The effect of the use of the Gail model on breast cancer diagnosis in BIRADs 4a cases.

E. Karakaya, Murathan Erkent, Hale Turnaoğlu, Tuğçe Şirinoğlu, A. Akdur, Lara Kavasoğlu
{"title":"The effect of the use of the Gail model on breast cancer diagnosis in BIRADs 4a cases.","authors":"E. Karakaya, Murathan Erkent, Hale Turnaoğlu, Tuğçe Şirinoğlu, A. Akdur, Lara Kavasoğlu","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2021.5436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives\nThe BI-RADS classification system and the Gail Model are the scoring systems that contribute to the diagnosis of breast cancer. The aim of the study was to determine the contribution of Gail Model to the diagnosis of breast lesions that were radiologically categorized as BI-RADS 4A.\n\n\nMaterial and Methods\nWe retrospectively examined the medical records of 320 patients between January 2011 and December 2020 whose lesions had been categorized as BI-RADS 4A. Radiological parameters of breast lesions and clinical parameters according to the Gail Model were collected. The relationship between malignant BI-RADS 4A lesions and radiological and clinical parameters was evaluated. In addition, the effect of the Gail Model on diagnosis in malignant BI-RADS 4A lesions was evaluated.\n\n\nResults\nAmong radiological features, there were significant differences between lesion size, contour, microcalcification content, echogenicity, and presence of ectasia with respect to the pathological diagnosis (p <0.05). No significant difference was found between the lesions' pathological diagnosis and the patients' Gail score (p> 0.05). An analysis of the features of the Gail model revealed that there was no significant difference between the age of menarche, age at first live birth, presence of a first-degree relative with breast cancer, and a history of breast biopsy and the pathological diagnosis (p> 0.05).\n\n\nConclusion\nAs a conclusion Gail Model does not contribute to the diagnosis of BC, especially in patients with BI-RADS 4A lesions.","PeriodicalId":90992,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","volume":"37 4 1","pages":"394-399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2021.5436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives The BI-RADS classification system and the Gail Model are the scoring systems that contribute to the diagnosis of breast cancer. The aim of the study was to determine the contribution of Gail Model to the diagnosis of breast lesions that were radiologically categorized as BI-RADS 4A. Material and Methods We retrospectively examined the medical records of 320 patients between January 2011 and December 2020 whose lesions had been categorized as BI-RADS 4A. Radiological parameters of breast lesions and clinical parameters according to the Gail Model were collected. The relationship between malignant BI-RADS 4A lesions and radiological and clinical parameters was evaluated. In addition, the effect of the Gail Model on diagnosis in malignant BI-RADS 4A lesions was evaluated. Results Among radiological features, there were significant differences between lesion size, contour, microcalcification content, echogenicity, and presence of ectasia with respect to the pathological diagnosis (p <0.05). No significant difference was found between the lesions' pathological diagnosis and the patients' Gail score (p> 0.05). An analysis of the features of the Gail model revealed that there was no significant difference between the age of menarche, age at first live birth, presence of a first-degree relative with breast cancer, and a history of breast biopsy and the pathological diagnosis (p> 0.05). Conclusion As a conclusion Gail Model does not contribute to the diagnosis of BC, especially in patients with BI-RADS 4A lesions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gail模型对BIRADs 4a病例乳腺癌诊断的影响。
目的BI-RADS分类系统和Gail模型是有助于诊断癌症的评分系统。本研究的目的是确定Gail模型对乳腺病变诊断的贡献,这些病变在放射学上被归类为BI-RADS 4A。材料和方法我们回顾性检查了2011年1月至2020年12月期间320名患者的医疗记录,这些患者的病变被归类为BI-RADS 4A。根据Gail模型收集乳腺病变的放射学参数和临床参数。评估恶性BI-RADS 4A病变与放射学和临床参数之间的关系。此外,还评估了Gail模型在恶性BI-RADS 4A病变诊断中的作用。结果在放射学特征中,病变大小、轮廓、微钙化含量、回声和扩张的存在与病理诊断之间存在显著差异(p0.05)。对Gail模型特征的分析显示,初潮年龄、首次活产年龄、,结论Gail模型对乳腺癌的诊断没有贡献,尤其是对BI-RADS 4A病变的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Circulating tumor DNA for monitoring colorectal cancer: A prospective observational study to assess the presence of methylated SEPT9 and VIM promoter genes and its role as a biomarker in colorectal cancer management. Synchronous pancreas and gallbladder cancer with concomitant alopecia totalis. The effects of the use of hyoscine-N-butylbromide during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A retrospective study of diagnosis and management of gallbladder perforation: 10-year experience from a tertiary health care centre. Surgery versus no surgery in stage IV gallbladder carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1