Educational Commitments in the 2016 Election to the Scottish Parliament: An Analysis of Party Manifestos

W. Humes
{"title":"Educational Commitments in the 2016 Election to the Scottish Parliament: An Analysis of Party Manifestos","authors":"W. Humes","doi":"10.1163/27730840-04901003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the 2016 manifestos of the main political parties seeking election to the Scottish Parliament, with particular reference to their educational commitments on issues of equality and inclusion. The policy context is described and related to academic accounts of the policy-making process. Use is made of discourse analysis as a method of highlighting key concepts and recurring textual motifs. After some general observations about manifestos as a sub-genre of political discourse, the proposals of five parties (SNP, Conservative, Labour, Liberal Democrat and Green) are considered in more detail. Education is located within the overall political programmes of the parties and points of tension and contradiction, both within and between manifestos, are noted. In the discussion section, reference is made to theoretical perspectives on policy narratives and to George Orwell’s critique of political language as measures against which the manifestos might be judged. Among the features that receive attention are the need for a stronger knowledge-base about the economics of education to evaluate policy proposals, ambivalence over the use of evidence to generate policies, and the omission of some controversial educational topics. The paper concludes by suggesting that the rhetorical invocation of concepts such as fairness, justice and equity is inevitably compromised by the practical constraints of the policy-making process.","PeriodicalId":82681,"journal":{"name":"Scottish educational review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish educational review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27730840-04901003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper examines the 2016 manifestos of the main political parties seeking election to the Scottish Parliament, with particular reference to their educational commitments on issues of equality and inclusion. The policy context is described and related to academic accounts of the policy-making process. Use is made of discourse analysis as a method of highlighting key concepts and recurring textual motifs. After some general observations about manifestos as a sub-genre of political discourse, the proposals of five parties (SNP, Conservative, Labour, Liberal Democrat and Green) are considered in more detail. Education is located within the overall political programmes of the parties and points of tension and contradiction, both within and between manifestos, are noted. In the discussion section, reference is made to theoretical perspectives on policy narratives and to George Orwell’s critique of political language as measures against which the manifestos might be judged. Among the features that receive attention are the need for a stronger knowledge-base about the economics of education to evaluate policy proposals, ambivalence over the use of evidence to generate policies, and the omission of some controversial educational topics. The paper concludes by suggesting that the rhetorical invocation of concepts such as fairness, justice and equity is inevitably compromised by the practical constraints of the policy-making process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2016年苏格兰议会选举中的教育承诺:政党宣言分析
本文研究了2016年寻求当选苏格兰议会议员的主要政党的宣言,特别是他们在平等和包容问题上的教育承诺。描述了政策背景,并与决策过程的学术描述有关。使用语篇分析作为一种突出关键概念和反复出现的语篇主题的方法。在对宣言作为政治话语的一个子类型进行了一些一般性观察后,对五个政党(苏格兰民族党、保守党、工党、自由民主党和绿党)的提案进行了更详细的考虑。教育位于各政党的总体政治方案中,宣言内部和宣言之间的紧张和矛盾点都被注意到。在讨论部分,提到了对政策叙事的理论观点,以及乔治·奥威尔对政治语言的批评,这些都是评判宣言的标准。受到关注的特征包括需要更强大的教育经济学知识库来评估政策提案,在使用证据制定政策方面存在矛盾,以及遗漏了一些有争议的教育主题。文章最后指出,公平、公正和公平等概念的修辞援引不可避免地会受到决策过程的实际约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pamela Burnard, Elizabeth Mackinlay, David Roussell and Tatiana Dragovic (Editors), Doing Rebellious Research In and Beyond the Academy Education In The Scottish Parliament Beyond the Pandemic – Poverty and School Education in Scotland Older Children Negotiating Relationships Between Home and School Access and Emergence: A Case Study of a Working-Class Journey into Studying Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1