关重要。然而,疫情也给比较KEA在不同年份和管理模式下的得分带来了挑战。在这项研究中,我们使用弗吉尼亚州大多数幼儿园学生的KEA来研究这些问题。这个屏幕很快被转换为一个在线平台,以确保学生在疫情期间可以继续使用。结果表明,参加测试的学生样本在疫情前后发生了很大变化,使成绩比较变得复杂。虽然我们没有在测试水平上发现按模式不方差的证据,但我们确实看到了一些迹象,表明更微妙的项目水平偏差可能在起作用。讨论了对公平、公平和包容性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Assessment
Educational Assessment EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.
期刊最新文献
Dialect and Mathematics Performance in African American Children Who Use AAE: Insights from Explanatory IRT and Error Analysis An Analysis of DIF and Sources of DIF in Achievement Motivation Items Using Anchoring Vignettes Resolving and Re-Scoring Constructed Response Items in Mixed-Format Assessments: An Exploration of Three Approaches Extending Principles of Evidence-Centered Design for Diverse Populations: K–12 English Learners with the Most Significant Cognitive Disabilities Reading Comprehension Tests: Students’ Question Reading and Responding Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1