The attraction of talent through international student mobility patterns and triple helix system: evidence from OECD countries for triple helix system

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/03796205.2022.2127422
O. Sudibor, H. Ünlü
{"title":"The attraction of talent through international student mobility patterns and triple helix system: evidence from OECD countries for triple helix system","authors":"O. Sudibor, H. Ünlü","doi":"10.1080/03796205.2022.2127422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the new century of the knowledge economy, highly trained human capital is anticipated to stimulate economic growth, becoming one of the grounds for competition – the “war for talent.” The business sector, higher education and talent are all crucially connected. Integration into international knowledge networks may be enhanced by the country’s domestic triple helix. International knowledge transfer, national innovation systems and national triple helix systems draw international talent flows because of their economic benefits. To examine a nation’s ability to draw talent, we utilise a two-stage error correction (EC2SLS) panel model for OECD countries between the years 2013 and 2017. We assume that it is influenced by several innovative and technological aspects, including the triple helix, international student mobility and other factors. Results indicate that when we compare low-middle-income nations with high-income countries, the attraction of talent may alter when taking into account university–industry relationships. It has been observed that low-middle-income countries need to exert more effort in university–industry collaborations than high-income ones to recruit more talent. Evidence suggests that nations seeking to recruit talent should target international students. In addition, nations may focus on public institutions, the labour market and innovation. Governments and companies should be proactive in the competition for international talent, the results show. These results add clarity to the debate over how international student mobility affects knowledge creation and emphasise the significance of university–industry collaboration in luring talent to nations with disparate income levels.","PeriodicalId":55873,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","volume":"46 1","pages":"149 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03796205.2022.2127422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the new century of the knowledge economy, highly trained human capital is anticipated to stimulate economic growth, becoming one of the grounds for competition – the “war for talent.” The business sector, higher education and talent are all crucially connected. Integration into international knowledge networks may be enhanced by the country’s domestic triple helix. International knowledge transfer, national innovation systems and national triple helix systems draw international talent flows because of their economic benefits. To examine a nation’s ability to draw talent, we utilise a two-stage error correction (EC2SLS) panel model for OECD countries between the years 2013 and 2017. We assume that it is influenced by several innovative and technological aspects, including the triple helix, international student mobility and other factors. Results indicate that when we compare low-middle-income nations with high-income countries, the attraction of talent may alter when taking into account university–industry relationships. It has been observed that low-middle-income countries need to exert more effort in university–industry collaborations than high-income ones to recruit more talent. Evidence suggests that nations seeking to recruit talent should target international students. In addition, nations may focus on public institutions, the labour market and innovation. Governments and companies should be proactive in the competition for international talent, the results show. These results add clarity to the debate over how international student mobility affects knowledge creation and emphasise the significance of university–industry collaboration in luring talent to nations with disparate income levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过国际学生流动模式和三螺旋系统吸引人才:来自经合组织国家的三螺旋系统证据
摘要在知识经济的新世纪,训练有素的人力资本有望刺激经济增长,成为竞争的基础之一——“人才之战”。商业部门、高等教育和人才都有着至关重要的联系。该国国内的三重螺旋结构可能会加强与国际知识网络的融合。国际知识转移、国家创新体系和国家三螺旋体系因其经济效益吸引了国际人才流动。为了检验一个国家吸引人才的能力,我们使用了2013年至2017年间经合组织国家的两阶段纠错(EC2SLS)面板模型。我们假设它受到几个创新和技术方面的影响,包括三重螺旋、国际学生流动性和其他因素。结果表明,当我们将中低收入国家与高收入国家进行比较时,考虑到大学与产业的关系,人才的吸引力可能会发生变化。有人观察到,与高收入国家相比,中低收入国家需要在大学与产业合作方面付出更多努力,以招募更多人才。有证据表明,寻求招聘人才的国家应该以国际学生为目标。此外,各国可以把重点放在公共机构、劳动力市场和创新上。研究结果显示,政府和企业应该积极主动地参与国际人才的竞争。这些结果澄清了关于国际学生流动性如何影响知识创造的争论,并强调了大学与行业合作在吸引人才到不同收入水平国家方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics
Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Published by the Bureau for Economic Research and the Graduate School of Business, University of Stellenbosch. Articles in the field of study of Economics (in the widest sense of the word).
期刊最新文献
Structural estimates of the South African sacrifice ratio Central Bank Independence and Inflation in India: The Role of Financial Development Threshold effects of regional fiscal stress index on employment Benchmarking an allocation to the foreign Sub-portfolio from a South African perspective Assessment of the impact of government response measures on the spread of COVID-19: panel data evidence for 50 countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1