Editorial

A. Ezzo
{"title":"Editorial","authors":"A. Ezzo","doi":"10.1080/10496505.2018.1443637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to issue 19(2) of the Journal of Agricultural & Food Information! The issue opens with a Society of the Quarter column by Tom Volkening who revisits an organization first profiled in 2006: Seed Savers Exchange, a non-profit dedicated to preserving America’s agricultural heritage through the growing, saving and sharing of heirloom seeds and plants—over 20,000 varieties! In the lead refereed contribution, Robert McGeachin reports the results of his case study to assess processing times associated with various steps in a digitization project—e.g., scanning, file conversion, quality control, metadata creation ingestion into a repository—and they are significant! Those contemplating a digitization project will find his results instructive when factoring in their own human resource costs. Next, Wayne Ganpat, Kathiravan Gopalan, and Joel Dalrymple share insights from their study examining the extent to which Trinidadian consumers made use of nutritional information on product labels to inform food choices. Their findings have implications for national health: although the reading of labels was generally high, insufficient attention was paid to fat and sodium content. Two contributions explore the potential of mobile phone in extension services, from the perspective of both agents and farmers. Mohammad Sadegh Allahyari, Maryam Ranjbar Atashi, and Emily Shea Dunn investigate the feasibility of agents usingmobile technology as an educational tool to replacemore traditional extension methods in Iran; Victor Otene, Jacqueline Ezihe, and Felix Torgenga assess mobile phone usage among farmers in Nigeria. In both cases, economic/income factors, education/skill, and infrastructure/network coverage were major barriers to use. The final three articles examine farmers’ use of information sources to inform agricultural production for various crops. Muhammad Yaseen, Mokbul Ahmad, and Peeyush Soni studied cotton growers in Pakistan and found that they primarily relied on social networks and traditional media and less on extension and modern ICTs. Yeong Sheng Tey et al. surveyed Malaysian vegetable farmers’ sources of information on sustainable practices: extension and family/friends ranked highest. In contrast, the urban mushroom farmers studied by Kwabena Bugyei, Raphael Kavi, Grace Obeng-Koranteng, and Benjamin Folitse in Ghana had ample access to information from multiple sources; unfortunately, over 50% were unaware of them or lacked the technical know-how to apply the information—a useful reminder that information is only one variable in the technology adoption equation.","PeriodicalId":43986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information","volume":"19 1","pages":"105 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10496505.2018.1443637","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural & Food Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2018.1443637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Welcome to issue 19(2) of the Journal of Agricultural & Food Information! The issue opens with a Society of the Quarter column by Tom Volkening who revisits an organization first profiled in 2006: Seed Savers Exchange, a non-profit dedicated to preserving America’s agricultural heritage through the growing, saving and sharing of heirloom seeds and plants—over 20,000 varieties! In the lead refereed contribution, Robert McGeachin reports the results of his case study to assess processing times associated with various steps in a digitization project—e.g., scanning, file conversion, quality control, metadata creation ingestion into a repository—and they are significant! Those contemplating a digitization project will find his results instructive when factoring in their own human resource costs. Next, Wayne Ganpat, Kathiravan Gopalan, and Joel Dalrymple share insights from their study examining the extent to which Trinidadian consumers made use of nutritional information on product labels to inform food choices. Their findings have implications for national health: although the reading of labels was generally high, insufficient attention was paid to fat and sodium content. Two contributions explore the potential of mobile phone in extension services, from the perspective of both agents and farmers. Mohammad Sadegh Allahyari, Maryam Ranjbar Atashi, and Emily Shea Dunn investigate the feasibility of agents usingmobile technology as an educational tool to replacemore traditional extension methods in Iran; Victor Otene, Jacqueline Ezihe, and Felix Torgenga assess mobile phone usage among farmers in Nigeria. In both cases, economic/income factors, education/skill, and infrastructure/network coverage were major barriers to use. The final three articles examine farmers’ use of information sources to inform agricultural production for various crops. Muhammad Yaseen, Mokbul Ahmad, and Peeyush Soni studied cotton growers in Pakistan and found that they primarily relied on social networks and traditional media and less on extension and modern ICTs. Yeong Sheng Tey et al. surveyed Malaysian vegetable farmers’ sources of information on sustainable practices: extension and family/friends ranked highest. In contrast, the urban mushroom farmers studied by Kwabena Bugyei, Raphael Kavi, Grace Obeng-Koranteng, and Benjamin Folitse in Ghana had ample access to information from multiple sources; unfortunately, over 50% were unaware of them or lacked the technical know-how to apply the information—a useful reminder that information is only one variable in the technology adoption equation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编辑
欢迎收看《农业与食品信息杂志》第19期第2期!本期以Tom Volkening的《四分之一学会》专栏开篇,他回顾了2006年首次介绍的一个组织:种子保存者交流,这是一家非营利组织,致力于通过种植、保存和分享传家宝种子和植物来保护美国的农业遗产——超过20000个品种!在主要参考的贡献中,Robert McGeachin报告了他的案例研究结果,以评估数字化项目中与各个步骤相关的处理时间,例如扫描、文件转换、质量控制、元数据创建到存储库中,这些都非常重要!考虑到自己的人力资源成本,那些考虑数字化项目的人会发现他的结果很有启发性。接下来,Wayne Ganpat、Kathiravan Gopalan和Joel Dalrymple分享了他们研究的见解,该研究考察了特立尼达消费者在多大程度上利用产品标签上的营养信息来告知食品选择。他们的发现对国民健康有影响:尽管标签的读数通常很高,但对脂肪和钠含量的关注不够。两项贡献从代理商和农民的角度探讨了移动电话在推广服务中的潜力。Mohammad Sadegh Allahyari、Maryam Ranjbar Atashi和Emily Shea Dunn调查了代理商使用移动技术作为教育工具来取代伊朗更传统的推广方法的可行性;Victor Otene、Jacqueline Ezihe和Felix Torgenga评估了尼日利亚农民的手机使用情况。在这两种情况下,经济/收入因素、教育/技能和基础设施/网络覆盖率都是使用的主要障碍。最后三篇文章考察了农民利用信息来源为各种作物的农业生产提供信息的情况。Muhammad Yaseen、Mokbul Ahmad和Peeyush Soni研究了巴基斯坦的棉花种植者,发现他们主要依赖社交网络和传统媒体,较少依赖推广和现代信息通信技术。Yeong Sheng Tey等人调查了马来西亚菜农关于可持续做法的信息来源:推广和家人/朋友排名最高。相比之下,Kwabena Bugyei、Raphael Kavi、Grace Obeng Koranteng和Benjamin Folitse在加纳研究的城市蘑菇种植户能够充分获得来自多个来源的信息;不幸的是,超过50%的人不知道这些信息,或者缺乏应用这些信息的技术知识——这是一个有用的提醒,即信息只是技术采用等式中的一个变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
The Development of Search Filters for One Health Articles Using CAB Abstracts Descriptors Agriculture-Related Courses in Canadian Universities: How Course Outlines Differ between Social Science and Science Faculties Review of Farming Systems and Food Security in Africa: Priorities for Science and Policy under Global Change Editorial An Analysis of Online Research Guides for Wine, Enology, and Viticulture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1