http://www.folia.ac.me/image/38/Dora%20Kelemen.pdf

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Folia Linguistica et Litteraria Pub Date : 2021-11-08 DOI:10.31902/fll.38.2021.12
D. Kelemen
{"title":"http://www.folia.ac.me/image/38/Dora%20Kelemen.pdf","authors":"D. Kelemen","doi":"10.31902/fll.38.2021.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes female characters in two early works by Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky– Poor Folk (1845, Bednye liudi) and The Double (1846, Dvoinik). It considers the literary methods used to represent those characters, as well as their relation to the male main character and some aspects of gender construction in these works. It is shown that the importance of female characters in these two works is directly connected with their (real or imagined) influence on the male main character. Consequently, a female character can play an important role in the novel even if she doesn’t personally appear in it. Women are fatal for both male characters, albeit for different reasons. Drawing on the research of Neuhäuser (1979), this article shows some further similarities in the basic structure of both works. They share the form of a love affair accompanied by intertextual references, as well as a narrated previous relationship of the male character, both of them serving as an additional explanation of the current love affair. The epistolary form of Poor Folk leads to self-representation being the main way of showing Varvara Dobroselova’s character, while Klara Olsuf’evna of The Double is depicted both from the perspective of the auctorial first-person narrator, as well as from Goliadkin’s perspective. The auctorial narrator of The Double ironizes not only Klara Olsuf’evna, but also other characters and social practices of the Petersburg society. The internal monologues and the free indirect speech of Goliadkin, however, show signs of a negative, even misogynistic attitude towards the character of Karolina Ivanovna and partially also to Klara Olsuf’evna. Lastly, Poor Folk introduces themes to Dostoevsky’s work, which occupy him until the end of his life and manifest themselves in their more recognizable form in his later works.","PeriodicalId":40358,"journal":{"name":"Folia Linguistica et Litteraria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Linguistica et Litteraria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31902/fll.38.2021.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyzes female characters in two early works by Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky– Poor Folk (1845, Bednye liudi) and The Double (1846, Dvoinik). It considers the literary methods used to represent those characters, as well as their relation to the male main character and some aspects of gender construction in these works. It is shown that the importance of female characters in these two works is directly connected with their (real or imagined) influence on the male main character. Consequently, a female character can play an important role in the novel even if she doesn’t personally appear in it. Women are fatal for both male characters, albeit for different reasons. Drawing on the research of Neuhäuser (1979), this article shows some further similarities in the basic structure of both works. They share the form of a love affair accompanied by intertextual references, as well as a narrated previous relationship of the male character, both of them serving as an additional explanation of the current love affair. The epistolary form of Poor Folk leads to self-representation being the main way of showing Varvara Dobroselova’s character, while Klara Olsuf’evna of The Double is depicted both from the perspective of the auctorial first-person narrator, as well as from Goliadkin’s perspective. The auctorial narrator of The Double ironizes not only Klara Olsuf’evna, but also other characters and social practices of the Petersburg society. The internal monologues and the free indirect speech of Goliadkin, however, show signs of a negative, even misogynistic attitude towards the character of Karolina Ivanovna and partially also to Klara Olsuf’evna. Lastly, Poor Folk introduces themes to Dostoevsky’s work, which occupy him until the end of his life and manifest themselves in their more recognizable form in his later works.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
http://www.folia.ac.me/image/38/Dora%20Kelemen.pdf
本文分析了陀思妥耶夫斯基早期两部作品——《穷人》(1845,贝德涅·柳迪)和《双生》(1846,德沃尼克)中的女性角色。研究了这些人物的文学表现手法,以及他们与男性主角的关系,以及这些作品中性别建构的一些方面。研究表明,这两部作品中女性角色的重要性与她们(真实的或想象的)对男性主角的影响直接相关。因此,即使一个女性角色没有亲自出现在小说中,她也可以在小说中扮演重要的角色。女性对两个男性角色来说都是致命的,尽管原因不同。本文借鉴Neuhäuser(1979)的研究,进一步揭示了两部作品在基本结构上的相似之处。它们都有一段爱情的形式,伴随着互文的引用,以及男性角色之前的一段关系的叙述,这两者都是对当前爱情的额外解释。《穷人》的书信形式导致自我再现成为瓦尔瓦拉·多布罗塞洛娃性格的主要表现方式,而《双生》中的克拉拉·奥尔苏夫耶夫娜既有作者第一人称叙述者的视角,也有戈利亚金的视角。《双重》的作者叙述者不仅讽刺了克拉拉·奥尔苏夫耶夫娜,还讽刺了彼得堡社会的其他人物和社会习俗。然而,Goliadkin的内心独白和自由的间接言语,显示出对Karolina Ivanovna这个角色的消极,甚至是厌恶女性的态度,部分也对Klara Olsuf 'evna。最后,《穷人》为陀思妥耶夫斯基的作品引入了主题,这些主题一直占据着陀思妥耶夫斯基,直到他生命的尽头,并在他后来的作品中以更容易辨认的形式表现出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Folia Linguistica et Litteraria
Folia Linguistica et Litteraria HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
HIGHER EDUCATION DISCOURSE: CHANGES IN THE USE OF VERBAL AND VISUAL DEVICES IN CROATIAN UNIVERSITY SELF-PRESENTATION SHADES OF A WOMAN’S TIME: THE CHRONOTOPIC REVISION OF HISTORY IN SELECTED POEMS OF EAVAN BOLAND’S OUTSIDE HISTORY NIETZSCHE’S AMOR FATI IN DAVID FOSTER WALLACE’S INFINITE JEST SOME LINGUISTIC AND STYLISTIC PROPERTIES OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE FROM THE TREASURES OF ANCIENT ITALIAN: CONJUNCTIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1