Seven decades of Chinese state financing in Africa: Tempering current debates

Austin Strange
{"title":"Seven decades of Chinese state financing in Africa: Tempering current debates","authors":"Austin Strange","doi":"10.1080/20780389.2019.1618183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Fierce debate persists among policymakers and researchers about the nature and consequences of overseas Chinese state financing. Developing countries in Africa are a major focus of this controversy. However, popular accounts are often devoid of historical context, and instead emphasize China’s emergence as a prominent aid donor since 2000. This article combines evidence on historical and contemporary Chinese development projects to revisit popular claims about the motives and effects of Chinese government financing in Africa. I delineate Chinese development finance to Africa into four periods largely based on China’s own development trajectory: the early years; revolutionary diplomacy; post-reform, commercially oriented development; and the current period of global engagement. I then revisit three controversial narratives about Chinese development finance to Africa: the ‘rogue donor’ label; the socioeconomic and political consequences for African societies; and potential debt risks for African governments. In doing so, I also review recent evidence using the data discussed in this article. On balance, incorporating historical and recent evidence on Chinese state financing produces a mixed outlook with reasons for both optimism and concern. This contrasts with popular, highly opinionated views on Chinese financing that often extrapolate specific episodes into continent-wide narratives.","PeriodicalId":54115,"journal":{"name":"Economic History of Developing Regions","volume":"34 1","pages":"259 - 279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20780389.2019.1618183","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic History of Developing Regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2019.1618183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fierce debate persists among policymakers and researchers about the nature and consequences of overseas Chinese state financing. Developing countries in Africa are a major focus of this controversy. However, popular accounts are often devoid of historical context, and instead emphasize China’s emergence as a prominent aid donor since 2000. This article combines evidence on historical and contemporary Chinese development projects to revisit popular claims about the motives and effects of Chinese government financing in Africa. I delineate Chinese development finance to Africa into four periods largely based on China’s own development trajectory: the early years; revolutionary diplomacy; post-reform, commercially oriented development; and the current period of global engagement. I then revisit three controversial narratives about Chinese development finance to Africa: the ‘rogue donor’ label; the socioeconomic and political consequences for African societies; and potential debt risks for African governments. In doing so, I also review recent evidence using the data discussed in this article. On balance, incorporating historical and recent evidence on Chinese state financing produces a mixed outlook with reasons for both optimism and concern. This contrasts with popular, highly opinionated views on Chinese financing that often extrapolate specific episodes into continent-wide narratives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国在非洲七十年的国家融资:缓和当前的争论
政策制定者和研究人员一直在激烈争论海外中国政府融资的性质和后果。非洲的发展中国家是这一争议的主要焦点。然而,流行的说法往往缺乏历史背景,而是强调中国自2000年以来成为一个重要的援助国。本文结合历史和当代中国发展项目的证据,重新审视关于中国政府在非洲融资的动机和影响的流行说法。我在很大程度上根据中国自身的发展轨迹,将中国对非开发性融资划分为四个阶段:早期;革命外交;改革后,商业化发展;以及当前的全球参与时期。然后,我回顾了关于中国对非洲发展融资的三种有争议的说法:“流氓捐助者”的标签;对非洲社会的社会经济和政治影响;以及非洲政府的潜在债务风险。在此过程中,我还使用本文中讨论的数据回顾了最近的证据。总的来说,结合有关中国政府融资的历史和近期证据,我们的前景喜忧参半,既有乐观的理由,也有担忧的理由。这与流行的、对中国融资非常固执己见的观点形成了鲜明对比,后者往往将具体事件推断为整个大陆的故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Colonial agricultural estates and rural development in twentieth-century Mexico Mild Arabica coffee trade at a time of market regulation The sins of the church: The long-term impacts of Christian missionary praxis on HIV and sexual behaviour in Zambia Profits and inequality during an export boom. Evidence from tax records in Lima, Peru Like the swing of the pendulum: The history of government-sponsored rural settlements in São Paulo, Brazil (1820s–1920s)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1