Russia, the Western Balkans, and the Question of Status

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES East European Politics and Societies Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI:10.1177/08883254221130366
Janko Šćepanović
{"title":"Russia, the Western Balkans, and the Question of Status","authors":"Janko Šćepanović","doi":"10.1177/08883254221130366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reassesses Russia’s policy vis-à-vis the Western Balkans in terms of its pursuit of status. The region has been historically significant to Russia. It saw centuries of interaction between rulers in Moscow (or St. Petersburg) with the local Orthodox Slavs and other great powers of the day. Following the end of the Cold War, the Russian state emerged as a very different entity from imperial Russia or the Soviet Union. In the Western Balkans, it found a stage for not just rekindling centuries-long ties but also rebuilding its image as a great power in cooperation and, as this paper shows, increasing competition with primarily the West. However, as this research attests by referring to the Larson–Shevchenko framework of the Social Identity Theory (SIT), status must be conferred through a voluntary recognition by other great powers, which recognize status-aspirant’s actions as non-threatening to their standing and as having a positive value. So far, Russia’s Balkan policies have primarily been seen negatively as either promoting retrograde ideology or outright spoiler behavior.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"37 1","pages":"1059 - 1083"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics and Societies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254221130366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper reassesses Russia’s policy vis-à-vis the Western Balkans in terms of its pursuit of status. The region has been historically significant to Russia. It saw centuries of interaction between rulers in Moscow (or St. Petersburg) with the local Orthodox Slavs and other great powers of the day. Following the end of the Cold War, the Russian state emerged as a very different entity from imperial Russia or the Soviet Union. In the Western Balkans, it found a stage for not just rekindling centuries-long ties but also rebuilding its image as a great power in cooperation and, as this paper shows, increasing competition with primarily the West. However, as this research attests by referring to the Larson–Shevchenko framework of the Social Identity Theory (SIT), status must be conferred through a voluntary recognition by other great powers, which recognize status-aspirant’s actions as non-threatening to their standing and as having a positive value. So far, Russia’s Balkan policies have primarily been seen negatively as either promoting retrograde ideology or outright spoiler behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄国、西巴尔干和地位问题
本文从追求地位的角度重新评估了俄罗斯对-à-vis西巴尔干半岛的政策。该地区在历史上对俄罗斯意义重大。它见证了莫斯科(或圣彼得堡)的统治者与当地东正教斯拉夫人和当时其他大国之间几个世纪的互动。冷战结束后,俄罗斯成为一个与俄罗斯帝国或苏联截然不同的实体。在西巴尔干半岛,它找到了一个舞台,不仅可以重新点燃长达几个世纪的关系,还可以重建其作为一个合作大国的形象,正如本文所示,主要是与西方竞争。然而,正如本研究通过参考社会认同理论(SIT)的拉尔森-舍甫琴科框架所证明的那样,地位必须通过其他大国的自愿承认来授予,这些大国承认地位上进者的行为不会威胁到他们的地位,并且具有积极的价值。到目前为止,俄罗斯的巴尔干政策主要被认为是负面的,要么是提倡倒退的意识形态,要么是彻头彻尾的破坏者行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: East European Politics and Societies is an international journal that examines social, political, and economic issues in Eastern Europe. EEPS offers holistic coverage of the region - every country, from every discipline - ranging from detailed case studies through comparative analyses and theoretical issues. Contributors include not only western scholars but many from Eastern Europe itself. The Editorial Board is composed of a world-class panel of historians, political scientists, economists, and social scientists.
期刊最新文献
Expelled from the Fairytale: The Impact of the Dissident Legacy on Post-1989 Central European Politics Post-Dissident Politics and the “Liberal Consensus” in East-Central Europe after 1989 Václav Havel Posthumous Reclamation of a National Hero? An Arrested Dialectic: The National Past and (Post-)Dissident Catholic Moral Reasoning in Slovakia From Dissidence to Heroism: Constructing an Ideal Post-Communist Identity in the Czech Republic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1