Mass casualty event scenarios and political shifts: 2020 election outcomes and the U.S. COVID-19 pandemic

Q1 Social Sciences Administrative Theory and Praxis Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/10841806.2020.1752978
A. Johnson, Wendi Pollock, Beth M. Rauhaus
{"title":"Mass casualty event scenarios and political shifts: 2020 election outcomes and the U.S. COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"A. Johnson, Wendi Pollock, Beth M. Rauhaus","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2020.1752978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract COVID-19 models indicate a mass casualty event may potentially occur in the United States. Among numerous social and economic changes, the potential to reshape the political landscape exists. The theoretical perspective of politics-administration dichotomy is used to examine the rhetoric, power, and authority of public health messages during the pandemic. This study considers political shifts using state-level data on population, historical voter turnout, and projected COVID-19 cases number coupled with national-level data on voter participation by age group and COVID-19 fatality rates. Developing a formula to calculate these data, we project the extent to which the number of voters from each party could diminish. The analysis shows the potential for significant political changes due to the disproportionate loss of older voters in key swing states in the months leading to the 2020 presidential election.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"42 1","pages":"249 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10841806.2020.1752978","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1752978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Abstract COVID-19 models indicate a mass casualty event may potentially occur in the United States. Among numerous social and economic changes, the potential to reshape the political landscape exists. The theoretical perspective of politics-administration dichotomy is used to examine the rhetoric, power, and authority of public health messages during the pandemic. This study considers political shifts using state-level data on population, historical voter turnout, and projected COVID-19 cases number coupled with national-level data on voter participation by age group and COVID-19 fatality rates. Developing a formula to calculate these data, we project the extent to which the number of voters from each party could diminish. The analysis shows the potential for significant political changes due to the disproportionate loss of older voters in key swing states in the months leading to the 2020 presidential election.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大规模伤亡事件情景和政治转变:2020年大选结果和美国COVID-19大流行
摘要新冠肺炎模型表明,美国可能发生大规模伤亡事件。在众多的社会和经济变革中,存在着重塑政治格局的潜力。政治-行政二分法的理论视角被用来考察疫情期间公共卫生信息的修辞、权力和权威。这项研究利用国家一级的人口数据、历史选民投票率和预计的新冠肺炎病例数,以及按年龄组和新冠肺炎死亡率划分的选民参与率数据,考虑政治变化。通过开发一个计算这些数据的公式,我们预测了每个政党的选民人数可能减少的程度。分析显示,在2020年总统大选前的几个月里,由于关键摇摆州的老年选民流失过多,可能会发生重大政治变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Administrative Theory and Praxis
Administrative Theory and Praxis Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Farewell, and thanks for the memories Reckoning with theoretical research: A heuristic for gauging and writing public administration theory Meaningful knowledge about public administration: Epistemological and methodological antecedents Theory and practice in dis-harmony? Toward a praxis ecosystem approach to the public administration and management discipline and profession ATP celebrates 45 years: A dialogue series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1