The effect of adding ivermectin to the standard COVID-19 treatment in intubated patients

Reza Baghbanian, Mohsen Savaie, F. Soltani, Mahbobe Rashidi, Mehrdad Dargahi MalAmir, F. Amiri, N. Bakhtiari
{"title":"The effect of adding ivermectin to the standard COVID-19 treatment in intubated patients","authors":"Reza Baghbanian, Mohsen Savaie, F. Soltani, Mahbobe Rashidi, Mehrdad Dargahi MalAmir, F. Amiri, N. Bakhtiari","doi":"10.34172/npj.2023.10589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Effective antiviral medications with minimal side effects has received scholarly attention since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ivermectin, a long-time anti-parasitic drug, has been proven through laboratory tests to have anti-COVID-19 effects. Objectives: This study investigated the effects of inclusion of ivermectin to the standard treatment of mechanically ventilated patients. Patients and Methods: This study is a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that was conducted on COVID-19 patients, in Ahvaz, Iran, from March 2020 to September 2021. Intubated COVID-19 patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated into two groups, placebo (n = 29) and the ivermectin-treated (n = 31). The primary outcome was the mortality, and the secondary outcomes were pulmonary compliance and vital signs. Results: Two groups were similar regarding demographic characteristics such as age, gender, the length of time since the onset of symptoms before intubation, the level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the blood. Moreover, the difference in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, and interleukin 6 (IL-6) was not significant between the two groups. Regarding mortality rate, no significant difference between the two groups was detected. Furthermore, O2 saturation on day 5 was significantly higher in the ivermectin group as opposed to the control group (P=0.008). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and lung compliance (dynamic and static). Conclusion: Regarding the importance of blood oxygen saturation in COVID-19 patients, our results showed no significant effect of ivermectin in the treatment of ventilated COVID-19 patients, suggesting that its addition to the standard COVID-19 treatment either is ineffective or has no synergistic effect. Trial Registration: The trial protocol was approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (Identifier: IRCT20190417043295N2; https://www.irct.ir/trial/57603, ethical code#IR.AJUMS. REC.1400.234).","PeriodicalId":16388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephropharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/npj.2023.10589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective antiviral medications with minimal side effects has received scholarly attention since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ivermectin, a long-time anti-parasitic drug, has been proven through laboratory tests to have anti-COVID-19 effects. Objectives: This study investigated the effects of inclusion of ivermectin to the standard treatment of mechanically ventilated patients. Patients and Methods: This study is a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that was conducted on COVID-19 patients, in Ahvaz, Iran, from March 2020 to September 2021. Intubated COVID-19 patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated into two groups, placebo (n = 29) and the ivermectin-treated (n = 31). The primary outcome was the mortality, and the secondary outcomes were pulmonary compliance and vital signs. Results: Two groups were similar regarding demographic characteristics such as age, gender, the length of time since the onset of symptoms before intubation, the level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the blood. Moreover, the difference in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, and interleukin 6 (IL-6) was not significant between the two groups. Regarding mortality rate, no significant difference between the two groups was detected. Furthermore, O2 saturation on day 5 was significantly higher in the ivermectin group as opposed to the control group (P=0.008). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and lung compliance (dynamic and static). Conclusion: Regarding the importance of blood oxygen saturation in COVID-19 patients, our results showed no significant effect of ivermectin in the treatment of ventilated COVID-19 patients, suggesting that its addition to the standard COVID-19 treatment either is ineffective or has no synergistic effect. Trial Registration: The trial protocol was approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (Identifier: IRCT20190417043295N2; https://www.irct.ir/trial/57603, ethical code#IR.AJUMS. REC.1400.234).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新冠肺炎插管患者标准治疗中加入伊维菌素的效果
简介:自新冠肺炎大流行开始以来,副作用最小的有效抗病毒药物一直受到学术界的关注。伊维菌素是一种长期的抗寄生虫药物,已通过实验室测试证明具有抗新冠肺炎的效果。目的:本研究探讨了将伊维菌素纳入机械通气患者标准治疗的效果。患者和方法:本研究是一项双盲随机安慰剂对照临床试验,于2020年3月至2021年9月在伊朗阿瓦兹对新冠肺炎患者进行。符合入选标准的插管新冠肺炎患者被随机分为两组,安慰剂组(n=29)和伊维菌素治疗组(n=31)。主要结果是死亡率,次要结果是肺部顺应性和生命体征。结果:两组在人口统计学特征方面相似,如年龄、性别、插管前症状出现的时间长度、血液中乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平。此外,两组之间的血沉(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、D-二聚体和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)差异不显著。关于死亡率,两组之间没有发现显著差异。此外,与对照组相比,伊维菌素组第5天的O2饱和度显著较高(P=0.008)。两组在呼吸频率、心率、收缩压和舒张压以及肺顺应性(动态和静态)方面没有发现统计学上的显著差异。结论:关于新冠肺炎患者血氧饱和度的重要性,我们的研究结果显示伊维菌素在治疗通气性新冠肺炎患者中没有显著效果,表明其在标准新冠肺炎治疗中的添加要么无效,要么没有协同作用。试验注册:试验方案由伊朗临床试验注册处批准(标识符:IRCT201904017043295N2;https://www.irct.ir/trial/57603,道德规范#IR。AJUMS。REC.1400.234)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nephropharmacology
Journal of Nephropharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the effect of montelukast drug in improving the clinical condition of patients with COVID-19 in referral hospitals in Isfahan; a randomized clinical trial Renal insufficiency in breast cancer patients; a review study The Mayo Clinic consensus report on membranous nephropathy; a promising step toward better treating the disease Emerging cancer in individuals with cardiovascular disease: Exploring the intersection of reverse cardio-oncology and nephropharmacology Oncocardiology: close collaboration between oncologists, cardiologists, and nephrologists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1