Brokers of multiperspectivity in history education in post-conflict societies

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Peace Education Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17400201.2022.2051002
Devon Abbey, B. Wansink
{"title":"Brokers of multiperspectivity in history education in post-conflict societies","authors":"Devon Abbey, B. Wansink","doi":"10.1080/17400201.2022.2051002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In post-conflict societies marked by strong negative stereotypes or delicate and sometimes unstable political contexts, teaching both knowledge and understanding of conflicting historical narratives has become a matter of educational urgency. Conversely, a framework for effective teacher training that prepares teachers to activate and facilitate the exchange of multiple perspectives has yet to be identified. This qualitative and exploratory research aims to answer the questions, what boundaries do expert teacher trainers believe that teachers in post-conflict societies encounter when brokering multiple perspectives in the classroom? Which teaching or training methods can teacher trainers use to help teachers reduce the impact of these boundaries? To advance the use of multiperspectivity in post-conflict history education and enhance history-teacher training design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve experts in history-teacher training to answer these questions. The expert’s statements were openly and axially coded using Bronfenbrenner’s (1979) Ecological Systems Theory as an analytical lens. Identifying ten personal or environmental boundaries to brokering multiperspectivity in the classroom, and two training approaches to help teachers establish continuity between their multiperspectivity training and day-to-day teaching practices. Further providing actionable recommendations for educators, non-governmental organizations, and educational scientists.","PeriodicalId":44502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Peace Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Peace Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2022.2051002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT In post-conflict societies marked by strong negative stereotypes or delicate and sometimes unstable political contexts, teaching both knowledge and understanding of conflicting historical narratives has become a matter of educational urgency. Conversely, a framework for effective teacher training that prepares teachers to activate and facilitate the exchange of multiple perspectives has yet to be identified. This qualitative and exploratory research aims to answer the questions, what boundaries do expert teacher trainers believe that teachers in post-conflict societies encounter when brokering multiple perspectives in the classroom? Which teaching or training methods can teacher trainers use to help teachers reduce the impact of these boundaries? To advance the use of multiperspectivity in post-conflict history education and enhance history-teacher training design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve experts in history-teacher training to answer these questions. The expert’s statements were openly and axially coded using Bronfenbrenner’s (1979) Ecological Systems Theory as an analytical lens. Identifying ten personal or environmental boundaries to brokering multiperspectivity in the classroom, and two training approaches to help teachers establish continuity between their multiperspectivity training and day-to-day teaching practices. Further providing actionable recommendations for educators, non-governmental organizations, and educational scientists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冲突后社会历史教育多视角的中介
在以强烈的负面刻板印象或微妙且有时不稳定的政治背景为特征的冲突后社会中,教授相互冲突的历史叙述的知识和理解已成为教育的紧迫问题。相反,一个有效的教师培训框架,使教师准备激活和促进多种观点的交流,尚未确定。这项定性和探索性研究旨在回答以下问题:专家教师培训师认为,冲突后社会的教师在课堂上协调多种观点时遇到了哪些界限?教师培训师可以使用哪些教学或培训方法来帮助教师减少这些界限的影响?促进多视角在冲突后历史教育中的应用,加强历史教师培训设计。为了回答这些问题,我们对12位历史教师培训专家进行了半结构化访谈。专家的陈述以Bronfenbrenner(1979)的生态系统理论作为分析视角进行公开和轴向编码。确定在课堂中促成多视角的十个个人或环境界限,以及两种培训方法,以帮助教师在多视角培训和日常教学实践之间建立连续性。进一步为教育工作者、非政府组织和教育科学家提供可行的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Peace Education
Journal of Peace Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Case studies on diversity and social justice education Research anthology on modern violence and its impact on society (3 volumes) Education for peace in a peace-friendly context: testing a virtual learning tool to improve teachers’ competencies for conflict transformation in Colombia Education for sustaining peace through historical memory Education for sustaining peace through historical memory by Markus Schultze-Kraft, Switzerland, Palgrave Macmillan, 2022, XI, 119 pp., $49.99 EU (hardback), ISBN 978-3-030-93653-2 Negotiating peace education: the dynamics of bottom-up/top-down integrated/bilingual education initiatives in Israel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1