Differences in children’s concepts of god. A replication study based on creative tasks with different materials

IF 1.2 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION International Journal of Childrens Spirituality Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1080/1364436x.2020.1826411
K. Kaiser, Ulrich Riegel
{"title":"Differences in children’s concepts of god. A replication study based on creative tasks with different materials","authors":"K. Kaiser, Ulrich Riegel","doi":"10.1080/1364436x.2020.1826411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The gendered experiences of boys and girls in their daily lives appear to predict the motifs that children use to express their concepts of God. At the same time, gender-typical behaviour seems to steer the processes by which these concepts are articulated. This paper tests both of these effects of gender on children’s concepts of God by replicating the method of material collage. The sample consists of n = 51 children attending denominational religious education in a German primary school. The analysis shows that boys significantly more often express their concept of God via technical objects, while girls more often use natural motifs. In this process girls significantly more often use soft material than do boys, whereas the two sexes do not differ significantly in their utilisation of hard material. The results confirm the effect of gender-stereotypes on the expression of children’s God concepts.","PeriodicalId":45218,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Childrens Spirituality","volume":"25 1","pages":"187 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1364436x.2020.1826411","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Childrens Spirituality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436x.2020.1826411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The gendered experiences of boys and girls in their daily lives appear to predict the motifs that children use to express their concepts of God. At the same time, gender-typical behaviour seems to steer the processes by which these concepts are articulated. This paper tests both of these effects of gender on children’s concepts of God by replicating the method of material collage. The sample consists of n = 51 children attending denominational religious education in a German primary school. The analysis shows that boys significantly more often express their concept of God via technical objects, while girls more often use natural motifs. In this process girls significantly more often use soft material than do boys, whereas the two sexes do not differ significantly in their utilisation of hard material. The results confirm the effect of gender-stereotypes on the expression of children’s God concepts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童对上帝概念的差异。基于不同材料的创造性任务的复制研究
男孩和女孩在日常生活中的性别经历似乎可以预测儿童用来表达他们对上帝的概念的母题。与此同时,典型的性别行为似乎引导了阐明这些概念的过程。本文通过复制材料拼贴的方法来测试性别对儿童上帝概念的影响。样本包括在德国一所小学接受宗派宗教教育的n = 51名儿童。分析表明,男孩明显更多地通过技术对象来表达他们对上帝的概念,而女孩更多地使用自然图案。在这个过程中,女孩明显比男孩更多地使用软材料,而两性在使用硬材料方面没有明显差异。研究结果证实了性别刻板印象对儿童上帝概念表达的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
53.80%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Religiosity, gender, and correlates of academic dishonesty among children: a Jordanian study The fluidity of Finnish youths’ Personal worldviews Validation study of the Early Childhood Educators’ Spiritual Practices in the Classroom (ECE-SPC) instrument using Rasch Supporting modern teaching in Islamic schools: pedagogical best practice for teachers Critical Reflection, Spirituality and Professional Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1