Modeling the competition-restrictive actions in public works procurement

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Journal of Public Procurement Pub Date : 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1108/jopp-12-2022-0060
G. Bhagat, K. N. Jha
{"title":"Modeling the competition-restrictive actions in public works procurement","authors":"G. Bhagat, K. N. Jha","doi":"10.1108/jopp-12-2022-0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nWith the surge in public procurement, especially in developing countries, ensuring fair competition in procurement has assumed paramount importance. Academic endeavors in the domain of competition issues have often lacked the views of field-level functionaries. This study aims to involve a large number of expert practitioners in India to identify the significant contemporary competition risks in public procurement from the procurer and supplier sides and develop a model depicting the hierarchy of competition-restrictive actions (CRAs) in procurement based on their mutual interactions.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe significant CRAs along the procurement cycle are identified through literature survey, interactive workshops and expert interviews. A questionnaire survey covering 143 respondents from 12 public organizations is used to evaluate their impact. Considering the complex causal interactions involved, interpretive structural modeling followed by MICMAC (Iimpact matrix cross-reference multiplication applied to a classification analysis is used to develop a hierarchical model of competition risks in procurement.\n\n\nFindings\nTailor-made contracts, splitting of a project below competition thresholds, restrictive selection criteria and awarding the contract on nomination emerge as CRAs with the highest driving power. Horizontal collusion among vendors strongly depends on practices followed in the procuring organization.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe survey data and the experts’ opinions emanate from practitioners in India, which is a limitation. However, with necessary contextual calibrations, the study is of high functional utility to policymakers and practitioners.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe research facilitates a comprehensive understanding to procurement managers/policymakers of the CRAs along the procurement cycle and their interdependencies. It offers valuable insights for improving competition, which is foundational for optimal procurement outcomes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study enriches the public procurement domain knowledge by identifying and assessing the significant contemporary CRAs, examining their mutual interactions and developing an interpretive structural model. Although contributing to the body of knowledge, the study is unique in being grounded in field realities.\n","PeriodicalId":45136,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Procurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Procurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jopp-12-2022-0060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose With the surge in public procurement, especially in developing countries, ensuring fair competition in procurement has assumed paramount importance. Academic endeavors in the domain of competition issues have often lacked the views of field-level functionaries. This study aims to involve a large number of expert practitioners in India to identify the significant contemporary competition risks in public procurement from the procurer and supplier sides and develop a model depicting the hierarchy of competition-restrictive actions (CRAs) in procurement based on their mutual interactions. Design/methodology/approach The significant CRAs along the procurement cycle are identified through literature survey, interactive workshops and expert interviews. A questionnaire survey covering 143 respondents from 12 public organizations is used to evaluate their impact. Considering the complex causal interactions involved, interpretive structural modeling followed by MICMAC (Iimpact matrix cross-reference multiplication applied to a classification analysis is used to develop a hierarchical model of competition risks in procurement. Findings Tailor-made contracts, splitting of a project below competition thresholds, restrictive selection criteria and awarding the contract on nomination emerge as CRAs with the highest driving power. Horizontal collusion among vendors strongly depends on practices followed in the procuring organization. Research limitations/implications The survey data and the experts’ opinions emanate from practitioners in India, which is a limitation. However, with necessary contextual calibrations, the study is of high functional utility to policymakers and practitioners. Social implications The research facilitates a comprehensive understanding to procurement managers/policymakers of the CRAs along the procurement cycle and their interdependencies. It offers valuable insights for improving competition, which is foundational for optimal procurement outcomes. Originality/value The study enriches the public procurement domain knowledge by identifying and assessing the significant contemporary CRAs, examining their mutual interactions and developing an interpretive structural model. Although contributing to the body of knowledge, the study is unique in being grounded in field realities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共工程采购中竞争限制行为的建模
目的随着公共采购的激增,特别是在发展中国家,确保采购的公平竞争变得至关重要。竞争问题领域的学术努力往往缺乏实地工作人员的意见。本研究旨在让印度的大量专业从业者参与进来,从采购方和供应商方确定公共采购中的重大当代竞争风险,并根据其相互作用开发一个描述采购中竞争限制行动等级的模型。设计/方法/方法通过文献调查、互动研讨会和专家访谈确定采购周期中的重要CRA。对来自12个公共组织的143名受访者进行了问卷调查,以评估其影响。考虑到所涉及的复杂因果相互作用,MICMAC之后的解释性结构建模(应用于分类分析的影响矩阵交叉参考乘法用于开发采购中竞争风险的层次模型。制定量身定制的合同、将项目拆分到竞争阈值以下、限制性选择标准和在提名时授予合同是具有最高驱动力的CRA很大程度上取决于采购组织所遵循的做法。研究局限性/含义调查数据和专家的意见来自印度的从业者,这是一个局限性。然而,通过必要的背景校准,该研究对政策制定者和从业者具有很高的实用性。社会含义该研究有助于全面了解CRA的采购经理/决策者在采购周期及其相互依存关系。它为改善竞争提供了宝贵的见解,而竞争是优化采购结果的基础。独创性/价值该研究通过识别和评估当代重要的CRA,检查它们的相互作用,并开发一个解释性结构模型,丰富了公共采购领域的知识。尽管这项研究有助于形成知识体系,但其独特之处在于它立足于实地现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Procurement
Journal of Public Procurement PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Procurement (JOPP) seeks to further the understanding of public procurement. JOPP publishes original, high-quality research that explores the theories and practices of public procurement. The journal ensures that high-quality research is collected and disseminated widely to both academics and practitioners, and provides a forum for debate. It covers all subjects relating to the purchase of goods, services and works by public organizations at a local, regional, national and international level. JOPP is multi-disciplinary, with a broad approach towards methods and styles of research as well as the level of issues addressed. The Journal welcomes the submission of papers from researchers internationally. The journal welcomes research papers, narrative essays, exemplar cases, forums, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Approaching transcendence: a conceptual discussion on procurement fraud, education, professionalism maturity, ethics and implications Procurement practices and operational performance: a study of linear and curvilinear relationships in a developing economy The predicting role of sustainable supplier selection on lead-time performance in public procurement: relational capability as a moderator Challenges of black construction professionals with Black Economic Empowerment as a procurement policy in South Africa Streamlining professionalisation in public procurement: Romanian competency frameworks as a case study (Part B)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1