Quality Assessment Statistic Evaluation of X-Ray Fluorescence via NIST and IAEA Standard Reference Materials

O. Ahmed, F. Habbani, A. M. Mustafa, E. Mohamed, A. M. Salih, Ftihia Seedig
{"title":"Quality Assessment Statistic Evaluation of X-Ray Fluorescence via NIST and IAEA Standard Reference Materials","authors":"O. Ahmed, F. Habbani, A. M. Mustafa, E. Mohamed, A. M. Salih, Ftihia Seedig","doi":"10.4236/WJNST.2017.72010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is a quality assessment of X-ray fluorescence laboratory located at the University of Khartoum. The X-ray fluorescence spectrometer system consists, a set of three 109Cd sources of an initial nominal activity of 10 μCi, and Si(Li) detector Energy Dispersive XRF(EDXRF) systems. It is important to carry out this work because it has an effective contribution for a wide range of research and services. The assessment was carried out by measuring 8 NIST-2709a (soil) and 13 IAEA-155 (milk powder) standard reference material samples for repeatability examinations to test the measurement precision. The total combined standards uncertainty values for XRF lab were estimated by an error from repeatability measurements adding 2.6% for error propagation related to the method. For accuracy assessment, three standard statistic approaches were applied, i.e. the Bias %, zeta-score, and En-number. The bias of all elements for both standard materials was found to be within a deviation range from −28% to 7.8%. The results of all elements for both the zeta-score test and En-number have satisfactory results except Th (Thorium) and Zr (Zirconium) which consider as questionable results for NIST SRM 2709a and unsatisfactory results for En-number.","PeriodicalId":61566,"journal":{"name":"核科学与技术国际期刊(英文)","volume":"07 1","pages":"121-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"核科学与技术国际期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/WJNST.2017.72010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The aim of this study is a quality assessment of X-ray fluorescence laboratory located at the University of Khartoum. The X-ray fluorescence spectrometer system consists, a set of three 109Cd sources of an initial nominal activity of 10 μCi, and Si(Li) detector Energy Dispersive XRF(EDXRF) systems. It is important to carry out this work because it has an effective contribution for a wide range of research and services. The assessment was carried out by measuring 8 NIST-2709a (soil) and 13 IAEA-155 (milk powder) standard reference material samples for repeatability examinations to test the measurement precision. The total combined standards uncertainty values for XRF lab were estimated by an error from repeatability measurements adding 2.6% for error propagation related to the method. For accuracy assessment, three standard statistic approaches were applied, i.e. the Bias %, zeta-score, and En-number. The bias of all elements for both standard materials was found to be within a deviation range from −28% to 7.8%. The results of all elements for both the zeta-score test and En-number have satisfactory results except Th (Thorium) and Zr (Zirconium) which consider as questionable results for NIST SRM 2709a and unsatisfactory results for En-number.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过NIST和IAEA标准参比物质对x射线荧光进行质量评价和统计评价
本研究的目的是对喀土穆大学X射线荧光实验室进行质量评估。X射线荧光光谱仪系统由三个初始标称活性为10μCi的109Cd源和Si(Li)探测器能量分散XRF(EDXRF)系统组成。开展这项工作很重要,因为它对广泛的研究和服务做出了有效贡献。通过测量8个NIST-2709a(土壤)和13个IAEA-155(奶粉)标准参考物质样品进行重复性检查,以测试测量精度。XRF实验室的总组合标准不确定度值是通过重复性测量的误差估计的,与该方法相关的误差传播增加了2.6%。对于准确性评估,采用了三种标准统计方法,即偏差%、ζ评分和En数。两种标准材料的所有元素的偏差都在-28%-7.8%的偏差范围内。ζ值测试和En值的所有元素结果都令人满意,但Th(钍)和Zr(锆)除外,它们被认为是NIST SRM 2709a的可疑结果,En值不令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
198
期刊最新文献
System Variables Design of Safety Analysis for Fast Reactors Numerical Analysis of Heating Technique in Corium Melt Pool Convection Flow Field & Thermal Interaction in a Volumetrically Heated Molten Pool Feasibility to Convert the NuScale SMR from UO2 to a Mixed (U, Th)O2 Core: A Parametric Study of Fuel Element—Seed-Blanket Concept Cause Analysis for Wall Thinning of Small-Bore Piping in Nuclear Power Plant by ToSPACE, FLUENT and Theoretical Evaluation The Systematics Study of (n, p) Reaction Cross-Sections at 14.7 MeV Neutron Energy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1