Factors influencing subjective walkability: Results from built environment audit data

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Transport and Land Use Pub Date : 2022-11-14 DOI:10.5198/jtlu.2022.2234
Lancelot Rodrigue, Julie Daley, L. Ravensbergen, Kevin Manaugh, Rania Wasfi, Gregory P Butler, A. El-geneidy
{"title":"Factors influencing subjective walkability: Results from built environment audit data","authors":"Lancelot Rodrigue, Julie Daley, L. Ravensbergen, Kevin Manaugh, Rania Wasfi, Gregory P Butler, A. El-geneidy","doi":"10.5198/jtlu.2022.2234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subjective walkability is a measure of the perceived friendliness of walking in an area. Though subjective walkability is less commonly assessed than objective measurements, the latter often fail to reflect the experience of walking. This study aims to better understand subjective walkability and how it varies between travel and leisure walking by investigating its relationship with the built environment and land-use characteristics. Data is collected from 848 street segments in Montreal, Canada, using the MAPS-mini audit tool, external measurements including Walkscore as well as synthetic subjective walkability scores. Mixed effect multilevel models are then generated using travel and leisure subjective walkability scores as dependent variables and built environment features as independent variables. Statistically significant positive predictors of perceived walkability differ between walking for travel and walking for leisure. Walkscore is found to have a weak but significant effect on perceived walkability for travel but no effect at all for leisure. Based on this research, a multi-scalar approach both at the street and neighborhood level making use of a combination of objective and subjective walkability measures should be employed to study predictors of walking behavior. Lastly, distinctions of walking behaviors based on trip purpose should be integrated in future research.","PeriodicalId":47271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport and Land Use","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport and Land Use","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2022.2234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Subjective walkability is a measure of the perceived friendliness of walking in an area. Though subjective walkability is less commonly assessed than objective measurements, the latter often fail to reflect the experience of walking. This study aims to better understand subjective walkability and how it varies between travel and leisure walking by investigating its relationship with the built environment and land-use characteristics. Data is collected from 848 street segments in Montreal, Canada, using the MAPS-mini audit tool, external measurements including Walkscore as well as synthetic subjective walkability scores. Mixed effect multilevel models are then generated using travel and leisure subjective walkability scores as dependent variables and built environment features as independent variables. Statistically significant positive predictors of perceived walkability differ between walking for travel and walking for leisure. Walkscore is found to have a weak but significant effect on perceived walkability for travel but no effect at all for leisure. Based on this research, a multi-scalar approach both at the street and neighborhood level making use of a combination of objective and subjective walkability measures should be employed to study predictors of walking behavior. Lastly, distinctions of walking behaviors based on trip purpose should be integrated in future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响主观步行性的因素:来自建筑环境审计数据的结果
主观可步行性是衡量在一个地区行走时感觉到的友好程度。尽管主观步行能力的评估不如客观测量,但客观测量往往无法反映步行体验。本研究旨在通过调查主观步行能力与建筑环境和土地利用特征的关系,更好地了解主观步行能力以及主观步行能力在旅行和休闲步行之间的变化。使用MAPS小型审计工具、包括步行得分在内的外部测量以及综合主观步行能力得分,从加拿大蒙特利尔的848个街道路段收集数据。然后,使用旅行和休闲主观可步行性得分作为因变量,并将建筑环境特征作为自变量,生成混合效应多级模型。旅行步行和休闲步行对感知步行能力的统计显著正预测因素不同。Walkscore被发现对旅行的可步行性有微弱但显著的影响,但对休闲完全没有影响。基于这项研究,应该在街道和社区层面采用多标量方法,结合客观和主观的步行能力测量来研究步行行为的预测因素。最后,基于旅行目的的步行行为差异应纳入未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Transport and Land Usepublishes original interdisciplinary papers on the interaction of transport and land use. Domains include: engineering, planning, modeling, behavior, economics, geography, regional science, sociology, architecture and design, network science, and complex systems. Papers reporting innovative methodologies, original data, and new empirical findings are especially encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Access-based land value appreciation for assessing project benefits Revealing social dimensions of urban mobility with big data: A timely dialogue Exploring practices for facilitating integrated strategic land use and transport planning in the Nordic countries Does rail transit access affect firm dynamics? Analysis of firm births and closures in Maryland, USA Incorporating diminishing returns to opportunities in access: Development of an open-source walkability index based on multi-activity accessibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1