Relativistic probability densities for location

IF 1.1 Q3 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Physics Communications Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI:10.1088/2399-6528/acddcc
Joshua G. Fenwick, R. Dick
{"title":"Relativistic probability densities for location","authors":"Joshua G. Fenwick, R. Dick","doi":"10.1088/2399-6528/acddcc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Imposing the Born rule as a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics would require the existence of normalizable wave functions ψ( x , t) also for relativistic particles. Indeed, the Fourier transforms of normalized k -space amplitudes ψ(k,t)=ψ(k)exp(−iωkt) yield normalized functions ψ( x , t) which reproduce the standard k -space expectation values for energy and momentum from local momentum (pseudo-)densities ℘ μ ( x , t) = (ℏ/2i)[ψ +( x , t)∂ μ ψ( x , t) − ∂ μ ψ +( x , t) · ψ( x , t)]. However, in the case of bosonic fields, the wave packets ψ( x , t) are nonlocally related to the corresponding relativistic quantum fields ϕ( x , t), and therefore the canonical local energy-momentum densities (x,t)=c0(x,t) and (x,t) differ from ℘ μ ( x , t) and appear nonlocal in terms of the wave packets ψ( x , t). We examine the relation between the canonical energy density (x,t) , the canonical charge density ϱ( x , t), the energy pseudo-density ˜(x,t)=c℘0(x,t) , and the Born density ∣ψ( x , t)∣2 for the massless free Klein–Gordon field. We find that those four proxies for particle location are tantalizingly close even in this extremely relativistic case: in spite of their nonlocal mathematical relations, they are mutually local in the sense that their maxima do not deviate beyond a common position uncertainty Δx. Indeed, they are practically indistinguishable in cases where we would expect a normalized quantum state to produce particle-like position signals, viz. if we are observing quanta with momenta p ≫ Δp ≥ ℏ/2Δx. We also translate our results to massless Dirac fields. Our results confirm and illustrate that the normalized energy density (x,t)/E provides a suitable measure for positions of bosons, whereas normalized charge density ϱ( x , t)/q provides a suitable measure for fermions.","PeriodicalId":47089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physics Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physics Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-6528/acddcc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Imposing the Born rule as a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics would require the existence of normalizable wave functions ψ( x , t) also for relativistic particles. Indeed, the Fourier transforms of normalized k -space amplitudes ψ(k,t)=ψ(k)exp(−iωkt) yield normalized functions ψ( x , t) which reproduce the standard k -space expectation values for energy and momentum from local momentum (pseudo-)densities ℘ μ ( x , t) = (ℏ/2i)[ψ +( x , t)∂ μ ψ( x , t) − ∂ μ ψ +( x , t) · ψ( x , t)]. However, in the case of bosonic fields, the wave packets ψ( x , t) are nonlocally related to the corresponding relativistic quantum fields ϕ( x , t), and therefore the canonical local energy-momentum densities (x,t)=c0(x,t) and (x,t) differ from ℘ μ ( x , t) and appear nonlocal in terms of the wave packets ψ( x , t). We examine the relation between the canonical energy density (x,t) , the canonical charge density ϱ( x , t), the energy pseudo-density ˜(x,t)=c℘0(x,t) , and the Born density ∣ψ( x , t)∣2 for the massless free Klein–Gordon field. We find that those four proxies for particle location are tantalizingly close even in this extremely relativistic case: in spite of their nonlocal mathematical relations, they are mutually local in the sense that their maxima do not deviate beyond a common position uncertainty Δx. Indeed, they are practically indistinguishable in cases where we would expect a normalized quantum state to produce particle-like position signals, viz. if we are observing quanta with momenta p ≫ Δp ≥ ℏ/2Δx. We also translate our results to massless Dirac fields. Our results confirm and illustrate that the normalized energy density (x,t)/E provides a suitable measure for positions of bosons, whereas normalized charge density ϱ( x , t)/q provides a suitable measure for fermions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
位置的相对论概率密度
将玻恩规则作为量子力学的基本原理,需要相对论粒子也存在可归一化波函数ψ(x,t)。事实上,归一化k空间振幅ψ(k,t)=ψ(k)exp(−iωkt)的傅立叶变换产生归一化函数ψ(x,t),该函数再现了来自局部动量(伪)密度的能量和动量的标准k空间期望值℘ μ(x,t)=(ℏ/2i)[ψ+(x,t。然而,在玻色子场的情况下,波包ψ(x,t(x,t)=c0(x,t)和(x,t)不同于℘ μ(x,t),并且根据波包ψ(x,t)表现为非局部的。我们检验了正则能量密度之间的关系(x,t),规范电荷密度ϱ(x,t),能量伪密度~(x,t)=c℘0(x,t),以及无质量自由Klein-Gordon场的Born密度Şψ。我们发现,即使在这种极端相对论的情况下,粒子位置的这四个指标也非常接近:尽管它们之间存在非局部数学关系,但它们是相互局部的,因为它们的最大值不会偏离共同的位置不确定性Δx。事实上,在我们期望归一化量子态产生类似粒子的位置信号的情况下,它们实际上是不可区分的,即,如果我们观察到动量ṕΔp≥ℏ/2Δx。我们还将结果转化为无质量狄拉克场。我们的结果证实并说明了归一化能量密度(x,t)/E为玻色子的位置提供了一个合适的度量,而归一化电荷密度ϱ(x,t)/q为费米子提供了一种合适的度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physics Communications
Journal of Physics Communications PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Deriving measurement collapse using zeta function regularisation and speculative measurement theory Zinc oxide behavior in CO detection as a function of thermal treatment time Teleportation of a qubit using quasi-Bell states The n-shot classical capacity of the quantum erasure channel Anisotropic effects in the nondipole relativistic photoionization of hydrogen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1