Concurrent validity of the Polar Precision Prime® photoplethysmographic system to measure heart rate during a tennis training session

E. Ruiz-Malagón, Santiago Castro-Infantes, Maximiliano Ritaco-Real, V. Soto-Hermoso
{"title":"Concurrent validity of the Polar Precision Prime® photoplethysmographic system to measure heart rate during a tennis training session","authors":"E. Ruiz-Malagón, Santiago Castro-Infantes, Maximiliano Ritaco-Real, V. Soto-Hermoso","doi":"10.1177/17543371231165102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monitoring heart rates has always been important for coaches and athletes. Photoplet-ismographic systems (PPG) are supposed to be less capable of determining heart rate measure in activities with high upper limb movement, such as tennis. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the concurrent validity of the Polar Precision Prime® (PPP®) system existing in the Polar Ignite® sports watch. This was accomplished by measuring averaged heart rates during a tennis training session, divided in three parts (warm-up, main-part and cool-down) and averaged per 10 s intervals by comparing data with the Polar H-10® chest strap synchronised with the Polar V800® (criterion measure). A group of 40 tennis players (32 males, 8 females) took part in the study. Mean average values and between-systems differences and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) were obtained (<4.04 bpm; <5.03%), reporting small differences in all session parts and 10 s intervals. The PPP® system reported high correlation ( r > 0.89) and excellent ICC (ICC > 0.96) in all session parts except the 10 s intervals where the ICC were good (0.85). The systematic bias and random error during the warm-up and 10 s intervals were greater (−0.99 ± 6.02 bpm and −2.41 ± 5.86 bpm, respectively) than the main-part and cool-down (−0.51 ± 1.16 bpm and −0.44 ± 4.02 bpm, respectively). Results suggest that the PPP® system precision is not altered despite upper limb movements during 1-h tennis training sessions. In conclusion, the Polar Ignite® PPG system is a valid tool for monitoring heart rate during a tennis training session.","PeriodicalId":20674,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371231165102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monitoring heart rates has always been important for coaches and athletes. Photoplet-ismographic systems (PPG) are supposed to be less capable of determining heart rate measure in activities with high upper limb movement, such as tennis. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the concurrent validity of the Polar Precision Prime® (PPP®) system existing in the Polar Ignite® sports watch. This was accomplished by measuring averaged heart rates during a tennis training session, divided in three parts (warm-up, main-part and cool-down) and averaged per 10 s intervals by comparing data with the Polar H-10® chest strap synchronised with the Polar V800® (criterion measure). A group of 40 tennis players (32 males, 8 females) took part in the study. Mean average values and between-systems differences and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) were obtained (<4.04 bpm; <5.03%), reporting small differences in all session parts and 10 s intervals. The PPP® system reported high correlation ( r > 0.89) and excellent ICC (ICC > 0.96) in all session parts except the 10 s intervals where the ICC were good (0.85). The systematic bias and random error during the warm-up and 10 s intervals were greater (−0.99 ± 6.02 bpm and −2.41 ± 5.86 bpm, respectively) than the main-part and cool-down (−0.51 ± 1.16 bpm and −0.44 ± 4.02 bpm, respectively). Results suggest that the PPP® system precision is not altered despite upper limb movements during 1-h tennis training sessions. In conclusion, the Polar Ignite® PPG system is a valid tool for monitoring heart rate during a tennis training session.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polar Precision Prime®光容积脉搏描记系统在网球训练期间测量心率的同时有效性
监测心率对教练和运动员来说一直都很重要。一般认为,在诸如网球等上肢运动频繁的活动中,Photoplet-ismographic system (PPG)在测定心率方面的能力较差。因此,本研究的目的是确定Polar Precision Prime®(PPP®)系统存在于Polar Ignite®运动手表的并发有效性。这是通过测量网球训练期间的平均心率来完成的,分为三部分(热身,主要部分和冷却),并通过将数据与与Polar V800®同步的Polar H-10®胸带(标准测量)进行比较,每隔10秒平均一次。一组40名网球运动员(32名男性,8名女性)参加了这项研究。在所有会话部分,除了10 s间隔的ICC良好(0.85)外,获得了平均平均值和系统间差异和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)(0.89)和优秀ICC (ICC > 0.96)。热身和10 s的系统偏差和随机误差分别为- 0.99±6.02 bpm和- 2.41±5.86 bpm,大于主体部分和冷却阶段的系统偏差和随机误差(分别为- 0.51±1.16 bpm和- 0.44±4.02 bpm)。结果表明,尽管在1小时的网球训练中上肢运动,PPP®系统的精度并没有改变。总之,Polar Ignite®PPG系统是网球训练期间监测心率的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology covers the development of novel sports apparel, footwear, and equipment; and the materials, instrumentation, and processes that make advances in sports possible.
期刊最新文献
Effects of training repetition on young footballers’ tactical and physical performances: free and conditioned large-sided games A single trunk-mounted wearable sensor to measure motor performance in triathletes during competition The effectiveness of chalk as a friction modifier for finger pad contact with rocks of varying roughness In-plane density gradation of shoe midsoles for optimal energy absorption performance Development of a video-based test for assessing decision-making proficiency in football referees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1