A. Alsahhaf, E. Alhamdan, Fahim Vohra, T. Abduljabbar, Ziaullah Chaudhry, Isaac Kuyunov
{"title":"Novel Biomarker Evaluation in Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid as Disease Indicators for Peri-Implant Health","authors":"A. Alsahhaf, E. Alhamdan, Fahim Vohra, T. Abduljabbar, Ziaullah Chaudhry, Isaac Kuyunov","doi":"10.1166/jbt.2023.3293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess various inflammatory biomarkers CCL-20, BAF, RANK-L, IL-23, and osteoprotegerin from PICF along with clinical parameters in participants with peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Material and Methods: Participants were gathered i.e., 30 with\n periimplantitis, 32 with peri-implant mucositis, and 32 healthy. Peri-implant parameters PIPD, BoP, and PIPI were measured in all participants. PICF samples were collected to assess the level of biomarkers CCL-20; BAF; IL-23; RANK-L, and OPG. For periodontal parameters, ranges and means were\n measured. Kruskal Wallis test was used for comparison between groups. For categorical data sets, the Pearson Chi-Square test was applied. The Bonferroni test was used for multiple comparisons. Results: Peri-implant parameter BoP in peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis was significantly\n higher compared to controls (p < 0.05). PIPD with healthy peri-implant conditions was, significantly less compared to peri-implantitis, and peri-implant mucositis (p<0.05). PIPI demonstrated no significant difference throughout different peri-implant conditions. CCL-20\n ng/mL in patients with peri-implant mucositis was found to be significantly higher (p < 0.05). BAF levels in peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis were comparable. The concentration of IL-23 ng/mL was found to be significantly lower in healthy controls (p < 0.05).\n Conclusion: Inflammatory biomarkers showed high levels of PICF in peri-implant disease patients compared to healthy controls. Individuals with peri-implant conditions experience the poor peri-implant probing depth and bleeding on probing.","PeriodicalId":15300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1166/jbt.2023.3293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess various inflammatory biomarkers CCL-20, BAF, RANK-L, IL-23, and osteoprotegerin from PICF along with clinical parameters in participants with peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Material and Methods: Participants were gathered i.e., 30 with
periimplantitis, 32 with peri-implant mucositis, and 32 healthy. Peri-implant parameters PIPD, BoP, and PIPI were measured in all participants. PICF samples were collected to assess the level of biomarkers CCL-20; BAF; IL-23; RANK-L, and OPG. For periodontal parameters, ranges and means were
measured. Kruskal Wallis test was used for comparison between groups. For categorical data sets, the Pearson Chi-Square test was applied. The Bonferroni test was used for multiple comparisons. Results: Peri-implant parameter BoP in peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis was significantly
higher compared to controls (p < 0.05). PIPD with healthy peri-implant conditions was, significantly less compared to peri-implantitis, and peri-implant mucositis (p<0.05). PIPI demonstrated no significant difference throughout different peri-implant conditions. CCL-20
ng/mL in patients with peri-implant mucositis was found to be significantly higher (p < 0.05). BAF levels in peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis were comparable. The concentration of IL-23 ng/mL was found to be significantly lower in healthy controls (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Inflammatory biomarkers showed high levels of PICF in peri-implant disease patients compared to healthy controls. Individuals with peri-implant conditions experience the poor peri-implant probing depth and bleeding on probing.