Evaluation of educational program of doctor of medicine (MD - Radiology) and diploma in medical radio-diagnosis in jawaharlal nehru medical college, a constituent unit of datta meghe institute of medical sciences (Deemed to be University), Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha

Gaurav Mishra, A. Dhok, Rohankumar Singh, P. Patwa
{"title":"Evaluation of educational program of doctor of medicine (MD - Radiology) and diploma in medical radio-diagnosis in jawaharlal nehru medical college, a constituent unit of datta meghe institute of medical sciences (Deemed to be University), Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha","authors":"Gaurav Mishra, A. Dhok, Rohankumar Singh, P. Patwa","doi":"10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_294_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Evaluation is a systematic determination of a subject's merit, worth, and significance, using criteria governed by a set of standards. It can assist an organization, program, project, or any other intervention or initiative to assess any aim, reliable concept/proposal, or any alternative, to help in decision-making; or to ascertain the degree of achievement or value in regard to the aim and objectives and results of any such action that has been completed. Materials and Methods: In a sample of 30 with a break up of 19 learners and 11 faculty, a standard curriculum questionnaire (Annexure-II) for ascertaining the “Relevance, Efficiency, Effectiveness, Impact and Sustainability” vide Danish International Development Agency guidelines generated by Development Assessment Committee of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development the educational process in MD Radiodiagnosis and Diploma in Medical Radiodiagnosis (DMRD) educational program was given to the participating learners and members of the teaching staff to evaluate the “process” of the said educational programs. The participants will be divided into three groups, namely Group-1 (Neutral Opinion), Group-2 (Agreeing and Strongly Agreeing Opinion) and Group-3 (Disagreeing and Strongly Disagreeing opinion). Further, the participants will be required to rate their satisfaction level on a rating scale of 10. Results: Response evaluation of MD Radiodiagnosis group showed significantly higher level of satisfaction in terms of relevance, effectiveness, and efficiency of the curriculum. Response evaluation of DMRD group showed similar results. In comparison of both groups, the level of satisfaction with respect to MD Radiodiagnosis program quantitatively was greater as compared to DMRD program. Conclusion: The evaluation and the obtained results therein were with reference to “process” of the academic program namely MD Radiodiagnosis and DMRD respectively. The evaluation of “product” part could not be included in the study.","PeriodicalId":15592,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University","volume":"18 1","pages":"271 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_294_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluation is a systematic determination of a subject's merit, worth, and significance, using criteria governed by a set of standards. It can assist an organization, program, project, or any other intervention or initiative to assess any aim, reliable concept/proposal, or any alternative, to help in decision-making; or to ascertain the degree of achievement or value in regard to the aim and objectives and results of any such action that has been completed. Materials and Methods: In a sample of 30 with a break up of 19 learners and 11 faculty, a standard curriculum questionnaire (Annexure-II) for ascertaining the “Relevance, Efficiency, Effectiveness, Impact and Sustainability” vide Danish International Development Agency guidelines generated by Development Assessment Committee of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development the educational process in MD Radiodiagnosis and Diploma in Medical Radiodiagnosis (DMRD) educational program was given to the participating learners and members of the teaching staff to evaluate the “process” of the said educational programs. The participants will be divided into three groups, namely Group-1 (Neutral Opinion), Group-2 (Agreeing and Strongly Agreeing Opinion) and Group-3 (Disagreeing and Strongly Disagreeing opinion). Further, the participants will be required to rate their satisfaction level on a rating scale of 10. Results: Response evaluation of MD Radiodiagnosis group showed significantly higher level of satisfaction in terms of relevance, effectiveness, and efficiency of the curriculum. Response evaluation of DMRD group showed similar results. In comparison of both groups, the level of satisfaction with respect to MD Radiodiagnosis program quantitatively was greater as compared to DMRD program. Conclusion: The evaluation and the obtained results therein were with reference to “process” of the academic program namely MD Radiodiagnosis and DMRD respectively. The evaluation of “product” part could not be included in the study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对瓦尔达Sawangi (meghe)贾瓦哈拉尔尼赫鲁医学院医学博士(放射学)教育方案和医学放射诊断文凭的评估,该医学院是data meghe医学研究所(被视为大学)的组成单位
背景:评估是一种系统地确定一个科目的优点、价值和重要性,使用一套标准管理的标准。它可以帮助组织、计划、项目或任何其他干预或倡议评估任何目标、可靠的概念/提案或任何替代方案,以帮助决策;或确定已完成的任何此类行动的目标和结果的实现程度或价值。材料和方法:在30名学生(包括19名学生和11名教师)的样本中,确定“相关性、效率、有效性、影响和可持续性”的标准课程调查表(附录II),见经济合作与发展组织发展评估委员会制定的丹麦国际开发署指南医学博士放射诊断和医学放射诊断文凭(DMRD)的教育过程教育计划提供给参与的学习者和教职员工,以评估上述教育计划的“过程”。参与者将分为三组,即第一组(中立意见)、第二组(同意和强烈同意意见)和第三组(不同意和强烈反对意见)。此外,参与者将被要求在10分的评分表上对他们的满意度进行评分。结果:MD放射诊断组的反应评估显示,在课程的相关性、有效性和效率方面,满意度显著较高。DMRD组的反应评价结果相似。在两组的比较中,与DMRD计划相比,MD放射诊断计划在数量上的满意度更高。结论:本评价及评价结果分别参考了医学博士放射诊断和DMRD两个学科项目的“过程”。“产品”部分的评估不能包括在研究中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Academic to AI-cademic: Challenges and Recommendations of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Writing Manoeuvring distal tibial shaft fractures with Ender's nailing: Case series Effect of palliative care communication on knowledge and attitude among caregivers of cancer patients The effect of toothbrushing duration on plaque removal: A randomized crossover trial Amelioration of pathological tooth migration by surgical periodontal therapy alone: A stupendous clinical case report with two year follow up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1