The international sources of prejudice against Shi‘a in the Middle East and North Africa: Original survey evidence from Morocco

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Mediterranean Politics Pub Date : 2021-09-20 DOI:10.1080/13629395.2021.1974198
Matt Buehler, J. Schulhofer-Wohl
{"title":"The international sources of prejudice against Shi‘a in the Middle East and North Africa: Original survey evidence from Morocco","authors":"Matt Buehler, J. Schulhofer-Wohl","doi":"10.1080/13629395.2021.1974198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The increasing sectarianization of the international relations of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is a defining feature of the region’s contemporary politics. Iran has sought to increase its influence among Shi‘i populations of foreign countries, while Saudi Arabia and other Sunni regimes have moved to curtail it. In heterogeneous and polarized MENA societies, like Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq, where the Shi‘a constitute a sizable proportion of the population and compete for political power, it is natural to presume that sectarianization likely increases tension and prejudice against the Shi‘a. Yet, little is known about homogenous MENA societies, where the Shi‘a exist as an infinitesimal, uninfluential minority that does not seek political power. This topic is examined using an original, nationally-representative survey of 2,000 respondents in Morocco. We find that about 59 per cent of individuals express interpersonal prejudice against Moroccan Shi‘a, expressing discomfort at the prospect of having a Shi‘i neighbour. Such prejudice is counter-intuitive, given that Moroccan Shi‘a constitute a miniscule minority – less than .1 per cent of the population. We investigate three hypotheses concerning the sources of anti-Shi‘i prejudice, which locate them in social marginalization, religious beliefs and practices, and views about regional politics. The first two hypotheses are drawn from the existing literature, whereas the third is our unique theoretical contribution. Our results, which find support for the connection between individuals’ views about regional politics and anti-Shi‘i prejudice, advance scholarly understanding of religious diversity in the MENA, showing how international developments can trickle down into interpersonal relations to hinder the acceptance and tolerance of sectarian minorities.","PeriodicalId":46666,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Politics","volume":"28 1","pages":"463 - 491"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2021.1974198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The increasing sectarianization of the international relations of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is a defining feature of the region’s contemporary politics. Iran has sought to increase its influence among Shi‘i populations of foreign countries, while Saudi Arabia and other Sunni regimes have moved to curtail it. In heterogeneous and polarized MENA societies, like Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq, where the Shi‘a constitute a sizable proportion of the population and compete for political power, it is natural to presume that sectarianization likely increases tension and prejudice against the Shi‘a. Yet, little is known about homogenous MENA societies, where the Shi‘a exist as an infinitesimal, uninfluential minority that does not seek political power. This topic is examined using an original, nationally-representative survey of 2,000 respondents in Morocco. We find that about 59 per cent of individuals express interpersonal prejudice against Moroccan Shi‘a, expressing discomfort at the prospect of having a Shi‘i neighbour. Such prejudice is counter-intuitive, given that Moroccan Shi‘a constitute a miniscule minority – less than .1 per cent of the population. We investigate three hypotheses concerning the sources of anti-Shi‘i prejudice, which locate them in social marginalization, religious beliefs and practices, and views about regional politics. The first two hypotheses are drawn from the existing literature, whereas the third is our unique theoretical contribution. Our results, which find support for the connection between individuals’ views about regional politics and anti-Shi‘i prejudice, advance scholarly understanding of religious diversity in the MENA, showing how international developments can trickle down into interpersonal relations to hinder the acceptance and tolerance of sectarian minorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中东和北非对什叶派的偏见的国际来源:来自摩洛哥的原始调查证据
中东和北非国际关系日益宗派化是该地区当代政治的一个决定性特征。伊朗试图增加其在外国什叶派人口中的影响力,而沙特阿拉伯和其他逊尼派政权则采取行动遏制这种影响力。在叙利亚、黎巴嫩和伊拉克等异质和两极分化的中东和北非社会,什叶派在人口中占相当大的比例,并在争夺政治权力,人们很自然地认为,宗派主义可能会加剧对什叶派的紧张和偏见。然而,人们对同质的中东和北非社会知之甚少,在那里,什叶派是一个不寻求政治权力的无限小、不受影响的少数民族。这一主题是通过对摩洛哥2000名受访者进行的具有全国代表性的原始调查进行研究的。我们发现,大约59%的人对摩洛哥什叶派表示人际偏见,对有什叶派邻居的前景表示不安。这种偏见是违背直觉的,因为摩洛哥什叶派是一个极少数民族,不到人口的0.1%。我们研究了关于反什叶派偏见来源的三个假设,这些假设将其定位于社会边缘化、宗教信仰和实践以及对地区政治的看法。前两个假设来自现有文献,而第三个是我们独特的理论贡献。我们的研究结果支持了个人对地区政治的看法与反什叶派偏见之间的联系,促进了学术界对中东和北非地区宗教多样性的理解,表明国际发展如何渗透到人际关系中,阻碍对宗派少数群体的接受和宽容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Mediterranean Politics is the only refereed academic journal to focus on the politics, international relations and political economy of the entire Mediterranean area - "Mediterranean" here being understood to refer to all those countries whose borders are defined partially or wholly by the Mediterranean Sea. This focus involves consideration not only of the region itself, but also the significance of developments there for other parts of the world. The journal analyses the central issues that concern Mediterranean countries and assesses both local and international responses to them. While its prime concern is with political developments, the focus of Mediterranean Politics extends to all the factors and dimensions affecting political life.
期刊最新文献
European neighbourhood policy, the Bologna model and EU-Egyptian cooperation in Higher Education Reframing coercive engineered migration theory: Ceuta and the Western Sahara Measuring ‘state-diffusion’ in post-conflict authoritarian Syria evidence from the 2021 public opinion survey Connecting security with sustainable development in the Eastern Mediterranean and generating pay-offs for the European Union ‘Quietist’ Salafis after the ‘Arab revolts’ in Algeria and Libya (2011–2019): Between insecurity and political subordination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1