The Importance of Body Size Standardization in Functional Diversity Studies of Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae)

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY Coleopterists Bulletin Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.1649/0010-065X-76.4.497
V. C. Giménez Gómez, Mattia Tonelli
{"title":"The Importance of Body Size Standardization in Functional Diversity Studies of Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae)","authors":"V. C. Giménez Gómez, Mattia Tonelli","doi":"10.1649/0010-065X-76.4.497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Functional diversity approaches, which are based on an organism's trait pattern, are of increasing interest in ecological studies. However, there are no rules setting the number or kinds of traits that should be assessed; hence, researchers are left to make their own decisions in this regard. Moreover, in some cases, the same trait could be assessed using different procedures, making comparisons between studies potentially difficult. Such is the case of dung beetle body size. We found that it was measured by using eight different methods in the literature. Using three scarabaeine dung beetle species (Canthon quinquemaculatus Castelnau, Deltochilum komareki Balthasar, and Eurysternus parallelus Castelnau), eight methods of measuring dung beetle body size (wet weight, dry weight, wet weight × clypeal-pygidial length, clypeal-pygidial length, pronotal-pygidial length, clypeal-elytral length, pronotal-elytral length, and elytral width × pronotal-elytral length) were compared to determine if they are equivalent. Using a Spearman correlation coefficient, not all the measurement methods were found to be equivalent. Wet and dry weight were the least correlated with all other methods. Hence, to standardize measurement methods in future studies, dry body weight is suggested for use, which also has the advantage of being an easy method to use. Standardization will allow more reliable and accurate comparisons between studies.","PeriodicalId":50668,"journal":{"name":"Coleopterists Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coleopterists Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X-76.4.497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Functional diversity approaches, which are based on an organism's trait pattern, are of increasing interest in ecological studies. However, there are no rules setting the number or kinds of traits that should be assessed; hence, researchers are left to make their own decisions in this regard. Moreover, in some cases, the same trait could be assessed using different procedures, making comparisons between studies potentially difficult. Such is the case of dung beetle body size. We found that it was measured by using eight different methods in the literature. Using three scarabaeine dung beetle species (Canthon quinquemaculatus Castelnau, Deltochilum komareki Balthasar, and Eurysternus parallelus Castelnau), eight methods of measuring dung beetle body size (wet weight, dry weight, wet weight × clypeal-pygidial length, clypeal-pygidial length, pronotal-pygidial length, clypeal-elytral length, pronotal-elytral length, and elytral width × pronotal-elytral length) were compared to determine if they are equivalent. Using a Spearman correlation coefficient, not all the measurement methods were found to be equivalent. Wet and dry weight were the least correlated with all other methods. Hence, to standardize measurement methods in future studies, dry body weight is suggested for use, which also has the advantage of being an easy method to use. Standardization will allow more reliable and accurate comparisons between studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个体大小标准化在甜菜功能多样性研究中的重要性
摘要基于生物体特征模式的功能多样性方法在生态学研究中越来越受到关注。然而,没有规定应该评估的特征的数量或种类;因此,研究人员只能在这方面做出自己的决定。此外,在某些情况下,相同的特征可以使用不同的程序进行评估,这可能会使研究之间的比较变得困难。粪甲虫的体型就是这样。我们发现它是通过使用文献中的八种不同方法来测量的。利用三种金龟子甲(Canthon quiquemaculatus Castelnau、Deltochilum komareki Balthasar和Eurysternus paralleus Castelnou),比较了8种测量金龟子体型的方法(湿重、干重、湿重×鞘翅长、鞘翅长前总长度、鞘翅长度前总长度和鞘翅宽度×鞘翅总长度),以确定它们是否相等。使用斯皮尔曼相关系数,并不是所有的测量方法都是等效的。湿重和干重与所有其他方法的相关性最小。因此,为了在未来的研究中规范测量方法,建议使用干体重,这也是一种易于使用的方法。标准化将使研究之间的比较更加可靠和准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Coleopterists Bulletin
Coleopterists Bulletin 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Founded in 1947 by Ross H. Arnett, Jr., The Coleopterists Bulletin is a refereed quarterly journal, which includes a wide variety of articles on taxonomy and ecology of beetles (Coleoptera). Both members and non-members may submit manuscripts for consideration for publication.
期刊最新文献
Reproductive Interference between Native and Introduced Lady Beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Puerto Rico New Onthophiline Fossil Species (Coleoptera: Histeridae: Onthophilinae) from Mid-Cretaceous Burmese Amber The Coleopterists Society Graduate Student Research Enhancement Awards and Undergraduate Travel Award 2023 Recipients A Morphologically Divergent New Genus and Species of Eurygeniinae from California, USA (Coleoptera: Anthicidae) A New Species of Urophorus (Anophorus) Kirejtshuk, 1990 (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) from Ishigaki-Jima Island, Southern Ryukyu, Southwestern Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1