{"title":"Azcárraga’s critique of mercantilism: trade as an engine of growth","authors":"E. de Dios","doi":"10.37907/5erp2202j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manuel Azcárraga y Palmero's La libertad de comercio en las islas Filipinas (1872) was an unequivocal and consistent tract advocating free trade as a commercial policy for the Philippines. It is remarkable for its explicit and frequent reference to free-trade theory and the example of other nations (notably Britain and its colonies) as a guide to policy. It uses a historical approach in its critique of Spanish mercantilist ideas and biases, which are held responsible for centuries of foregone development opportunities for the Philippines. This article traces Azcárraga’s arguments and links them to Smith’s [1776] theory of international trade and its later elaborations (Myint [1958, 1977] and Schumacher [2015, 2016]). The protectionist mindset and policies Azcárraga believed to have held back Philippine progress one hundred !fty years ago are a striking portent of issues hounding the country’s development in the 20th century and even later.","PeriodicalId":91420,"journal":{"name":"The Philippine review of economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Philippine review of economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37907/5erp2202j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Manuel Azcárraga y Palmero's La libertad de comercio en las islas Filipinas (1872) was an unequivocal and consistent tract advocating free trade as a commercial policy for the Philippines. It is remarkable for its explicit and frequent reference to free-trade theory and the example of other nations (notably Britain and its colonies) as a guide to policy. It uses a historical approach in its critique of Spanish mercantilist ideas and biases, which are held responsible for centuries of foregone development opportunities for the Philippines. This article traces Azcárraga’s arguments and links them to Smith’s [1776] theory of international trade and its later elaborations (Myint [1958, 1977] and Schumacher [2015, 2016]). The protectionist mindset and policies Azcárraga believed to have held back Philippine progress one hundred !fty years ago are a striking portent of issues hounding the country’s development in the 20th century and even later.
Manuel Azcárraga y Palmero的La libertad de commercicio en las islas Philippines(1872)是一本毫不含糊且始终如一的小册子,主张将自由贸易作为菲律宾的商业政策。值得注意的是,它明确而频繁地引用自由贸易理论,并以其他国家(尤其是英国及其殖民地)为例作为政策指南。它在批判西班牙重商主义思想和偏见时采用了一种历史的方法,这种思想和偏见导致菲律宾几个世纪以来失去了发展机会。本文追溯Azcárraga的论点,并将其与史密斯[1776]的国际贸易理论及其后来的阐述(Myint[1958, 1977]和Schumacher[2015, 2016])联系起来。据信,保护主义思想和政策Azcárraga在100年前阻碍了菲律宾的进步,这是20世纪乃至以后困扰菲律宾发展的问题的一个突出征兆。