{"title":"Introduction: Special issue on curriculum design in public administration education: Challenges and perspectives","authors":"Michael A O'Neill","doi":"10.1177/01447394221103954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea for this special issue emerged out of conversations that occurred on the margins of the International Research Society for Public Management’s panels on education and training. These discussions were wide-ranging, but their common point was a shared interest in the content of public administration and public policy programmes, particularly post-graduate programmes like the Masters of Public Administration (MPA). In other words, these were discussions about curriculum. Though there are several definitions of curriculum in the literature about higher education (Dillion, 2009; Hurlimann et al., 2013; O’Neill, 2015; Petkuté, 2016; Whelahan, 2015), most agree that it consists of the organization and structuring of disciplinary knowledge to enable learning. Curriculum is also about pedagogy and how best to adapt the methods of teaching and learning to convey disciplinary knowledge. Finally, curriculum is also about enabling students to acquire skills, competencies, and behaviours that are relevant to their disciplinary practice. The element of practice is particularly important as most MPA andMPP programmes have a professional orientation toward careers in government and the public sector. At the same time, international student mobility and availability of distance learning programmes -(with or without a residential component), curriculum perceived to be innovative or job-ready is one way by which public administration programmes differentiate themselves in a competitive market for students.","PeriodicalId":44241,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Public Administration","volume":"40 1","pages":"299 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394221103954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The idea for this special issue emerged out of conversations that occurred on the margins of the International Research Society for Public Management’s panels on education and training. These discussions were wide-ranging, but their common point was a shared interest in the content of public administration and public policy programmes, particularly post-graduate programmes like the Masters of Public Administration (MPA). In other words, these were discussions about curriculum. Though there are several definitions of curriculum in the literature about higher education (Dillion, 2009; Hurlimann et al., 2013; O’Neill, 2015; Petkuté, 2016; Whelahan, 2015), most agree that it consists of the organization and structuring of disciplinary knowledge to enable learning. Curriculum is also about pedagogy and how best to adapt the methods of teaching and learning to convey disciplinary knowledge. Finally, curriculum is also about enabling students to acquire skills, competencies, and behaviours that are relevant to their disciplinary practice. The element of practice is particularly important as most MPA andMPP programmes have a professional orientation toward careers in government and the public sector. At the same time, international student mobility and availability of distance learning programmes -(with or without a residential component), curriculum perceived to be innovative or job-ready is one way by which public administration programmes differentiate themselves in a competitive market for students.
期刊介绍:
Teaching Public Administration (TPA) is a peer-reviewed journal, published three times a year, which focuses on teaching and learning in public sector management and organisations. TPA is committed to publishing papers which promote critical thinking about the practice and process of teaching and learning as well as those which examine more theoretical and conceptual models of teaching and learning. It offers an international forum for the debate of a wide range of issues relating to how skills and knowledge are transmitted and acquired within public sector/not for profit organisations. The Editors welcome papers which draw upon multi-disciplinary ways of thinking and working and, in particular, we are interested in the following themes/issues: Learning from international practice and experience; Curriculum design and development across all levels from pre-degree to post graduate including professional development; Professional and Taught Doctoral Programmes; Reflective Practice and the role of the Reflective Practitioner; Co-production and co-construction of the curriculum; Developments within the ‘Public Administration’ discipline; Reviews of literature and policy statements.