Understanding gender intersectionality for more robust ocean science

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2022.100148
Mark Axelrod , Meghan Vona , Julia Novak Colwell , Kafayat Fakoya , Shyam S. Salim , D.G. Webster , Maricela de la Torre-Castro
{"title":"Understanding gender intersectionality for more robust ocean science","authors":"Mark Axelrod ,&nbsp;Meghan Vona ,&nbsp;Julia Novak Colwell ,&nbsp;Kafayat Fakoya ,&nbsp;Shyam S. Salim ,&nbsp;D.G. Webster ,&nbsp;Maricela de la Torre-Castro","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2022.100148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The UN Decade of Ocean Science (UNDOS) aims to: “Generate knowledge, support innovation, and develop solutions for equitable and sustainable development of the ocean economy under changing environmental, social and climate conditions.” Changing conditions affect certain groups more than others, depending on exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Gendered differentiation has been studied in small scale coastal fisheries. However, this approach is often limited to male-female gender dichotomies. In contrast, the present analysis takes a more expansive approach centered around the concept of intersectionality, to demonstrate more nuanced differences in terms of individuals’ access to resources for adaptation. We build on multiple Earth System Governance contextual conditions and research lenses to demonstrate that an intersectional approach allows greater understanding of gendered adaptation options impacted by various other factors. This must include investigations beyond the traditional gender binary, which we have sought to achieve in this study by using broader local and individualistic context to observe different communities. We compare gender intersectionality in case studies from India and Tanzania. The evidence demonstrates that intersectional factors vary, impacting adaptiveness to changing Anthropocene conditions, depending upon cross-cutting context-specific systems of hierarchy and discrimination. However, despite variation, we demonstrate there are common factors to be investigated across all locations when identifying possible intersectional impacts of ocean policy interventions, particularly wealth, marriage and family roles, and social networks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100148"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000179/pdfft?md5=5ca2b60c09ada5ea5faafca4cff529db&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811622000179-main.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811622000179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The UN Decade of Ocean Science (UNDOS) aims to: “Generate knowledge, support innovation, and develop solutions for equitable and sustainable development of the ocean economy under changing environmental, social and climate conditions.” Changing conditions affect certain groups more than others, depending on exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Gendered differentiation has been studied in small scale coastal fisheries. However, this approach is often limited to male-female gender dichotomies. In contrast, the present analysis takes a more expansive approach centered around the concept of intersectionality, to demonstrate more nuanced differences in terms of individuals’ access to resources for adaptation. We build on multiple Earth System Governance contextual conditions and research lenses to demonstrate that an intersectional approach allows greater understanding of gendered adaptation options impacted by various other factors. This must include investigations beyond the traditional gender binary, which we have sought to achieve in this study by using broader local and individualistic context to observe different communities. We compare gender intersectionality in case studies from India and Tanzania. The evidence demonstrates that intersectional factors vary, impacting adaptiveness to changing Anthropocene conditions, depending upon cross-cutting context-specific systems of hierarchy and discrimination. However, despite variation, we demonstrate there are common factors to be investigated across all locations when identifying possible intersectional impacts of ocean policy interventions, particularly wealth, marriage and family roles, and social networks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解性别的交叉性有助于更强大的海洋科学
联合国海洋科学十年的目标是:“在不断变化的环境、社会和气候条件下,创造知识,支持创新,并为海洋经济的公平和可持续发展制定解决方案。”变化的环境对某些群体的影响比其他群体更大,这取决于接触、敏感度和适应能力。在小规模沿海渔业中研究了性别分化。然而,这种方法往往局限于男女性别二分法。相比之下,本研究采用了一种更广泛的方法,以交叉性的概念为中心,展示了个体在获取适应资源方面的更细微的差异。我们以多种地球系统治理背景条件和研究视角为基础,证明交叉方法可以更好地理解受各种其他因素影响的性别适应选择。这必须包括超越传统性别二元的调查,我们在本研究中试图通过使用更广泛的地方和个人主义背景来观察不同的社区来实现这一目标。我们在印度和坦桑尼亚的案例研究中比较了性别交叉性。证据表明,交叉因素的变化会影响对不断变化的人类世条件的适应性,这取决于跨领域的特定背景的等级和歧视系统。然而,尽管存在差异,我们证明,在确定海洋政策干预可能产生的交叉影响时,所有地点都有共同的因素需要调查,特别是财富、婚姻和家庭角色以及社会网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diversifying climate policy advice: Research agenda on the expertise of national climate councils Jurisdictional approaches to sustainable agro-commodity governance: The state of knowledge and future research directions Towards sustainable governance of freshwater sand – A resource regime approach Exploring the rights of nature in freshwater and marine ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1