A Reconstruction of the Proto-Puyuma Aspectual and Modal System

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS OCEANIC LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2018-12-12 DOI:10.1353/OL.2018.0014
S. Teng
{"title":"A Reconstruction of the Proto-Puyuma Aspectual and Modal System","authors":"S. Teng","doi":"10.1353/OL.2018.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper compares the aspectual and modal systems in two dialects of Puyuma—Nanwang and Katripul—and as a basis for the reconstruction of the protosystem. In modern Puyuma dialects, there is an asymmetry between Actor Voice (av) and Undergoer Voice (uv) in terms of the aspectual/modal value that they may be used to denote. In both dialects, av clauses show a realis vs. irrealis distinction. In Nanwang, uv clauses display the same dichotomy (realis vs. irrealis), but in Katripul the distinction is between perfective vs. imperfective. Based on these facts, I argue that Proto-Puyuma was an aspect-prominent language; that is, the major distinction in its aspectual/modal system was between perfective/imperfective.","PeriodicalId":51848,"journal":{"name":"OCEANIC LINGUISTICS","volume":"57 1","pages":"303 - 334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/OL.2018.0014","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCEANIC LINGUISTICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/OL.2018.0014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:This paper compares the aspectual and modal systems in two dialects of Puyuma—Nanwang and Katripul—and as a basis for the reconstruction of the protosystem. In modern Puyuma dialects, there is an asymmetry between Actor Voice (av) and Undergoer Voice (uv) in terms of the aspectual/modal value that they may be used to denote. In both dialects, av clauses show a realis vs. irrealis distinction. In Nanwang, uv clauses display the same dichotomy (realis vs. irrealis), but in Katripul the distinction is between perfective vs. imperfective. Based on these facts, I argue that Proto-Puyuma was an aspect-prominent language; that is, the major distinction in its aspectual/modal system was between perfective/imperfective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原始卑南体模系统的重构
摘要:本文比较了卑南两种方言(南旺语和卡特里普尔语)的体部系统和语气系统,为重构原系统提供了依据。在现代卑南方言中,演员音(av)和下层音(uv)在可用于表示的方面/语气值方面存在不对称。在这两种方言中,av从句都显示出现实与非现实的区别。在《南王》中,uv从句表现出同样的二分法(现实与非现实),但在《卡特里普尔》中,区分是完全与不完全。基于这些事实,笔者认为卑南原语是一种侧面突出的语言;也就是说,它的方面/语气系统的主要区别在于完成/不完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
OCEANIC LINGUISTICS
OCEANIC LINGUISTICS LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
44.40%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Oceanic Linguistics is the only journal devoted exclusively to the study of the indigenous languages of the Oceanic area and parts of Southeast Asia. The thousand-odd languages within the scope of the journal are the aboriginal languages of Australia, the Papuan languages of New Guinea, and the languages of the Austronesian (or Malayo-Polynesian) family. Articles in Oceanic Linguistics cover issues of linguistic theory that pertain to languages of the area, report research on historical relations, or furnish new information about inadequately described languages.
期刊最新文献
Middle, Reflexive, and Reciprocal Constructions in Nalögo: A Typological and Diachronic Account Observations on Tagalog Genitive Inversion When Sound Change Obscures Morphosyntax: Insights from Seediq Variation and Change in Jakarta Indonesian: Evidence from Final Glottals Repair and Drift in Austronesian Languages: Avoidance of Dissimilar Labials as the Onsets of Successive Syllables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1