Can Listening Hurt You? A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Exposure to Trauma on Listener’s Stress

Q1 Arts and Humanities International Journal of Listening Pub Date : 2021-06-24 DOI:10.1080/10904018.2021.1927734
Tzvi Michelson, A. Kluger
{"title":"Can Listening Hurt You? A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Exposure to Trauma on Listener’s Stress","authors":"Tzvi Michelson, A. Kluger","doi":"10.1080/10904018.2021.1927734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although sharing traumatic experiences with others can facilitate Speakers coping, scholars have hypothesized that the listeners experience stress. We tested this hypothesis by reviewing published literature on the association between exposure to speakers’ trauma accounts and listeners’ stress. We found 49 articles with relevant data, reporting 142 effect sizes. To account for the nesting of effect sizes within articles, we performed a three-level meta-analysis. The meta-analytically weighted mean of the correlations between exposure to trauma and stress was = .15, p < .0001. Yet, the effect was highly heterogeneous Q 141 = 964.3, p < .0001, I 2 = 88.6%, τ = .20. Based on τ, a 95% prediction interval suggests that the true effects of exposure and stress could range from −.24 to .54. Exploratory moderator analyses suggested that long-term exposure attenuates the association and that type of stress measure does not. These results show that exposure can stress the listener, calling for additional research to understand the conditions that mitigate this effect.","PeriodicalId":35114,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Listening","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10904018.2021.1927734","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Listening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2021.1927734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although sharing traumatic experiences with others can facilitate Speakers coping, scholars have hypothesized that the listeners experience stress. We tested this hypothesis by reviewing published literature on the association between exposure to speakers’ trauma accounts and listeners’ stress. We found 49 articles with relevant data, reporting 142 effect sizes. To account for the nesting of effect sizes within articles, we performed a three-level meta-analysis. The meta-analytically weighted mean of the correlations between exposure to trauma and stress was = .15, p < .0001. Yet, the effect was highly heterogeneous Q 141 = 964.3, p < .0001, I 2 = 88.6%, τ = .20. Based on τ, a 95% prediction interval suggests that the true effects of exposure and stress could range from −.24 to .54. Exploratory moderator analyses suggested that long-term exposure attenuates the association and that type of stress measure does not. These results show that exposure can stress the listener, calling for additional research to understand the conditions that mitigate this effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倾听会伤害你吗?创伤暴露对听者压力影响的元分析
摘要尽管与他人分享创伤经历有助于演讲者应对,但学者们假设听众会经历压力。我们通过回顾已发表的关于演讲者创伤描述与听众压力之间关系的文献来检验这一假设。我们发现了49篇有相关数据的文章,报告了142个效果大小。为了说明文章中效应大小的嵌套,我们进行了三级荟萃分析。创伤暴露与压力之间相关性的荟萃分析加权平均值为=.15,p<0.0001。然而,这种影响是高度不均匀的Q 141=964.3,p<.0001,I 2=88.6%,τ=.20。基于τ,95%的预测区间表明,暴露和压力的真实影响可能在−.24到.54之间。探索性调节因子分析表明,长期暴露会减弱这种联系,而这种类型的压力测量则不会。这些结果表明,暴露会给听众带来压力,需要进行更多的研究来了解减轻这种影响的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Listening
International Journal of Listening Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN INNATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL TRAITS AND THE ATTITUDES` ASSESSMENT TOWARD ACTIVE LISTENING AMONG EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS LISTENING TO BOOKS’ DURING THE PANDEMIC: EXAMINING THE USES AND GRATIFICATIONS OF AUDIOBOOK LISTENING RHETORICAL LISTENING AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EXPLORING THE BLACK PETE DEBATE IN FLANDERS RHETORICAL LISTENING AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EXPLORING THE BLACK PETE DEBATE IN FLANDERS INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF RESPONSE FORMAT IN COMPUTER-BASED LECTURE COMPREHENSION TASKS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1