Change in research and in higher education institutions

IF 0.5 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES Investigaciones Feministas Pub Date : 2021-06-18 DOI:10.5209/infe.72054
S. Diogo, C. Jordão, Teresa Carvalho, Hana Himi, Maya Ashkenazi, Veronika Mešková, A. Thaler, Jennifer Dahmen-Adkins
{"title":"Change in research and in higher education institutions","authors":"S. Diogo, C. Jordão, Teresa Carvalho, Hana Himi, Maya Ashkenazi, Veronika Mešková, A. Thaler, Jennifer Dahmen-Adkins","doi":"10.5209/infe.72054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Funded under the Horizon 2020 programme, the CHANGE project –Challenging Gender (In)Equality in Science and Research– aims to create and implement tailor-made gender equality plans (GEPs) in research performing organisations (RPOs). To make GEPs more sustainable, efforts are being made to stimulate institutional cultural change towards gender equal work environments and foster the gender dimension and inclusive research and innovation programmes in research funding organisations (RFOs) as well. The promotion of a gender equality culture is thus a key requirement for RPOs to maximise their potential. The CHANGE consortium is composed of seven institutions from six countries –Austria, Germany, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, and Israel– of which five are GEP implementing partners and two are experienced partners (one coordinator and one internal evaluator). Objectives and Methodology. This paper approaches the methodology of the project and the structural and cultural challenges faced by the implementing partners so far, looking more specifically to the similarities and differences in the different national and institutional contexts. Results and Discussion. In all the five implementing partners organisations, successful steps have been taken in the implementation of GEPs. Regardless of these first successes, even with increasing women’s representation in management and decision-making positions in some specific cases, implementing partners and coordinators fear that this change may be merely circumstantial or only due and during the project duration. Contribution. The challenges and barriers faced so far to stimulate institutional and cultural change towards gender equal work environments in RPOs are diverse. While there are important social, cultural, and institutional differences among the partner institutions, there is a great similarity in the difficulties faced in implementing GEPs. Resistances and challenges that emerge during processes of change when gender equality policies are implemented in RPOs are more transversal to different national and organisational contexts than one could expect.","PeriodicalId":43469,"journal":{"name":"Investigaciones Feministas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigaciones Feministas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.72054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction. Funded under the Horizon 2020 programme, the CHANGE project –Challenging Gender (In)Equality in Science and Research– aims to create and implement tailor-made gender equality plans (GEPs) in research performing organisations (RPOs). To make GEPs more sustainable, efforts are being made to stimulate institutional cultural change towards gender equal work environments and foster the gender dimension and inclusive research and innovation programmes in research funding organisations (RFOs) as well. The promotion of a gender equality culture is thus a key requirement for RPOs to maximise their potential. The CHANGE consortium is composed of seven institutions from six countries –Austria, Germany, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, and Israel– of which five are GEP implementing partners and two are experienced partners (one coordinator and one internal evaluator). Objectives and Methodology. This paper approaches the methodology of the project and the structural and cultural challenges faced by the implementing partners so far, looking more specifically to the similarities and differences in the different national and institutional contexts. Results and Discussion. In all the five implementing partners organisations, successful steps have been taken in the implementation of GEPs. Regardless of these first successes, even with increasing women’s representation in management and decision-making positions in some specific cases, implementing partners and coordinators fear that this change may be merely circumstantial or only due and during the project duration. Contribution. The challenges and barriers faced so far to stimulate institutional and cultural change towards gender equal work environments in RPOs are diverse. While there are important social, cultural, and institutional differences among the partner institutions, there is a great similarity in the difficulties faced in implementing GEPs. Resistances and challenges that emerge during processes of change when gender equality policies are implemented in RPOs are more transversal to different national and organisational contexts than one could expect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究和高等教育机构的变化
介绍。在“地平线2020”项目资助下,CHANGE项目——挑战科学和研究中的性别平等——旨在在研究执行组织(rpo)中创建和实施量身定制的性别平等计划(gep)。为了使全球性别平等方案更具可持续性,正在努力促进体制文化变革,以实现性别平等的工作环境,并在研究资助组织(rfo)中促进性别层面和包容性研究和创新方案。因此,促进性别平等文化是区域组织最大限度发挥其潜力的关键要求。CHANGE联盟由来自6个国家(奥地利、德国、葡萄牙、斯洛文尼亚、斯洛伐克和以色列)的7个机构组成,其中5个是全球环境计划的执行伙伴,2个是有经验的伙伴(一个协调员和一个内部评价员)。目标和方法。本文探讨了该项目的方法以及迄今为止执行伙伴所面临的结构和文化挑战,更具体地探讨了不同国家和体制背景下的异同。结果和讨论。在所有五个执行伙伴组织中,都已在实施全球环境行动纲领方面采取了成功步骤。尽管取得了这些初步的成功,即使在某些具体情况下妇女在管理和决策职位上的人数有所增加,但执行伙伴和协调员担心这种变化可能只是间接的,或只是在项目期间应有的变化。的贡献。到目前为止,在促进区域办事处向性别平等的工作环境进行体制和文化变革方面所面临的挑战和障碍是多种多样的。虽然伙伴机构之间存在着重要的社会、文化和体制差异,但在执行全球环境行动纲领时所面临的困难非常相似。在农村地区实施性别平等政策时,在变革过程中出现的阻力和挑战比人们预期的更具有跨国界性,涉及不同的国家和组织背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investigaciones Feministas
Investigaciones Feministas WOMENS STUDIES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Zoe Zenghelis y la representación gráfica del proyecto turístico Desafíos para las científicas en contexto de vulnerabilidad: corresponsabilidad y productividad académica La imagen de la mujer en la Trilogía Roja de Zhang Yimou: silencio y resistencia en las estructuras patriarcales chinas Desigualdad de género en el mercado laboral en España en tiempos de crisis sanitaria global Sanna Marin y una nueva forma de hacer comunicación política a través de Instagram
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1