“You come up from the ashes, and you’re like a phoenix.” Survivors of sex trafficking define resilience

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK Qualitative Social Work Pub Date : 2023-02-03 DOI:10.1177/14733250231152263
Logan Knight, Susan H. Yoon
{"title":"“You come up from the ashes, and you’re like a phoenix.” Survivors of sex trafficking define resilience","authors":"Logan Knight, Susan H. Yoon","doi":"10.1177/14733250231152263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of resilience has largely relied on definitions and conceptualizations of resilience produced by academia, with little of the knowledge produced being grounded in the experience and perspectives of those outside academia. The voices of marginalized and stressed populations are particularly rarely integrated into sanctioned institutional discourses of knowledge, reproducing inequality where these institutions have influence. Specifically, little research has explored the ways in which survivors of sex trafficking define and conceptualize resilience. Thus, academic inquiry into survivor resilience may risk missing what is important to survivors themselves regarding the issue. Using thematic analysis, this study explored survivors’ responses to the question “What does ‘resilience’ mean to you?”, which resulted in five themes: resilience as (1) resistance, (2) transition, (3) a sustained force over time, (4) transformation, and (5) resources. Participants defined resilience as being primarily a person-centered phenomenon, rather than a process-centered phenomenon, that was the output of their inherent and enduring personal power to survive or overcome and adversity, and to shape their lives in preferred ways despite adversity. Differing from academic definitions of resilience in several significant ways, participants conceptualized resilience as being promoted by external resources and opportunities but existent even in the absence of such resource and opportunities. Findings suggest that for resilience inquiry to resonate with survivors, it must first acknowledge the inherent power of survivors.","PeriodicalId":47677,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Social Work","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250231152263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study of resilience has largely relied on definitions and conceptualizations of resilience produced by academia, with little of the knowledge produced being grounded in the experience and perspectives of those outside academia. The voices of marginalized and stressed populations are particularly rarely integrated into sanctioned institutional discourses of knowledge, reproducing inequality where these institutions have influence. Specifically, little research has explored the ways in which survivors of sex trafficking define and conceptualize resilience. Thus, academic inquiry into survivor resilience may risk missing what is important to survivors themselves regarding the issue. Using thematic analysis, this study explored survivors’ responses to the question “What does ‘resilience’ mean to you?”, which resulted in five themes: resilience as (1) resistance, (2) transition, (3) a sustained force over time, (4) transformation, and (5) resources. Participants defined resilience as being primarily a person-centered phenomenon, rather than a process-centered phenomenon, that was the output of their inherent and enduring personal power to survive or overcome and adversity, and to shape their lives in preferred ways despite adversity. Differing from academic definitions of resilience in several significant ways, participants conceptualized resilience as being promoted by external resources and opportunities but existent even in the absence of such resource and opportunities. Findings suggest that for resilience inquiry to resonate with survivors, it must first acknowledge the inherent power of survivors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“你从灰烬中复活,就像一只凤凰。”性交易的幸存者定义了韧性
关于复原力的研究在很大程度上依赖于学术界对复原力的定义和概念,而所产生的知识很少基于学术界以外的人的经验和观点。边缘化和压力人群的声音很少被纳入认可的知识机构话语,在这些机构有影响力的地方再现了不平等。具体而言,很少有研究探讨性贩运幸存者如何定义和概念化复原力。因此,对幸存者复原力的学术调查可能会错过对幸存者自己来说重要的问题。通过主题分析,本研究探讨了幸存者对“‘复原力’对你意味着什么?”问题的回答,得出了五个主题:复原力是(1)抵抗,(2)过渡,(3)随着时间的推移是一种持续的力量,(4)转变,以及(5)资源。参与者将韧性定义为主要是一种以人为中心的现象,而不是一种以过程为中心的现象。这是他们内在和持久的个人力量的输出,能够在逆境中生存或克服逆境,并在逆境中以偏好的方式塑造自己的生活。与学术界对复原力的定义在几个重要方面不同,参与者将复原力概念化为由外部资源和机会推动的,但即使在缺乏这些资源和机会的情况下也存在。调查结果表明,要想让复原力调查引起幸存者的共鸣,它必须首先承认幸存者的内在力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Qualitative Social Work provides a forum for those interested in qualitative research and evaluation and in qualitative approaches to practice. The journal facilitates interactive dialogue and integration between those interested in qualitative research and methodology and those involved in the world of practice. It reflects the fact that these worlds are increasingly international and interdisciplinary in nature. The journal is a forum for rigorous dialogue that promotes qualitatively informed professional practice and inquiry.
期刊最新文献
Toward a creative and imaginative research approach: Collage as a method of inquiry in social work Book review: Time In this issue… How conversations can empower and involve: Building the evidence for Approved Mental Health Professionals’ communicative practices Themes do not emerge. An editor’s reflections on the use of Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1