Diagnostic Yield of Serial Sputum Smear Microscopy Examination at Different Institutional Settings

D. Desalegn
{"title":"Diagnostic Yield of Serial Sputum Smear Microscopy Examination at Different Institutional Settings","authors":"D. Desalegn","doi":"10.4172/2329-891X.1000294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Number of samples and time of sputum collection has a great impact on the positivity yield of sputum smear microscopy examination. However, the impact is not yet extensively studied in Ethiopia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the serials sputum sample collection impacts on the diagnostic yield of smear microscopy examination in Ethiopia at variation at different institutional settings. \nMethods: Institution based retrospective cohort study was conducted from October 2011 to March 2016. Two thousand four hundred sixty-three sputum smear microscopy positive result were reviewed from TB patient records. The collected data were computerized using Epi-info software and analyzed using SPSS version 20 software. Numerical summaries were used to describe the positivity yield of spot, morning and spot (SMS) sputum smear microscopy examination. \nResults: Of 2463 sputum smear-positive TB cases, 2384 (96.8%), 2458 (99.8%) and 2394 (97.2%) were detected by the first spot, morning and second spot sputum smear microscopy diagnosis, respectively. On the other hand, morning sputum smear results had the incremental yield of 74 (3.0%) and 64 (2.6%) from first spot sample and second spot sample, respectively. The results of 1892 (76.8%) TB cases were in agreement (detected) by three consecutive sputum specimen (SMS). \nConclusion: The three consecutive sputum smear microscopy examination had 3% incremental yield compare to spot-spot (SS). The hospitals were participating in International External Quality Assurance Schemes (IEQAS) had better incremental (increased) yield in both SMS and SS approach compared to the health centers. Hence, strong TB quality assurances systems should be implemented in respective health facilities before practicing two spots (SS) sputum smear microscopy diagnostic approach as routine to TB laboratory diagnostic method.","PeriodicalId":74002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of tropical diseases & public health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of tropical diseases & public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-891X.1000294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Number of samples and time of sputum collection has a great impact on the positivity yield of sputum smear microscopy examination. However, the impact is not yet extensively studied in Ethiopia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the serials sputum sample collection impacts on the diagnostic yield of smear microscopy examination in Ethiopia at variation at different institutional settings. Methods: Institution based retrospective cohort study was conducted from October 2011 to March 2016. Two thousand four hundred sixty-three sputum smear microscopy positive result were reviewed from TB patient records. The collected data were computerized using Epi-info software and analyzed using SPSS version 20 software. Numerical summaries were used to describe the positivity yield of spot, morning and spot (SMS) sputum smear microscopy examination. Results: Of 2463 sputum smear-positive TB cases, 2384 (96.8%), 2458 (99.8%) and 2394 (97.2%) were detected by the first spot, morning and second spot sputum smear microscopy diagnosis, respectively. On the other hand, morning sputum smear results had the incremental yield of 74 (3.0%) and 64 (2.6%) from first spot sample and second spot sample, respectively. The results of 1892 (76.8%) TB cases were in agreement (detected) by three consecutive sputum specimen (SMS). Conclusion: The three consecutive sputum smear microscopy examination had 3% incremental yield compare to spot-spot (SS). The hospitals were participating in International External Quality Assurance Schemes (IEQAS) had better incremental (increased) yield in both SMS and SS approach compared to the health centers. Hence, strong TB quality assurances systems should be implemented in respective health facilities before practicing two spots (SS) sputum smear microscopy diagnostic approach as routine to TB laboratory diagnostic method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同机构连续痰涂片显微镜检查的诊断率
摘要:痰液采集的样本数和时间对痰液涂片镜检的阳性率有很大影响。然而,埃塞俄比亚尚未对其影响进行广泛研究。因此,本研究的目的是评估连续痰样本采集对涂片镜检诊断率的影响,在埃塞俄比亚不同的机构设置的变化。方法:2011年10月至2016年3月进行基于机构的回顾性队列研究。从结核病患者记录中回顾了2,463例痰涂片镜检阳性结果。收集的数据采用Epi-info软件进行计算机化处理,采用SPSS 20版软件进行分析。用数值总结的方法描述了斑、晨、斑(SMS)痰涂片镜检的阳性率。结果:2463例痰涂片阳性结核患者中,第1点、早晨和第2点痰涂片镜检检出分别为2384例(96.8%)、2458例(99.8%)和2394例(97.2%)。另一方面,早晨痰涂片结果从第一个斑点样本和第二个斑点样本分别增加了74个(3.0%)和64个(2.6%)。1892例(76.8%)结核患者连续3次痰检结果符合(检出)。结论:连续三次痰涂片镜检比单点镜检的产率增加3%。参与国际外部质量保证计划(IEQAS)的医院与卫生中心相比,SMS和SS方法的增量(增加)收益更好。因此,在将两点痰涂片镜检诊断方法作为常规结核病实验室诊断方法之前,应在各自的卫生机构实施强有力的结核病质量保证体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Malnutrition Among Elderly. A Community Based Cross Sectional Study From Ernakulam Kerala Fractionation of methanolic extracts from two herbaceous plants and evaluation of their larvicidal activity on Anopheles arabiensis. Covid-19 in the elderly: Insight into Symptomatology. Malaria as a public health problem and SWOT analysis of program approach-A Case Study from Baran District Rajasthan REVIEW ON EPIDEMIOLOGY OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE (FMD) IN ETHIOPIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1