A Prostitutes’ Jamboree: The World Whores’ Congresses of the 1980s and the Rise of a New Feminism

IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of the History of Sexuality Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.7560/jhs31301
M. Weeks
{"title":"A Prostitutes’ Jamboree: The World Whores’ Congresses of the 1980s and the Rise of a New Feminism","authors":"M. Weeks","doi":"10.7560/jhs31301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"W e a r i n g a b l a c k c l o t h W r a p p e d around her head that obscured her eyes and nose, a spokeswoman for the Marxist-feminist English Collective of Prostitutes (ECP) gave a heated interview to a reporter from the British weekly The Observer in the wake of the second World Whores’ Congress in 1986. “Forget the reasons the academics and do-gooders come up with: women don’t go on the game for kicks, or because they were raped as children, or because they like the lifestyle—they do it for money,” she said, rejecting competing discourses that reduced women’s motives in selling sex to pleasure seeking, psychological pathology, or personal preference.1 Another masked woman, arms crossed defiantly, told the reporter that “women should have the right to choose whether to go on the game and not be forced into it because they need the money,” cautioning against what she understood to be a sanguine appraisal of the role of free will in sex work.2 Insisting on anonymity to protect the legal and social vulnerability of its members, the ECP rejected what it perceived as the prowork, institutional orientation of the congress, hosted by the European Parliament in Brussels and organized by two prostitutes’ advocacy organizations, US-based Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics (COYOTE) and the Red Thread of the Netherlands. Building on a history of radical confrontation with the state, ECP members boycotted the congress because of its alleged appeal to federal","PeriodicalId":45704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","volume":"31 1","pages":"273 - 301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/jhs31301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

W e a r i n g a b l a c k c l o t h W r a p p e d around her head that obscured her eyes and nose, a spokeswoman for the Marxist-feminist English Collective of Prostitutes (ECP) gave a heated interview to a reporter from the British weekly The Observer in the wake of the second World Whores’ Congress in 1986. “Forget the reasons the academics and do-gooders come up with: women don’t go on the game for kicks, or because they were raped as children, or because they like the lifestyle—they do it for money,” she said, rejecting competing discourses that reduced women’s motives in selling sex to pleasure seeking, psychological pathology, or personal preference.1 Another masked woman, arms crossed defiantly, told the reporter that “women should have the right to choose whether to go on the game and not be forced into it because they need the money,” cautioning against what she understood to be a sanguine appraisal of the role of free will in sex work.2 Insisting on anonymity to protect the legal and social vulnerability of its members, the ECP rejected what it perceived as the prowork, institutional orientation of the congress, hosted by the European Parliament in Brussels and organized by two prostitutes’ advocacy organizations, US-based Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics (COYOTE) and the Red Thread of the Netherlands. Building on a history of radical confrontation with the state, ECP members boycotted the congress because of its alleged appeal to federal
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妓女大露营:80年代世界妓女大会与新女权主义的兴起
1986年第二次世界妓女大会结束后,马克思主义女权主义英国妓女协会(ECP)的女发言人在接受英国《观察家报》记者的采访时,激烈地进行了激烈的采访。她说:“忘掉那些学者和行善者们提出的理由吧:女人不是为了好玩,或者因为她们小时候被强奸过,或者因为她们喜欢这种生活方式——她们是为了钱——她们这样做的。”她拒绝了那些将女性卖淫的动机归结为寻求快乐、心理病理或个人偏好的争论另一名蒙面女子,双臂交叉,反抗地告诉记者,“女性应该有权选择是否参加这个游戏,而不是因为需要钱而被迫参加。”她警告说,她认为这是对性工作中自由意志作用的乐观评价ECP坚持匿名以保护其成员的法律和社会脆弱性,它拒绝了它所认为的大会的项目和制度取向。这次大会由布鲁塞尔的欧洲议会主办,由两个妓女倡导组织——美国的Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics (COYOTE)和荷兰的红线组织。在与国家激进对抗的历史基础上,ECP成员抵制了这次大会,因为它据称对联邦政府有吸引力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Productive Sexological Self-Censorship in Late Communist Poland between State and Church “Are We to Treat Human Nature as the Early Victorian Lady Treated Telegrams?”: British and German Sexual Science, Investigations of Nature, and the Fight against Censorship, ca. 1890–1940 “A Mechanical View of Sex outside the Context of Love and the Family”: Contraception, Censorship, and the Brook Advisory Centre in Britain, 1964–1985 Introduction: Sex, Science, and Censorship Censorship in Flux: Sex and Sexological Knowledge at the Great Police Exhibition of 1926 in Weimar Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1