Is There an Increased Risk of Intra-Abdominal Abscesses After Laparoscopic Appendectomy? Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: A Single-Institution Experience

Q4 Medicine Jordan Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-05 DOI:10.35516/jmj.v57i1.1100
Mays Ziad Almuhaisen, A. Orhan, Ayoub Rm, Alsunna Raad Hassan, Qudah, Faisal, Elmuhtaseb Ms
{"title":"Is There an Increased Risk of Intra-Abdominal Abscesses After Laparoscopic Appendectomy? Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: A Single-Institution Experience","authors":"Mays Ziad Almuhaisen, A. Orhan, Ayoub Rm, Alsunna Raad Hassan, Qudah, Faisal, Elmuhtaseb Ms","doi":"10.35516/jmj.v57i1.1100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen. Currently, larger numbers of appendectomies are being performed laparoscopically. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic appendectomies to open surgery in terms of intra- and post-operative complications, including the risk of intra-abdominal abscess formation, operative time, time of initiating oral diet, and the length of hospital stay in our institution. \nMethods: The study group of 283 patients having undergone appendectomies between January 2013 and Jan 2016 was divided into two subgroups as ‘open’ and ‘laparoscopic’. The data regarding the surgical outcomes of these groups were evaluated retrospectively and statistically analyzed. \nResults: In terms of postoperative complications, intra-abdominal abscesses were found to be higher in the laparoscopic group (p=.045). On the other hand, surgical site infection (SSI) rates were found to be higher in the open group (but did not reach statistical significance). Operative time was affected by the surgeon’s expertise and was found to be shorter in the laparoscopic group (p<0.05). The time of initiating oral diet was sooner in the laparoscopic group compared to the open group (p=0.043), and the overall length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (p=0.0001). \nConclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with early return to a normal diet, fewer wound complications, and a shorter hospital stay, but also with a slightly higher rate of intra-abdominal abscesses. Notably, it is now the standard method of acute appendicitis management in some centers.","PeriodicalId":39681,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v57i1.1100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen. Currently, larger numbers of appendectomies are being performed laparoscopically. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic appendectomies to open surgery in terms of intra- and post-operative complications, including the risk of intra-abdominal abscess formation, operative time, time of initiating oral diet, and the length of hospital stay in our institution. Methods: The study group of 283 patients having undergone appendectomies between January 2013 and Jan 2016 was divided into two subgroups as ‘open’ and ‘laparoscopic’. The data regarding the surgical outcomes of these groups were evaluated retrospectively and statistically analyzed. Results: In terms of postoperative complications, intra-abdominal abscesses were found to be higher in the laparoscopic group (p=.045). On the other hand, surgical site infection (SSI) rates were found to be higher in the open group (but did not reach statistical significance). Operative time was affected by the surgeon’s expertise and was found to be shorter in the laparoscopic group (p<0.05). The time of initiating oral diet was sooner in the laparoscopic group compared to the open group (p=0.043), and the overall length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (p=0.0001). Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with early return to a normal diet, fewer wound complications, and a shorter hospital stay, but also with a slightly higher rate of intra-abdominal abscesses. Notably, it is now the standard method of acute appendicitis management in some centers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔脓肿的风险增加吗?腹腔镜与开放性阑尾切除术:单一机构的经验
背景:急性阑尾炎是急腹症最常见的病因。目前,越来越多的阑尾切除术是通过腹腔镜进行的。本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开放手术的术中和术后并发症,包括腹腔脓肿形成的风险、手术时间、开始口服饮食的时间以及在我们机构的住院时间。方法:研究组包括283名在2013年1月至2016年1月期间接受阑尾切除术的患者,分为“开放”和“腹腔镜”两个亚组。对这些组的手术结果进行了回顾性评估和统计分析。结果:在术后并发症方面,腹腔镜组的腹腔内脓肿更高(p=.045)。另一方面,开放组的手术部位感染(SSI)率更高(但没有达到统计学意义)。手术时间受外科医生专业知识的影响,腹腔镜组的手术时间更短(p<0.05)。与开放组相比,腹腔镜组开始口服饮食的时间更短(p=0.043),结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术可早期恢复正常饮食,减少伤口并发症,缩短住院时间,但腹腔脓肿发生率略高。值得注意的是,它现在是一些中心治疗急性阑尾炎的标准方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jordan Medical Journal
Jordan Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Hirschsprung Disease in Jordan: A Review and Status Update Poison Centers in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: History, Scope of Services, and Strengths and Weaknesses as Public Healthcare Providers Mediastinal Bronchogenic Cysts: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment Outcomes Safety and Efficacy of Bone Marrow and Adipose Tissue Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury: A Preliminary Study Irisin’s Mechanism of Action and Levels in Physiological and Pathological Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1