Novel Biomarker Evaluation in Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid as Disease Indicators for Peri-Implant Health

A. Alsahhaf, E. Alhamdan, Fahim Vohra, T. Abduljabbar, Ziaullah Chaudhry, Isaac Kuyunov
{"title":"Novel Biomarker Evaluation in Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid as Disease Indicators for Peri-Implant Health","authors":"A. Alsahhaf, E. Alhamdan, Fahim Vohra, T. Abduljabbar, Ziaullah Chaudhry, Isaac Kuyunov","doi":"10.1166/jbt.2023.3293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess various inflammatory biomarkers CCL-20, BAF, RANK-L, IL-23, and osteoprotegerin from PICF along with clinical parameters in participants with peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Material and Methods: Participants were gathered i.e., 30 with\n periimplantitis, 32 with peri-implant mucositis, and 32 healthy. Peri-implant parameters PIPD, BoP, and PIPI were measured in all participants. PICF samples were collected to assess the level of biomarkers CCL-20; BAF; IL-23; RANK-L, and OPG. For periodontal parameters, ranges and means were\n measured. Kruskal Wallis test was used for comparison between groups. For categorical data sets, the Pearson Chi-Square test was applied. The Bonferroni test was used for multiple comparisons. Results: Peri-implant parameter BoP in peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis was significantly\n higher compared to controls (p < 0.05). PIPD with healthy peri-implant conditions was, significantly less compared to peri-implantitis, and peri-implant mucositis (p<0.05). PIPI demonstrated no significant difference throughout different peri-implant conditions. CCL-20\n ng/mL in patients with peri-implant mucositis was found to be significantly higher (p < 0.05). BAF levels in peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis were comparable. The concentration of IL-23 ng/mL was found to be significantly lower in healthy controls (p < 0.05).\n Conclusion: Inflammatory biomarkers showed high levels of PICF in peri-implant disease patients compared to healthy controls. Individuals with peri-implant conditions experience the poor peri-implant probing depth and bleeding on probing.","PeriodicalId":15300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1166/jbt.2023.3293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess various inflammatory biomarkers CCL-20, BAF, RANK-L, IL-23, and osteoprotegerin from PICF along with clinical parameters in participants with peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Material and Methods: Participants were gathered i.e., 30 with periimplantitis, 32 with peri-implant mucositis, and 32 healthy. Peri-implant parameters PIPD, BoP, and PIPI were measured in all participants. PICF samples were collected to assess the level of biomarkers CCL-20; BAF; IL-23; RANK-L, and OPG. For periodontal parameters, ranges and means were measured. Kruskal Wallis test was used for comparison between groups. For categorical data sets, the Pearson Chi-Square test was applied. The Bonferroni test was used for multiple comparisons. Results: Peri-implant parameter BoP in peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis was significantly higher compared to controls (p < 0.05). PIPD with healthy peri-implant conditions was, significantly less compared to peri-implantitis, and peri-implant mucositis (p<0.05). PIPI demonstrated no significant difference throughout different peri-implant conditions. CCL-20 ng/mL in patients with peri-implant mucositis was found to be significantly higher (p < 0.05). BAF levels in peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis were comparable. The concentration of IL-23 ng/mL was found to be significantly lower in healthy controls (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Inflammatory biomarkers showed high levels of PICF in peri-implant disease patients compared to healthy controls. Individuals with peri-implant conditions experience the poor peri-implant probing depth and bleeding on probing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型生物标志物评价在种植体周围沟液作为种植体周围健康的疾病指标
目的:评估PICF的各种炎症生物标志物CCL-20、BAF、RANK-L、IL-23和骨保护素以及种植体周围粘膜炎和种植体周围炎参与者的临床参数。材料与方法:研究对象为种植体周围炎患者30例,种植体周围黏膜炎患者32例,健康患者32例。所有受试者均测量种植体周围参数PIPD、BoP和PIPI。采集PICF样本,评估生物标志物CCL-20水平;BAF;IL-23;RANK-L和OPG。对于牙周参数,测量范围和平均值。组间比较采用Kruskal Wallis检验。对于分类数据集,采用皮尔逊卡方检验。采用Bonferroni检验进行多重比较。结果:种植体周围黏膜炎和种植体周围炎组种植体周围参数BoP显著高于对照组(p < 0.05)。与种植体周围炎和种植体周围粘膜炎相比,健康种植体周围的PIPD显著减少(p<0.05)。PIPI在不同种植体周围条件下无显著差异。CCL-20 ng/mL在种植体周围黏膜炎患者中明显升高(p < 0.05)。种植体周围炎和种植体周围粘膜炎的BAF水平具有可比性。正常对照组IL-23 ng/mL浓度明显降低(p < 0.05)。结论:与健康对照组相比,炎症生物标志物显示种植体周围疾病患者PICF水平较高。有种植体周围条件的个体会经历种植体周围探查深度差和探查时出血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
332
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Occupational stress in clinical and non-clinical staff in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS): a cross-sectional study. The Real-Time Detection of Mouse Double Minute-2 mRNA Expression in Living Cells with the Gold Nanoparticle (Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Vol. 8(1), pp. 27–34 (2018)) The Predictive Value of Conventional Ultrasound Signs Plus Serological Indices for Neck Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Cancer Significant Effect of Ritodrine Hydrochloride Combined with Magnesium Sulfate for Treatment of Patients with Premature Rupture of Membranes Application and Potential of Nanobiomaterials in Bone Regeneration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1