Nutritional lifestyle patterns and cancer: confounding effect of social determinants across the life course in women from the 1958 British birth cohort study

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Longitudinal and Life Course Studies Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1332/175795920x15789023267726
M. Carayol, G. Albertus, Romain Fantin, T. Lang, M. Kelly-Irving, P. Grosclaude, C. Delpierre
{"title":"Nutritional lifestyle patterns and cancer: confounding effect of social determinants across the life course in women from the 1958 British birth cohort study","authors":"M. Carayol, G. Albertus, Romain Fantin, T. Lang, M. Kelly-Irving, P. Grosclaude, C. Delpierre","doi":"10.1332/175795920x15789023267726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To examine the confounding role of social determinants across the life course in the relationship of nutritional lifestyle patterns with cancer in women.Methods: In the National Child Development Study, 37 items regarding diet, alcohol and physical activity\n frequencies were recorded at ages 33 and 42 years. Some 6,169 women were included and 237 women reported cancer diagnosis before age 55 years. Cancer odds ratios (OR) were estimated by logistic regression for the highest versus the lowest tertile of nutritional lifestyle pattern score. Social\n determinants from birth to adulthood were introduced as potential confounders in logistic models using a life-course approach.Results: Four nutritional lifestyle patterns were identified: ‘Healthy active’, ‘Drinker’, ‘Sweet tooth’ and ‘Western’.\n The ‘Drinker’ pattern was significantly associated with increased cancer risk: covariates-adjusted OR = 1.65 (95% CI: 1.17–2.33; p = .004); ptrend = .017 for all cancers combined, and 1.65 (95% CI: 1.06–2.58; p = .03); ptrend\n = .07 for breast cancer. These associations were attenuated after entering social determinants of birth, childhood and adulthood in the model: covariates and social variables-adjusted OR = 1.54 (95% CI: 1.08–2.18; p = .016); ptrend = .054 for all cancers combined,\n and 1.50 (95% CI: 0.95–2.38; p = .08); ptrend = .19 for breast cancer. The other patterns were not associated with cancer risk.Conclusion: This study demonstrates an association between the ‘Drinker’ pattern and midlife cancer in British\n women. Social determinants across the life course explained a part, though modest, of this association.","PeriodicalId":45988,"journal":{"name":"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"331-352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/175795920x15789023267726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the confounding role of social determinants across the life course in the relationship of nutritional lifestyle patterns with cancer in women.Methods: In the National Child Development Study, 37 items regarding diet, alcohol and physical activity frequencies were recorded at ages 33 and 42 years. Some 6,169 women were included and 237 women reported cancer diagnosis before age 55 years. Cancer odds ratios (OR) were estimated by logistic regression for the highest versus the lowest tertile of nutritional lifestyle pattern score. Social determinants from birth to adulthood were introduced as potential confounders in logistic models using a life-course approach.Results: Four nutritional lifestyle patterns were identified: ‘Healthy active’, ‘Drinker’, ‘Sweet tooth’ and ‘Western’. The ‘Drinker’ pattern was significantly associated with increased cancer risk: covariates-adjusted OR = 1.65 (95% CI: 1.17–2.33; p = .004); ptrend = .017 for all cancers combined, and 1.65 (95% CI: 1.06–2.58; p = .03); ptrend = .07 for breast cancer. These associations were attenuated after entering social determinants of birth, childhood and adulthood in the model: covariates and social variables-adjusted OR = 1.54 (95% CI: 1.08–2.18; p = .016); ptrend = .054 for all cancers combined, and 1.50 (95% CI: 0.95–2.38; p = .08); ptrend = .19 for breast cancer. The other patterns were not associated with cancer risk.Conclusion: This study demonstrates an association between the ‘Drinker’ pattern and midlife cancer in British women. Social determinants across the life course explained a part, though modest, of this association.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
营养生活方式模式与癌症:1958年英国出生队列研究中社会决定因素对女性生命过程的混淆效应
目的:探讨在女性营养生活方式与癌症的关系中,生命过程中社会决定因素的混杂作用。方法:在国家儿童发展研究中,记录了33岁和42岁儿童的饮食、酒精和体育活动频率等37项。约有6169名妇女被纳入研究,其中237名妇女在55岁之前被诊断出癌症。通过logistic回归对营养生活方式评分的最高和最低分位数进行癌症比值比(OR)的估计。从出生到成年的社会决定因素被引入到使用生命历程方法的逻辑模型中作为潜在的混杂因素。结果:确定了四种营养生活方式:“健康活跃”、“饮酒者”、“爱吃甜食”和“西式”。“饮酒者”模式与癌症风险增加显著相关:协变量调整OR = 1.65 (95% CI: 1.17-2.33;P = .004);所有癌症加起来的ptrend = 0.017, 1.65 (95% CI: 1.06-2.58;P = .03);乳腺癌的Ptrend = .07。在模型中加入出生、童年和成年的社会决定因素后,这些关联减弱了:协变量和社会变量调整后的OR = 1.54 (95% CI: 1.08-2.18;P = .016);所有癌症加起来的ptrend = 0.054, 1.50 (95% CI: 0.95-2.38;P = .08);乳腺癌的Ptrend = 0.19。其他模式与癌症风险无关。结论:这项研究证明了英国女性的“饮酒者”模式与中年癌症之间的联系。整个生命过程中的社会决定因素解释了这种关联的一部分,尽管是适度的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
January 2025 editorial: don't look away. The effect of childhood socioeconomic status on adult self-rated health by age and race. Corrigendum to Editorial, Vol 15, Issue 4 (October 2024). Longitudinal association between social participation and trajectories of life satisfaction in late middle-aged Korean adults with physical disabilities. The OHC penalty in the UK: maternal experience and child development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1